Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Calif. Marijuana 'Legalize and Tax' Bill Languishes in Legislature
April 14, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

A California bill to legalize and tax marijuana, introduced in February by a state Assemblyman, has failed to attract any cosponsors in the state legislature, the San Francisco Chronicle reported April 12.

Still, Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco), who introduced the bill, plans to hold a hearing on the measure in late fall or early winter; Ammiano has two years to build support for the legislation.

In his efforts to sway conservative lawmakers, Ammiano has spoken of the economic benefits of marijuana legalization, the prospect of reducing drug-related violence, and the effect that legalization would have on drug cartels.

Recent polls have shown growing support for marijuana legalization in California. However, Republican Party consultant Rob Stutzman is not convinced that sufficient grassroots support exists to change the law. "People who want to use marijuana are finding it and not having that much trouble using it," said Stutzman, an adviser to California gubernatorial hopeful Meg Whitman.

Ammiano said that some fellow legislators have privately expressed support for his bill, but are not ready to commit publicly. "If we're hemorrhaging money and doing this wink-wink, nod-nod all these years, it's about time we start harvesting this," he said. "And admit to the fact that it's going to be around and if we regulate and tax it, and decriminalize it, we could have not only an economic benefit but a policy benefit."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by David Turner on 15 Apr 09 08:58 AM EDT
I lived in Tennessee during the 197s Mideast gas embargo, the last state to comply with the US 55mph highway speed limit. In the end they too caved. Why? Because the feds threatened to withhold highway federal highway funds for construction and repair. The promoter for this bill, conveniently overlooking the obvious drug use connection between weed and other street drugs, claims a revenue boost to the California economy. and how will that boost compare with the loss of federal revenues for violating federal law? Marijuana is proven more harmful to the smoker than even cigarettes. Legalizing alcohol following prohibition increased crime. It also resulted in a dramatic increase in health, family and personal and psychological problems for the addict. With no social benefit to wider use of marijuana, except for the pot-head politicians and other white collar advocates, whats in it for society?

Posted by Cassandra Miller on 15 Apr 09 10:01 AM EDT
There are no health risks from smoking Marijuana. It is given by doctors to cancer patients. The people who talk badly about the drug are people who have never used it. There are way more health risk factors in the use of alcohol, cigerettes and prescription drugs. The reason that weed has not been legalized yet is because we dont grow the good stuff and we would have to inport the soil and the seeds to grow the good stuff. Legalizing Marijuana not only will boost the economy, but it will also lower crime and costs to tax payers that have to pay for people in prison every year for selling it. It is going to be around regardless of what we do about it so I think they should just legalize it and put tax and regulations on it and start helping everyone in the process.

Posted by David Turner on 15 Apr 09 01:14 PM EDT
Cassandra, think smoke for starts. Smoking in any form is obviously not healthy. The burning of any organic product, from tobacco to marijuana to cocaine creates tar. Tar inhaled coats the lungs and causes emphsema. And thats just for starts. The drug also impacts the functioning of the brain, causes ohter physical damage and is five times more likely to cause that birth condition known as FAC, fetal alcohol syndrome that alcohol itself. As to physicians prescribing the drug, I already included that minority when I referred to pothead professionals. No other physician would have his/her senses so disturbed as to risk losing their license for violating federal law and professional ethics.

Posted by Verde on 16 Apr 09 12:41 AM EDT
The economy thrived beyond belief without marijuana. Not an excuse to go to legalizing drugs now. Say no and keep saying no to drugs, especially pot. If you like natural god given herbs try something else.

Posted by Brinna on 19 Apr 09 02:07 AM EDT
Cannabis is not a drug.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines