Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Faith-Based Funding Review Planned
February 6, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

President Barack Obama has ordered a review of the government's faith-based funding initiative, and changes could include a ban on federal funding of groups that discriminate on the basis of religion or other factors when hiring employees.

The Associated Press reported Feb. 4 that Obama has requested that the U.S. Justice Department conduct a legal review of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, the successor to an agency formed in the Bush administration to facilitate grantmaking and support for religious-based charities.

During his presidential campaign, Obama said he wanted to expand the work of the faith-based initiative but objected to a policy allowing grantees to base hiring on an applicant's religion. Programs run by faith-based groups must also focus on secular needs and public funds should not be used to proselytize, Obama advisors said.

"As someone who used to teach constitutional law, I believe deeply in the separation of church and state, but I don't believe this partnership will endanger that idea -- so long as we follow a few basic principles," Obama said in a campaign speech last year.

Joshua DuBois, a Pentecostal minister who worked on the Obama campaign, was appointed to head the office, and 25 religious and secular leaders will be named to an advisory panel. 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Gary George on 09 Feb 09 11:25 AM EST
This seems a pair of oxymorons. First, we are going to fund faith based programs but these programs have to hire people of different faiths (thus, we will support these programs but tear them down with dilution and people who have fundamental differences in religious beliefs). Next, we will support faith based programs but they must have non-faith based people working in them. Why don't we cut the BS and just fund treatment programs that have research to back their usefulness; any program, faith based of not. Allow each program to function as it sees fit as long as there is research to demonstrate the program's effectiveness. Make them hire anyone with any background they desire if it enhances the effectiveness of their program. All employees would be required to be certified in the capacity they serve as treatment providers.

Posted by Kathi Davis on 09 Feb 09 01:54 PM EST
I agree with Mr. George's point of view. All this being politically correct is just allowing more and more addicts to die. There is no one right way to get sober; some seek treatment that provides a spiritual emphasis, some do not. As long as proper protocol is followed and care providers are trained properly, allow the different centers to run their day-to-day care as they see fit.

Posted by Hey...Hey... on 09 Feb 09 02:00 PM EST
Gary, your comments reek of way too much common sense. Undermining or removing the "faith" aspect of these "Faith Based" initiatives by forcing them to employ faithless staff or even diametrically opposed believing team members to guide their program participants in their recovery via a "Faith Based" strategy is absolutely brainless. Your comments are dead on.

Posted by Dr. John Gardin on 09 Feb 09 02:51 PM EST
Gary, you are my kind of guy. Unfortunately, funding is tied to so many political agendas, such a rational approach would be way too, well, rational.

Posted by budy920 on 09 Feb 09 02:52 PM EST
I really don't think that the President's review of these programs and their hiring practices is focusing on drug treatment programs. i'm thinking that he's trying to insure that if the programs get federal funds, they must follow the non discrimination aspects of receiving public dollars. my guess is that those agencies who want to continue to get funded will comply and those that are against a diverse workforce will either drop out or face some litigation.

Posted by Don F. on 10 Feb 09 02:04 PM EST
I work in the recovery field and contacted a faith based recovery program to explore a potential source of referral. I was told it wasn't really about recovery except to the extent that recovery was about a relationship with Jesus. There is nothing wrong with promoting Christianity within a recovery program but, where public funds are concerned there needs to be enough creativity to promote the spiritual principles that are helpful to all and not exclusive to a particular religion. We have a diversified public, if you want public funding your program should cater to that diversity.

Posted by Sharla on 02 Mar 09 01:56 PM EST
Gary, You hit the nail on the head! Don, organizations that receive federal funds cannot currently be used to prostelytize. While I don't personally believe that to be right a right constitutional interpretation, I respect that view of separation of church & state. The problem comes when faith-based organizations are forced to go against the beliefs of their organization in hiring practices. The discrimination clause on the basis of faith should not apply to faith-based organizations, period. That, in my mind, would also violate the separation of church & state by the "state" forcing its beliefs, or lack thereof, on the "church". Sadly, no one wants to admit that overtly faith-based programs are usually more successful in making long-term positive changes in its participants' lives.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines