Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Calif. Gubernatorial Candidates Cool to Legalization
August 10, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

None of the leading candidates for governor of California have embraced marijuana legalization despite polls showing majority support for the concept and predictions that legalizing and taxing the drug could generate $1.4 billion in annual revenues for the state, the San Francisco Chronicle reported Aug. 8.

Even Jerry Brown -- the liberal icon, former governor and current attorney general who backed a law establishing minimal penalties for marijuana possession -- dismissed the idea. "If the whole society starts getting stoned, we're going to be even less competitive," said Brown. San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom has called for thinking current drug policies but opposes marijuana legalization.

Republican Tom Campbell has supported funding for addiction treatment over interdiction and jailing drug offenders, but warns that legalizing marijuana will only strengthen Mexican drug cartels. Meg Whitman, former CEO of eBay and another GOP candidate, said,  "I am absolutely against legalizing marijuana for any reason. We have enough challenges in our society without heading down the path of drug legalization."

Finally, a spokesperson for Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner said, "The idea of legalizing drugs is one more bad idea from a bygone era. Nor can California smoke its way out of the structural budget deficit."

California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano has generated a great deal of press and attention with his bill to legalize and tax marijuana, but has not been able to attract a single legislative cosponsor.

"Supporting legalization probably risks losing [candidates] the support of law enforcement," said Dale Gieringer, the California coordinator for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. "I think opposing it is going to turn off some younger voters ... the public's perceptions are always ahead of the politicians."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Dwayne on 11 Aug 09 08:26 AM EDT
If they dont do what the voters say get rid of them or don't pay them remember they work for the people

Posted by Vetanalyst on 11 Aug 09 11:10 AM EDT
And I suppose that a new marijuana industry and its allies will allow legislative bodies to levy taxes on their products without a fight? Come on folks, look at the history of alcohol excise taxes and compare the revenue from that source with the harm caused by the product. Then look at how both fiscal conservatives and progressives have reacted to proposals for increased rates in recent years. How many rates have been increased since 1990? Not a perfect parallel, but there are lessons to be learned.

Posted by Eric Wood on 11 Aug 09 02:40 PM EDT
The lesson to be learned is alcohol is problematic, too -- not that marijuana is the miracle solution since it wouldn't be as problematic as alcohol. Finally, the Left Coast is beginning to speak with reason about this subject, and from Jerry Brown, no less!

Posted by Kathleen Roberts on 11 Aug 09 03:42 PM EDT
I have experienced severe migraine headaches since the age of five after suffering a frontal lobe concussion that went untreated. All of my life I have tried to find an answer for relief. At the age of thirty I had already taken every drug used for migraine headache with no success. Finally, an MD acquaintance gave me marijuana and I could not believe how much better I felt. So much money has been spent here in the US to demonize marijuana that I think education of the benefits of marijuana for people like me is essential. I truly believe that the Pharmaceutical industry would lose about 80% of their drug arsenal if marijuana were legalized or decriminalized. The documentary, American Drug War,(2007) shows how much money is being made by private industry and the US government by penalizing and profiting off of the citizens themselves. I'll know we have made the quantum leap to true Health Care when marijuana is legalized. I do not fear a driver who may have "smoked" and drive, but fear the person who has ingested alcohol. I have just come out of a ten year constant use of opiates from a pain specialist. I lost ten years of my life. Marijuana has kept me alive.

Posted by Brinna Nanda on 11 Aug 09 06:48 PM EDT
Ah . . . the left coast, as opposed to the not so bright coast?

Posted by maxwood on 11 Aug 09 08:20 PM EDT
1. Re: the disappointing comment from Brown (compare that other Brown, the one in England)-- why assume everyone is going to get "stoned" (stunned), maybe most users, once no longer afraid of their equipment being seen, will switch from easy-to-hide hot-burning-overdose papers to a vaporizer and NO ONE will get stoned. 2. Note use of term "drug" by GOP Whitman--why not emphasize that cannabis is a Nutritional Supplement? 3. Time to think "either-or"-- legalized cannabis could lead to a drastic reduction in use of alcohol by minors and drivers, and then (a) Big 2Wackgo will lose the benefit of binge-drinking as a contributing cause to nicotine addiction, (b) the auto industry will make less money replacing wrecked cars, and (c) Big pHARMa will make less money selling drugs to control chronic cigarette diseases, such as high blood pressure etc.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 12 Aug 09 02:04 PM EDT
The poll is done by legalizers and the 1.4 billion is from made up numbers given to the Board of Equalization by NORMAL. Cartels are not going to pay taxes, they will undercut the price of the so called legal weed, and the weed smokers are not going to pay $50 more for legal weed because they care so much and want to help out the State of California.

Posted by Eric Wood on 17 Aug 09 12:56 PM EDT
Kathleen, I do not dispute you have received a medical benefit from your use of cannabis. Please recognize we are talking about two separate issues: medical marijuana and legalized recreational use of marijuana. You are unfortunately caught in the middle of this argument and being used as a pawn by advocates of recreational use. Maxwood: What the heck are you talking about???

Posted by Bert Massiah on 17 Aug 09 01:21 PM EDT
Pathetic. The only long term solution to the world of drug addiction is to cut the profit issue. Legalize all addictive substances, develop clear and enforcable regulations that cover all aspects of the production and distribution of these substances and use the millions of dollars of taxes to improve our treatment and educational programs. No profits for the underworld and they lose and we, the average citizen, wins!!

Posted by qkruse on 17 Aug 09 02:09 PM EDT
Again, and again we are teased with false equivalencies.....Why, please why will everyone suddenly turn to getting high on marijuana should it become legal....Is there really that level of unmet demand just waiting for the stroke of a pen..... To my mind the issue is to take it out of the dark alleys and deal with it in an open and above board fashion....take the gazillion dollars that we are currently spending on eradication and interdiction and incarceration and use it to create drug resistant kids and to treat those who desire and need it...

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines