Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Canadian Conservatives Seek Mandatory Sentences for Drug Crimes
May 1, 2009

Share Share Email
email
Print
print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Referring to marijuana as "the currency that is used to bring other more serious drugs into the country," Rob Nicholson, the Canadian justice minister, and members of Canada's Conservative party are pushing to introduce harsh minimum-sentencing laws for drug crimes, the Vancouver Sun reported April 23.

The Conservatives have proposed legislation that would impose a one-year mandatory jail sentence for selling marijuana that is linked to organized crime, or when a weapon is involved. The sentence would be increased to two years for dealing drugs like cocaine, heroin or methamphetamines to young people, or selling drugs near a school.

The legislation also proposes a six-month mandatory sentence for growing one to 200 marijuana plants to sell, and two years for growers of 500 plants or more.

Critics contended that the proposed legislation would not just target large dealers, but would send individual drug users to provincial prisons, where few treatment programs are available.

In a recent hearing, Libby Davies, a New Democrat from British Columbia, repeatedly asked Nicholson whether he has any evidence that minimum mandatory jail terms reduce crime. Davies said studies prepared for Canada's Justice Department showed that harsh drug sentences proved ineffective in the U.S. "Many states are repealing their mandatory minimums," Davies said.

Nicholson said Canadians are confused about the legal status of smoking marijuana due to the initiative of the former Liberal government to decriminalize marijuana possession, and that his legislation "sends a strong message." 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Don on 02 May 09 11:16 AM EDT
There is not enough money in selling marijuana to bring any stronger drugs unless you are growing that 500 plants you wrote about now selling heroin or methamphetamines or crack cocaine they should go to jail but ones use of marijuana does not hurt anyone

Posted by stopthehate on 04 May 09 12:36 PM EDT
What is wrong with conservatives that they don't feel any need to use evidence based practices?

Posted by 2bits on 04 May 09 03:16 PM EDT
Don your last few words are dead wrong. Marijuana use does hurt people. Marijuana is addictive. Marijuana changes people. Those people have families and those families are changed by the drug using member. Familes make up communities. Families create communities and community standards. People in a community either live up to or down to the accepted standards of that community. That's why people who want to use the weed work so hard to normalize it in the community. Stopthehate ... Evidence based practices are good ... such as employing motivational therapy practices with adolescents in treatment for marijuana. People who are addicted to drugs need treatment. Society needs to understand that it isn't enough to take the seagull out of the oilspill and clean him off. You have to clean up the oil spill before you throw him back in the water or he will likely get right back in trouble. The same goes for people and drugs. If we don't stop moving toward social norms that say it is okay to use or sell drugs ... including marijuana ... then we are going to continue to see people drowning in addiction. Evidence based practice shows that effective environmental strategies to reduce use and delay the onset of initial use include reducing access.

Posted by quartermaster on 04 May 09 05:18 PM EDT
pot users gave us the PC, it has never killed anyone. pills kill. have they been conservative with our ground troops? or our tax dollars. its more republican crap, ban the republican terrorist. vote them out of power everywhere and we can be blessed with freedom again.

Posted by Brinna on 04 May 09 07:49 PM EDT
YES! 2bits. Sitting around on a couch, staring blankly straight ahead, eating empty calorie snacks, being totally unproductive for an average of 29 hours a week IS bad. Very bad! YES! Television use does hurt people. Television use is addictive. Television use changes people! YES! We must throw people in jail for watching TV. It is for their own good, and sends the right message to the children.

Posted by Anonymous on 04 May 09 08:40 PM EDT
Sending the right message is an impressive cliche right (wing)politicians like to use. Meanwhile, every government crackdown against cannabis sends children the message that society, for whatever reason, prefers you get hooked on hot burning overdose nicotine cigarettes.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 05 May 09 04:19 PM EDT
2bits great comment, you get it.

Posted by Steve Coulter on 08 May 09 09:10 AM EDT
"Referring to marijuana as 'the currency that is used to bring other more serious drugs into the country,' Rob Nicholson, the Canadian justice minister, and members of Canada's Conservative party are pushing to introduce harsh minimum-sentencing laws" Wrong. The Netherlands experience demonstrates clearly that bringing cannabis under a regulatory scheme removes it from the black market channels that carry crack, heroin and methamphetamine, and carry those to minors. When cannabis is available only in well-regulated shops that do not serve kids and do not have other addictive substances, far fewer people in society become addicted to these other substances. Good regulation is the anti-gateway, if you will. The debate on this really shouldn't include the word "legalization"--people envision joints being sold at CVS next to the Mylanta. What's needed is for commonly-used, currently illegal substances to be made available under tightly regulated conditions, as with firearms. The term to use is "regulation," not "legalization."

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 10 May 09 07:09 AM EDT
This issue should be looked at the same as the 18th Amendment. A once legal substance made illegal for "moral" reasons doesn't always turn out the way it was intended. By making something illegal which was once legal does nothing to STOP the activities, but sends it to the dirty underground (black market) Lets do what had to be done to save our society during prohibition and REPEAL. Regulation is the word, but I DO NOT want "OUR" government regulating ANYTHING. REPUBLICANS as well as DEMOCRATS are screwing up everything they touch and socially engineering this country in a manner that would have our Founding Fathers turning over in their graves.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Submissions are held for review and approval.
Please read the guidelines before posting.

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments