Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Domestic Dissatisfaction with Mexican Drug War Grows
August 4, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Mexico's bloody war on the nation's drug cartels may be losing public and political support, the Washington Post reported July 28.

Some members of President Felipe Calderon's own political party are calling for a shift in tactics in the face of a violent, military-oriented confrontation that has led to more than 10,000 deaths. "The people of Mexico are losing hope, and it is urgent that Congress, the political parties and the president reconsider this strategy," said Sen. Ramon Galindo, a Calderon supporter and former mayor of Ciudad Juarez.

Critics say that Mexico's drug cartels have expanded their operations and have carried out acts of violence against police, the military, government officials and others with relative impunity. "The question is whether the country can withstand another three years of this, with violence that undermines the credibility of the government," said Carlos Flores of Mexico's Center for Investigations and Advanced Studies in Social Anthropology.  "I'd like to be more optimistic, but what I see is more of the same polarizing and failed strategy."

The campaign has resulted in the arrest of 76,765 drug suspects, and backers say Mexico has little choice but to use the military to fight the cartels. "No one has told us what alternative we have," said Interior Minister Fernando Gomez Mont, who said the government has no intention of changing its tactics. "We are committed to enduring this wave of violence.  We are strengthening our ability to protect the innocent victims of this process, which is the most important thing.  We will not look the other way."

Anthony Placido, intelligence chief for the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, said he wouldn't change a thing about Calderon's strategy. However, he said the Mexican president is "also fighting the clock. Public support for this can't remain high forever.  He's really got to deliver a death blow, or significant body blow, in the short term to keep the public engaged."

"In a series of national surveys, polls consistently have found a reasonable but cautious level of support for using the military in the front lines against the cartels," said pollster Dan Lund. "But in all the states where the military is actually deployed, the support goes down, sometimes dramatically."

Cartels like La Familia have tried to exploit such concerns by portraying themselves as allies of the common people. Combined with the harsh tactics used by Mexican police in the crackdown, such appeals may be effective.

"You don't have the hearts and minds of the local population," said policy analyst Carlos Heredia said.  "And if the local drug lords play Robin Hood, then you are lost.  Because the people are ultimately going to say, 'What do those officials in Mexico City care about us? They despise us.  And these drug guys, at least they give us something.'"

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by SensibleCitizen on 04 Aug 09 10:52 PM EDT
End the drug war and put the cartels out of business. Let's legalize drugs. Make treatment available at no cost to anyone who wants it. Drug prices will plummet, honest drug education will increase, and drug use will stabilize. People will always use drugs. People need an escape whether it be drugs, alcohol, sex, exercise, food, anything. Let's reduce the damage that drugs cause (mainly by being illegal) Stop this senseless war or risk destabilizing Mexico and making it the NEW colombia!

Posted by Frank Winkler on 05 Aug 09 12:24 PM EDT
I have been frankly reluctant to post again on this forum, due to the harsh censorship exercised previously against anti-legalization comments. However, I cannot ignore the comment by Sensible Citizen re the argument that legalization will somehow stop illegal drug use, the drug war, etc. Drug cartels are entrenched and powerful, and won't stop trafficking because we legalize marijuana. They also traffic in heroin, cocaine and ecstacy, among other commodities. They will continue to have the competitive upper hand, should pot become legal, and subject to taxation at the rate of $50 or more per ounce. At that rate, the cartels can easily undersell "legal" suppliers, and can boost sales potential still further simply by increasing THC percentage content, which no doubt will be regulated by the government. Pot is both rated and sold primarily on its "quality," i.e., percentage THC content. (Don't believe it? Check out any issue of "High Times", much less the myriad of books, videos, and web sites promoting marijuana cultivation and production.) And how is the local cop to determine whether a baggie of pot was obtained from the local legal supplier, or the corner pusher, or the possesser's own basement? Don't kid yourself. The "Let's legalize pot and put the Mexican cartels out of business" argument is totally without foundation- a non sequitur. But it is convenient for legalization proponents who desperately grasp at any argument that might finally enable them to buy and smoke their weed and get high without any hassle from the man-- never mind the cost to society at large.

Posted by joebanana on 05 Aug 09 03:29 PM EDT
@Frank W. It's way better to give huge tax breaks to the cartels, and kill many innocent civilians and, to prove how dangerous drugs are. Where's the logic? Pot has killed not one person, can't say the same for the government, it's killed way more than pot, why don't we ban government. Besides they're so stupid they don't even know "drugs" are a MEDICAL problem, not a criminal one, until they made it one. Again, where's the logic? $32 Billion a year, is what the government wastes on a 'war" that's been failing in every way for 30 years, logic? The CIA is spraying herbicide in Colombia, not on just cocoa, but on food crops, on people, in water wells, remember how well agent orange worked? logic? The "cost to society"? what's it cost to lock up a million non-violent drug offenders? What's the human toll in this failed war? How many tax dollars are forfeited. 25,000 different products (green products) can be made from this one plant. That's a lot of jobs. The human brain has THC receptors, for what? Everything the government spews about drugs is a lie, has been a lie, and will continue to be a lie. How many moonshiners do you know? I hear you can make a lot of money running moonshine, 80 years ago. It's kinda died of lately, seein' how it's easier to buy the stuff. And, what does it matter, "where it came from"? like crack, and powder, it's the same thing, just made different. And, ever hear the phrase " the right to pursue happiness", and as long as I cause no harm, the government has no right to infringe upon that right of mine. Drugs are not the problem, the "war on drugs" is the problem.

Posted by Pete on 06 Aug 09 03:04 PM EDT
Sorry, Joebanana, but the argument that a lot of criminals made money running moonshine 80 years ago and legalization (ie, repealing Prohibition) put them out of business is simply not based on facts. The criminal mind is nothing if not inventive when it comes to making a maximum amount of money without the need to actually do a day's honest work. Those guys who got the rug pulled out from under them in 1932 simply stepped up their efforts with illegal gambling, drug smuggling, prostitution rings, extortion, and outright robbery to keep the illegal income flowing. The legalization proponents on both sides of the US/Mexico border who sincerely believe that the drug cartel members would all go out and get honest jobs if drugs were legalized are really kidding themselves.

Posted by Frank Winkler on 06 Aug 09 04:52 PM EDT
JoeB: "Pot has killed not one person." This myth has been perpetuated by legalization pproponents for far too long. Drivers under the influlence of weed acount for a highly disproportionate percentage of accidents, injuries and fatalities- never mind the overdose cases that wind up in the ER, crime committed to obtain the stuff, etc, etc, etc. And those cannabinol receptors in the brain are there for good reason-- of which one is not to get wasted by ingesting excesssive amounts of THC far beyond what the brain could ever produce or accommodate naturally. And your "right to pursue happiness" stops when you infringe on other's rights to be safe. The cost of substance abuse on society is over $40 billion a year. That's more than I caare to spend. So why aggravate the problem further by legalizing an already proven toxic behavior.

Posted by Brandy on 10 Aug 09 12:03 PM EDT
Marijuana is a naturally grown substance with no addictive components, why when discussing the drug issue is this drug even put in the same category. As to Frank W's comments about the death tolls for driving while under the influence of weed, the death toll is much greater for an alcohol induced driver (alcohol being legal of course). Bottom line pot should be legalized with the same ramifications as an OWI when operating a vehicle while high.

Posted by David Brown on 10 Aug 09 01:33 PM EDT
I like the idea that treatment should be free, I think it would help drop the number of users here in the usa,I know people that would go to treatment if it was free.

Posted by Frank Winkler on 10 Aug 09 10:38 PM EDT
Brandy, hemlock and death cap mushrooms also grow naturally-- they're not addictive, either, but they sure are lethal. Drivers high on pot do constitute a serious and growing threat on our highways, and proponents perpetuating the myth that pot is somehow less "evil" than alcohol doesn't render it harmless--far from it, as a mountain of growing treatment and research data show only too clearly. Arguing that pot is somehow not a risk factor behind the wheel just encourages irresponsible high risk behavior. Next time you're driving, ask yourself this: "I wonder just how many drivers on the road with me right now are high?" Like the drunk driver, pot heads, too, easily convince themselves that they can drive just fine. Its always going to be the other guy who loses his concentration, perception and reaction response. All well and good-- until he hits you.

Posted by John on 11 Aug 09 03:18 PM EDT
There is no such thing as free. I'm on the board of directors for a local female Res. Tx. facility and we tried mightily to have a majority of scholarship beds and quickly almost went out of business. There are virtully no funds available to assist this effort.Like I said no such thing as free, someone has to pay.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines