Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Federal Cigarette Tax Hike Could Affect State Plans
February 10, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

A new federal cigarette tax increase is complicating efforts by states to use tobacco taxes to plug holes in budgets and fund programs, the Wall Street Journal reported Feb. 8.

At least 16 states are considering cigarette tax increases to help cover budget gaps that the National Conference of State Legislatures estimates will total $47.4 billion in 2009. However, the new 61-cent federal tax increase, included in a children's health insurance bill, takes effect in April 2009 and could lead to reduced cigarette sales, more counterfeiting, and less-than-projected state tax revenues. States could significantly raise their own taxes to offset the expected drop.

The current average state cigarette tax is $1.19 a pack.

Although higher prices reduce cigarette consumption -- a 10-percent price increase per pack equals an approximate 4 percent drop in consumption -- tobacco-tax revenue has continued to rise in nearly every state that has imposed significant tax increases, said Frank Chaloupka, an economist and tobacco-tax expert at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

In Mississippi, where competing versions of tax legislation are under debate in the House and Senate, the federal tax increase "throws the state's proposals up in the air" since tax-revenue projections need to be recalculated, said Dan Turner, a spokesman for Gov. Haley Barbour.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Kel on 11 Feb 09 01:29 AM EST
This tax increase will only lead to loss of revenue for states, the federal government, tobacco companies, and most of all for the growers. The providers of the product will not be able to provide, due to the ever increase in operation costs, the consumers will not be able to buy, because they are losing jobs left and right, the states will lose the tax money they so heavily relied upon and the federal government will get a slap in the face when they realize that they have completely depleted the income of the working class, low income people, thereby reducing that tax revenue they expected from increasing the federal tax to unbelievable amts, to help the low income children, whatever it is that they have as a target, and well there won't be anything left to do but wonder why taxing something over and over again doesn't work?????

Posted by JLUW on 11 Feb 09 09:52 AM EST
Why not tax other tobacco products, such as smokeless tobacco, cigars, cigarellos, pipe tobacco, etc? There's revenue in these legal products. Hmm, maybe if there weren't any tobacco products, the states wouldn't have to spend so much in healthcare costs for the tobacco consumers who are creating a drain on all of us? Get real!

Posted by Bill Godshall on 11 Feb 09 12:11 PM EST
The federal cigarette tax increase is the single most impactful action ever taken by US Congress to reduce the nation's deadliest drug addiction. The new tax will reduce nationwide sales/consumption by about 7% (1.2 billion packs/year), which will reduce state cigarette tax revenue by about 7%. State tobacco settlement revenues are likely to decline by about 4%. States also would be wise to increase their cigarette tax rates. Perhaps Kel and JLUW want more addicted smokers to get sick and die, while state and federal governments are forced to subsidize those healthcare costs. BTW, the SCHIP law also raised the federal tax on smokeless tobacco and cigars, with the cigar tax hike far greater than that for cigarettes (which makes no public health sense since cigarettes are far more addictive and deadlier than cigars.

Posted by Jason on 11 Feb 09 06:31 PM EST
WooHoo! The higher those prices are, the fewer kids end up using tobacco. Keep raising em fellas.

Posted by DAS on 13 Feb 09 05:17 PM EST
Alcohol problems cost American society more than $184 billion in 1998 (12) in health care, criminal justice, social services, property damage, and loss of productivity expenses. Alcohol is a factor in as many as 105,000 deaths annually (13) in the United States and a primary contributor to a wide array of health problems and human suffering. These include various cancers, liver disease, alcoholism, brain disorders, motor vehicle crashes, violence, crime, spousal and child abuse, drownings, and suicides (8,14). * Underage drinking, much of it beer, costs Americans nearly $53 billion in 1996, amounting to the equivalent of $200 for every man, women and child in the United States.......Now this does NOT COMPARE to A SMOKER ....PERIOD

Posted by DSM on 14 Feb 09 08:30 PM EST
It just amazes me how people believe what the government tells them. The tobacco tax is a band aid. The government has spent so much of our tax dollars now they do this. Once the tobacco is taxed out, and that will only be in a few years, where do you think they will go next to get the money to make up what they spent all these years? They really need to learn to cut back in Washington and the States. The low and middle class have only so much money. We cant afford to be taxed and taxed and taxed. With the way the government is spending, in a very short time we will have to just all be on Welfare and hand our paychecks to the government. There are less smokers out there than ever and with this tax increase there will be less. Yes, that's a good thing but how long until this is not enough? I give it less than 5 years, mark my words, and we will be discussing the next band aide.

Posted by MAW on 17 Feb 09 01:00 PM EST
Smokeless tobacco products have been added to this new tax hike.My husband and I started rolling our own cigarettes to help keep cost down, and now a 1 pound bag of tobacco which costs 18.oo, is being raised by 25.oo making it more than double. Alcohol is by far more deadly, and is ignored in all of this, which is a joke. As far as the smoking goes, we have been thinking about alternate ways to avoid these ridiculous taxes, and we'll find one.

Posted by RDB on 22 Feb 09 10:08 AM EST
I live in the state of Maine and I roll my own as of now i am paying $9.01 for a 6 oz Bag and a box of tubes, starting April 1st I will be paying $20.99 just for the 6 oz bag of tobacco not including the tubes. Instead of complaining about it I'll just quit.

Posted by Heather on 01 Mar 09 07:35 AM EST
Okay, this debate is agravating me because although I do NOT smoke, members of my family do. This "help the children" BS is just that- BS. Hurting mommy and daddy through their habits does not help children- it just means that a lot of already poor children will go without a little more because another household item has gone up in price. I know it sounds awful but reality isn't pretty and anyone who thinks tax hikes on their parents can help children is suffering double think. Many of these people CAN'T quit. Also, the governments pitched these taxes as a way to reduce use- when its real goal is revenue (isn't that apparent yet?) As use goes down, that lessened demand will be a call for a higher tax, just like the current gasoline consumption's vicious cycle. Its a majority picking on a minority. Also, this whoo-haa about smokers "draining" the public for health care? Okay, lets tax people who engage in contact sports, plastic surgery, high risk jobs, driving, or any other activity that can cause a health risk! Tax kids who climb trees!

Posted by awakereality on 02 Mar 09 04:34 PM EST
Wait until alcohol is taxed to the max.Families not being abused. Workers doing a better job. No drunken brawls. No drunk drivers killing and maiming. Less break ins and robbers. Less doctor and hospital visits due to all the health problems caused by alcohol. Fewer divorces. This list could go on and on, but nobody seems to get it. Too many people at the top and in government drink.

Posted by thang on 07 Mar 09 10:00 PM EST
I can understand those that want an addictive product off the market but are you people considering the addition to unemployment that it will lead...growers and manufacturers out of business! Then we have these previously employed people in the unemployment line signing up for government subsidies....You win on one side, but these subsidies are KILLING our social security part of retirement. I know it is a lose-lose situation but taxing it this hard is really going to make the situation worse.....

Posted by rob2six on 08 Mar 09 07:59 AM EDT
Well, it seems all of you have good points and we all seem to be somewhere on the same page but that page needs to viewed in the context of the whole book from the top of the world. The big picture reveals a much different story in which 9-11 was just the beginning of the end and that America has actually been under siege ever since; an on going reign of domestic terror destined to remake America in the image of One World Government. Regardless of how absurd you may think it sounds, you mark my words, Orwell's 1984 has never been closer to reality. Do the math. You connect ALL the dots.

Posted by lajack on 08 Mar 09 08:11 PM EDT
I believe it's about time government starts ruling this country under god's principals. We see the results of mans thinking, and it stinks

Posted by Donna on 09 Mar 09 02:03 AM EDT
I do not have a problem paying a "fair" share of taxes on my "addiction". HOWEVER, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONSUMERS SHOULD ALSO SHARE IN THIS HIDEOUS TAXATION. Also, It is my understanding that this newest federal taxation on smokers is to ensure all children have insurance. Under TennCare there are uninsured children.

Posted by theniteguy on 09 Mar 09 09:34 AM EDT
In addition to what Heather posted, I think we need to tax the Congress for buffoonery, hot air, stupidity, and the utter disdain they show for average Americans. I am beginning to sense a need for a coup d'etat.

Posted by emcatsnonni on 10 Mar 09 12:29 AM EDT
Never has a driver taken out a family in an auto accident while DUI of nicotine! Good God Almighty, cigarette smoking is being singled out as a "sin tax" ~~ nothing more; nothing less! Smokers are now outdoors to catch a puff, persona non grata in restaurants, and NOW you want us to to pay for your childen's HEATHCARE??? How about rousting some healthcare tax money out of JOE SIX-PAK who beats his wife, or Congress sucking up all that call-brand liquor? Alcohol ruins families and lives! A little financial sacrifice may be in order from alcohol!!! Targeting the cigarette-smoking addicts (who will, incidentally, get them ANY way they can!), screams for reviving that good old 10% "Federal luxury tax" on lipstick, jewelry and hedonistic self indulgences! The fallout of the staggering costs of cigarettes has hit three weeks early! Thank you Philip Morris for the "jump start" on the screwing you'll get for the screwing you've given! Boycott your PM products!

Posted by Ctuna on 10 Mar 09 08:21 AM EDT
This is just one more way of Big Brother telling us what is good for us. If the point is to make money, then raising the price higher causes people to stop. Which means..... less income. If the point is to get people to stop smoking, than quadruple the price and everyone will quit. Oh wait, that would put people and companies out of business. It is just one more way that a minority group gets the shaft. After all smoking is legal folks. You may not like it, but I have the right to smoke. If the point is to lower health costs, then go after the drug companies and the prices they charge for drugs. Clamp down on the excessive abuse of Medicare. Oh wait, that would effect lobbyists and that whole world. Why not add .05 per beer bottle? That could add millions to the economy. Why not add .05 to each bottle of water sold... could be billions. Those that voted for Obama and "change". Well you are getting it by the barrel full. Oh and don't forget the "change" coming in your paychecks. $13.00 on average, now that's change. Happy?

Posted by Pheobe on 10 Mar 09 09:51 AM EDT
Ctuna - yes I am happy.

Posted by RLH on 12 Mar 09 11:51 AM EDT
Oh please, is everyone so naive to think that the Federal Government (and State and Local as well) did this to reduce smoking? They did it for the same reason that the State and Local Law enforcement now concentrate their efforts on "Ticket-able Offenses", to generate revenue. All under the guise of making our lives Healthier and Safer. We have truely become 'Sheeple'.The state holds out its loving cup, Singing power to the people, But their power's corrupt. Yankee Doodle leadin'lambs to slaughter. We pay to wear the blindfold.

Posted by BB on 12 Mar 09 07:33 PM EDT
why not tax all liquor & beer the same as cigarettes?? i`ve nerver known someone to kill because they smoked cigarettes!! how many people are killed every day because of a drunk driver?? why not tax everyone that does not drive an american made vehicle!! i guess i`ll start smoking pot! as you can tell i`m pissed!!

Posted by michele on 14 Mar 09 09:44 PM EDT
ok we pay 1.19 in stae tax per pack + federal plus sales tax! we pay tax on taxes!I'm in NV. I pay $5 a pack.ok take that -1.19 & -.61 federal tax apack of ciggs is $3.20 without tax but they charge sales tax 7.5% on final sale. so we are paying sales tax on tax!!!What is the actual price of ciggs without taxes????

Posted by Kat on 15 Mar 09 02:02 PM EDT
I am THRILLED with this tactic! I love hearing that current smokers will be "quitting" on april 1st because they refuse to pay the higher taxes. Smokers's talk of their right to smoke -- but what about people's right to breath air not tainted with smoke? I am as asthmatic who dreads every time I walk through the gauntlet of second hand smoke to enter a public building!

Posted by Ashley on 17 Mar 09 07:20 PM EDT
Wow, it's only smoker's who get sick and die ? People complain about second hand smoke, yet never complain about the polluted air full of toxins and poisons that's killing them. Sorry, smokers aren't responsible for all the sickness, diseases, and death in the world, it's big corp who poison the air, pay kickbacks to government allowing it, and smoking is the scapegoat.

Posted by sully on 18 Mar 09 02:08 PM EDT
Here in Ma the lowest price at the local Mom and Pop store is $5.47. I go to NH and buy my cigs for $2.99 a pack. I'm going up to NH today and buying 10 Cartons. Stock up before hand. Ma just raised their cigs $1.00 per pack a month or so ago now the feds are raising the taxes. Where will it end on the little people.

Posted by Darren on 20 Mar 09 11:05 PM EDT
Where can someone get copies of the actual tobacco laws (word for word)? Could tobacco laws have loop holes? Could tobacco be sold for non-smoking or non-chewing uses? Such as "Night Crawler Feed" and packaged for that use? Would that be a way to avoid taxes?

Posted by Steve on 23 Mar 09 09:40 PM EDT
Why is the focus always on cigarettes and tobacco products? Why not put a HUGE tax on alcohol?...Oh, the liberals and powers that be drink alcohol way more frequently than smoke. Besides, it's politically correct to drink, but not smoke. While there is no doubt tobacco products are harmful to one's health; however, ask that family member whether they'd rather have a smoker or a drunk. Let's finally do something to stop alcohol abuse. Think we'll see a 156% increase on liquor or beer...I think not!

Posted by Steve on 23 Mar 09 10:51 PM EDT
My bad...I've heard from associates that alcohol has been targeted as well. Sorry for the uninformed rant. I do still believe this is primarily a tax on lower income citizens and somehow, these tax increases are another example of big government. There must be a better way to curb tobacco and alcohol use.

Posted by Phoebe on 24 Mar 09 10:01 AM EDT
Actually, Steve, your "bad" is saying "the liberals and powers that be drink alcohol way more frequently than smoke." Alcohol is equal opportunity and bipartisan.

Posted by ??????? on 31 Mar 09 11:46 PM EDT
I don't see how this tax increase stops more kids from smoking! All I see is more kids stealing more cigarettes from those who smoke!

Posted by Valerie Emerson on 14 Apr 09 01:47 AM EDT
Well im about feed up! bamma ramma can spout off all he wants about down with the rich up with the poor..he just stabed the poor in the back, and the pocket book. the only peeps left who can now enjoy cigs are the rich..another perk for the rich.and lets make the poor kids a lille poorer, and hum seems ive herd the false promise of where the money will go before, our state lotto was ear marked for our schools...remember?..we have over 50 schools closing! in our area we are loosing 2 schools and an alternative ed. Im a smoker. and yes im mad...but i also know this isnt going to effect just the smokers..think of the kids on state aid single family homes, what will they now go with out so mom or daddy can smoke.this is insane, my tobacco went from 19.98 to a whopping 62.50 a bag...im seeking another ave. for my nasty lille habit! any one know a pusher?

Posted by jim c on 05 May 09 08:49 PM EDT
after the new tax went into effect, I purchased 4 bags of roll your own and was charged an additional 6+ dollars sales tax. I always thought it was illegal to charge tax on a tax. not only did we get hit the federal tax but we have a 6 dollar sales tax increase.

Posted by Albert Lifrieri on 16 May 09 09:55 AM EDT
All I have to say is that this looks like 1930's Germany.

Posted by Cyndy B. on 18 May 09 09:04 PM EDT
Bama is a hypocrite. GWB had common sense he vetoed this unfair tax. Why not tax the porn industry? $1 per mag, $2 per dvd. Why not tax alcohol? The list is endless. Tax the fast food joints for the fatties having heart bypass surgeries at 2 million a pop. Freedom in the USA can kiss its azz goodbye.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines