Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Company Designs Filter to Remove Some Cigarette Toxins
November 5, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

A Hong Kong biotech firm has designed a filter that removes some of the toxic chemicals from cigarette smoke but leaves the tobacco flavor intact, Forbes reports in its upcoming Nov. 16 issue.

The company, Filigent, has developed the MicroBlue filter, which biochemically attracts and traps carcinogens in tobacco smoke. Research has shown that Filigent's Generation 3 filter removes 40-75 percent of the chemicals known to cause DNA mutations, for example.

"For years the public health community has just assumed that the smoke from cigarettes is all bad," said Scott Ballin, director for the Alliance for Health, Economic & Agriculture Development, a group funded by tobacco-state interests. "Now advances in basic science have given us a much more nuanced understanding of what's in that stuff -- what's harmful and what's mainly benign."

Only a fraction of smokers who try to quit actually succeed, so products like MicroBlue could improve smokers' health without them really noticing. "People normally hate reduced-harm cigarettes. But this is different: It does not affect the flavor or the nicotine experience at all," said Canadian tobacco distributor Edward Roundpoint, a Filigent customer.

"We are in the business of saving lives," said Filigent CEO Melissa Mowbray-d'Arbela.

Worldwide, the cigarette filter business is worth $9 billion. The Fact brand of so-called 'reduced risk' cigarette used a Filigent filter when it went on the market in 2005, but state attorneys general got the product pulled from the marketplace on charges of making unsubstantiated health claims.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by maxwood on 05 Nov 09 09:22 PM EST
This summary does not mention toxin #1, carbon monoxide; how could that be filtered out? Nevertheless I wish them luck, any improvement is better than death on the left and prohibition on the right.

Posted by Gina King on 06 Nov 09 10:34 AM EST
This is great. I am glad they are doing this, but I also think that electronic cigarettes have already solved this problem, but are not getting the proper recognition for it. Why is the FDA against e-cigs, but will more than likely grant these guys permission to market these cigs in the US.

Posted by rlberry on 06 Nov 09 06:53 PM EST
I don't believe the e-cigs have solved any problem but only created new ones. There is still harmful chemicals in the product. The box these products are packaged in still say "may cause lung cancer". But that is one thing the salesmen neglects to tell you. I think the FDA is conducting studies on this product.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Submissions are held for review and approval.
Please read the guidelines before posting.

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments