Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Feds, Most States Fail to Protect Public from Tobacco-Related Illnesses, Group Says
January 13, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The federal government and most U.S. states have failed to adopt policies that would protect the public from tobacco-related illnesses, according to a new 'report card' from the  American Lung Association.

The State of Tobacco Control report gave the federal government "F" grades on three critical measures: regulation of tobacco products, coverage of cessation products, and taxation -- and a "D" grade for ratification of an international tobacco-control treaty.

The group said that Congress failed to pass a measure that would give the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the power to regulate tobacco products, does not require state Medicaid programs to cover smoking-cessation treatment (although the Medicaid prescription-drug benefit does cover cessation products), and has set the federal tobacco tax at a very low 39 cents per pack. The report also chided the Bush administration for failing to submit the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control to the Senate for ratification.

States were judged based on their adoption of smokefree legislation, higher cigarette taxes, support of tobacco prevention and control programs, and coverage of cessation treatments. No states received "A" grades, while seven states -- Alabama, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia -- received "F"s.

Only Alaska and Delaware received "A"s for funding tobacco prevention and control in line with recommendations from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Massachusetts, New York, and the District of Columbia were the only states to raise cigarette taxes in 2008, and only Iowa and Nebraska passed smokefree legislation.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by maxwood on 14 Jan 09 07:25 PM EST
Higher cigarette taxes are a double-edged sword, because they give the states and Fed an incentive to protect the tax revenue bonanza by protecting the tobacco trade "bizness as usual". In particular while states were judged "based on... smokefree legislation, higher cigarette taxes, ...prevention and control programs, and coverage of cessation treatments" there is no mention of REDUCTION in the form of vaporizer, e-cigarette or miniature (25-mg.) smoking utensil. Further, the banning of cannabis serves as a pretext to defend the tobacco industry against these means of dosage reduction which would decimate its profits, on the specious ground that they are (illegally) cannabis-related.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines