Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Drug Czar Nominee Praised for Pragmatism
March 27, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Obama administration drug-czar nominee Gil Kerlikowske has both a family and professional history with drugs and addiction and has often steered a middle path in tackling the issues on a community level, the Washington Post reported March 24.

Kerlikowske, most recently chief of police in Seattle, worked as an undercover narcotics officer in his first law-enforcement job in Florida and has an adopted son who has struggled with addiction. In Seattle, he won praise for seeking compromise rather than confrontation in striking a balance between enforcing drug laws and accommodating medical-marijuana patients.

Kerlikowske wasn't a groundbreaker in calling for alternatives to arresting drug users, but has embraced the concept, including drug courts. Those who know him expect Kerlikowske to support a shift in national drug-control policy away from enforcement and towards treatment and prevention.

Called a thoughtful pragmatist, Kerlikowske is not a drug-policy expert; his expertise lies in community policing. Friends describe him as ambitious, and his career has progressed steadily despite occasional controversy. In Seattle, he was known for attending community meetings personally rather than sending delegates.

"Without a lot of fanfare or hoopla, Gil has made clear that, as far as the police are concerned, they are really to give attention to the prevention-rehabilitation side of things, as well as the enforcement side of things," said retired University of Washington professor of public affairs Hubert Locke.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Gerald A. Bunn, MA on 30 Mar 09 09:47 AM EDT
It is gratifying to hear someone filling the position as Drug Czar who is both a pragmatist and, apparently, a humanist. After 35 years in the addiction field, starting in the U.S. Navy and, following retirement, the civilian worlds in both the U.S. and 13 years in New Zealand, I have heard too many postulate that there is only "one" answer to issues surrounding alcohol and other drugs. Congratulations Gil from another Seattle-lite. Gerald A. Bunn,MA Commander, USN(Ret)

Posted by matthew gissen on 30 Mar 09 10:57 AM EDT
A shift in emphasis by the ONDCP to treatment and prevention will serve our country well. It has been a long time coming and will show results in saving lives and costs to our communities. The director will have the full support of the entire prevention and treatment field across this nation.

Posted by Scott Graham, MBA, CBHE on 30 Mar 09 11:19 AM EDT
It's nice to hear about the candidate's views on treatment. The drug trade is a supply/demand business. Treatment, well-funded treatment, has the potential to reduce demand, reduce price and subsequently impact crime and violence. Best of luck, Mr. Kerlikowske.

Posted by jed on 30 Mar 09 11:51 AM EDT
As a masters-level substance abuse clinician, I am encouraged by Mr. Kerlikowske's past record and sound thinking. Reducing demand should always be the top priority because it has a two-fold effect. It helps addicts directly by getting them back in control of their own lives and it hurts the drug cartels by taking away their customers. I can only hope that President Obama and Congress heed the suggestions of this well-intentioned and well-qualified gentleman.

Posted by Boogie on 30 Mar 09 01:33 PM EDT
Until we get someone in that office who believes drug addiction and alcoholism is a choice. The wheel jnust continue to turn in favor of so called "addicts" and "alcoholics" who are in charge of this self made industry of "Madolfs". Prention is the Best Treatment.

Posted by Brinna on 30 Mar 09 03:24 PM EDT
Boogie (Nights), we have had of decades drug czars and their ilk that believe addiction is a choice, and that incarceration will actually make a difference. Hasn't worked very well, has it?

Posted by Boogie on 30 Mar 09 08:05 PM EDT
Incarceration, actually works well in my book. The more of these so called "addicts and alcoholics" who relish in being called that, you know the phrase, Hi, my name is" are off the street the less likely they are to commit crimes against law abiding citizens. If you make a bad choice, you pay for your mistake not taxpayers who are footing the bills for these bad choices. Build more jails or send them all to the Arizona prison in the desert. Lock them up and keep them locked up until they get the message, society is fed up with these bad behaviors. Play the game by the rules or else don't play!

Posted by maxwood on 30 Mar 09 09:05 PM EDT
Reading through Boogie's two tirades, I focus on his inspiring closer: "Play the game by the rules or else don't play!" I don't think life, or society is a "game" and excuse me, I don't think what I do, for better or worse, is "play". "Work" is defined as a "win+win" enterprise seeking to benefit everybody, whereas "play" is a zero-sum, win-lose semitragedy. Only, at $20,000 a year keeping non-violent rule-breakers locked up, every taxpayer loses.

Posted by Boogie on 30 Mar 09 10:16 PM EDT
Now,I welcome this engagement. Because if what I'm writing and it's my opinion is a tirade, it only proves my point. Some people just don't get it. Is this the "enterprise" whatever that means. Work is defined by Funk & Wagnalls differently than the above. Life is a game of good people v bad people and the bad people who do bad things are always looking for an easy way out. Usually by calling their problem some unproven desease to get the sympathy of the good who are brainwashed in to believing this could be them someday and that severe punishment should not be an option if they are caught. $20,000.00 is a small price to pay when on the other hand a drunk kills somebody when he should have been locked up or dope user molest a child because he got of jail to early. How much is this carnege costing good people everyday. We waste billions of dollars on senseless recovery programs that don't work, simply out of fear. Fear projected by the same bad people who did the carnege in the first place. One day at a time works about as good as just say no. It's time to keep it real and get back to what realy works, don't do the crime, if you can't do the time.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 31 Mar 09 04:34 PM EDT
Incarceration is just one tool of a comprehensive approach to the substance use problem. First a well funded prevention system that is outcome driven. Second, treatment on demand. Incarceration motivates many addicts to seek treatment. There are to types of people who use drugs, addicts who do crime to support their habbit, get them treatment they stop doing crime, and criminals who do drugs. This group can stop using drugs but will still commit crimes, treatment will not stop them. We need all the tools. They all work together.

Posted by Boogie on 02 Apr 09 12:29 PM EDT
A well rounded prevention system would be ideal if there was money to actually fund it, instead of wasteing billions of dollars on recovery programs. Taxpayer funded recovery programs, such as prop 36 and the like, should be done away with, they are just get out of jail free card for the most part for users. People who make their own choices to use alcohol or drugs and pay for the same should pay for any help they may need. It's time for all substance users to be accountable for their own mistakes. People who break the law know they are breaking the law and the one tool they need to be aaware of is if they break the law, they go to jail and it's going to cost them, not the tax payer, right up to reimbursement for incarceration. So let's take away all that money from theses do nothing programs and put it in to prevention to help the next generation of kids be better adults, but first be better kids.

Posted by Elizabeth J. Bunn on 04 May 09 03:46 PM EDT
There will always be people like this. That believe the world isn't round, that addiction isn't a disease, and recovery programs don't work or incarceration is the answer to all of peoples mistakes. If that were true, one would think criminals would stop commiting crimes after serving one sentance, or maybe two... in case they didn't get all they needed the first time around. But the overcrowding in our prisons is proof locking them up is not the answer. A treatment program must be put in place to help these people productive citizens once again. Doing the time and getting released is a "time out" from their addiction, once on the street they will return to it and either return once more to prison (a taxpayer drain) or be in and out of hospitals (another taxpayer drain) and not for treatment. Many addicts are found on the streets, drunk or high and taken to emergency rooms where they are treated and released to abuse again and again. "Frequent flyers" is the not so PC term for them. Untold millions are spent in unreimbursed medical care. I would much rather see it spent in treatment programs to get them off the street, sober, straight, and in worker training, than flying through the ER's and in and out of jails/prisons like the revolving doors at the Hilton. Chief K. did a good job here in Seattle, and I think he can do it again in this position.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines