Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Boycott Kellogg for Dropping Phelps, Drug Reformers Say
February 12, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Drug-policy reform groups have organized a consumer boycott against Kellogg Co. -- a protest against the company's decision to end its sponsorship deal with Michael Phelps after the Olympic swimmer was photographed smoking from a bong -- the Associated Press reported Feb. 11.

The Marijuana Policy Project says thousands of signatures have been gathered on an online petition calling for the boycott. "Kellogg's had no problem signing up Phelps when he had a [past] conviction for drunk driving, an illegal act that could actually have killed someone," said Rob Kampia, MPP's executive director. "To drop him for choosing to relax with a substance that's safer than beer is an outrage."

The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, Students for Sensible Drug Policy, and the Drug Policy Alliance also are backing the boycott.

"It's not just that Michael Phelps did what millions of other twenty-somethings do," said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance. "It's that he did what over one hundred million Americans have done at least once in their lives, including the president, former presidents, members of the U.S. Congress, and Supreme Court."

Kellogg's officials did not comment on the boycott. "Our contract with Michael Phelps was set to expire at the end of February and we made a business decision not to extend that contract," according to a spokesperson.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Bill Bittner on 13 Feb 09 08:40 AM EST
I cannot believe this. Why any sane person would be critical of Kellogg's for taking a stand against using drugs is beyond me.Wake up, no drug use is right and I give them credit for saying this. Prevention is first,you will never have problem with your second use of drugs if there is no first time. Think of the message to our youth, hey it is ok to use drugs because we did it!!!!!!!

Posted by Karen G. on 13 Feb 09 09:32 AM EST
Interesting that their argument is that marijuana is "safer than beer". How does one even put the word 'safe' in the same sentence as any drug that is an inebriant?

Posted by Karen on 13 Feb 09 09:38 AM EST
Until advocates of marijuana use admit health consequences related to pot, they will continue making absurd statements that beer is more harmful. Phelps has an addiction problem -- the DUI is an indicator that he needs intervention . . .I applaud Kellogg . . . Phelps DUI wasn't widely known until the bong incident. Beer also is a LEGAL substance . . .hopefully, Phelps will get the help he needs

Posted by Pam S. on 13 Feb 09 09:45 AM EST
The kids we work with are already saying "Well, Michael Phelps smokes pot and look at what he has accomplished" Kelloggs is a family company and of course they are going to want someone to represent that image how do they not get that!

Posted by Bill Godshall on 13 Feb 09 10:37 AM EST
Would those who praise Kellogs for conceding to drug war hysteria similarly heap praise on a company that fired someone for smoking a cigarette, which is far more addictive than pot, and which actually kills users? I didn't think so.

Posted by jrzshor on 13 Feb 09 10:42 AM EST
this is a perfect example as to why drugs are bad for you. you just believe that every silly thing is just best greatest thing ever!

Posted by Larry on 13 Feb 09 10:44 AM EST
In the current economy, businesses are looking for ways to reduce expenses in the near term. Sponsorship deals don't sell more cereal. The bottom line may have been the true deciding factor here.

Posted by Concerned but Rational on 13 Feb 09 10:47 AM EST
It is absurd to justify drinking alcohol simply because it is LEGAL! It is more absurd to diagnose an adolescent as an addict because he behaved in a manner characteristic of his age group. Millions of kids are arrested on DUI charges, most of them are killed because of drunk driving, all due to a LEGAL substance. A balanced argument is one that honestly acknowledges harm, not sensationalizing the effects to support an argument in favor of a LEGAL substance. No wonder the DARE campaign failed so miserably; fear alone won't deter people from experimenting. Regardless of the absurdity, I commend Kellogg's for standing behind their principles; that's their right.

Posted by Kellogg's get's my vote on 13 Feb 09 11:01 AM EST
I will start buying Kellogg's products! We must stop sending mixed messages to our children. How many people have smoked or inhaled pot and continued to use and abuse drugs? Why advertise the MMP boycott on this web site?

Posted by Working with youth on 13 Feb 09 11:50 AM EST
Experience tells me that both substances are a problem for our youth. Kellogg's can do what they want about endorsements and I support them 100%. The message is clear. Pretending that marijuana has no negative consequences is absurd...

Posted by Susan on 13 Feb 09 12:23 PM EST
I remember well when my children (who are now non-drug using adults, around Phelps' age) used the argument that "other people do it..." to justify doing something I was prohibiting. I thought it was just as ridiculous then as it appears to me in this aricle today! My goodness, our downward spiral is picking up speed every single day...

Posted by FieldsofOH on 13 Feb 09 12:28 PM EST
I believe that Kellogs has every right to drop Phelps. Its there company. I'm more upset that Phelps says he did something wrong. You fix drug abuse by educating the youth, and everyone, about drugs and the repercussions of abusing them. All things in modertation. To many Pop Tarts will make you a large person in time so I really don't bilieve taking the choice from the person is going to save the person, just make them more curious. And through my 15 some odd years of adult life Marijuana has been safer to me. I've been a heavy drinker and a marijuana smoker and the worst things in my life happened to me, when I was drunk. Peace and love with the MJ. I would much rather have my soon to be teenagers partake of the herb vs getting some shmo, of age, to buy them alcohol and do God knows what. You smoke a joint, have a buzz for a couple of hours, eat some Pop Tarts, and take a nap. But no, some folks insist on ruining my life over MJ.Peace.

Posted by Margaret on 13 Feb 09 12:38 PM EST
Reefer Madness is alive and well on this comment page! Over 100 million American adults have consumed marijuana at some point. To state that fact is not to encourage marijuana use. But it should make us ask the obvious question: is it right to call these over 100 million American adults "criminals"? Really? It's laws like these that explain why 1 in 100 adults in this country is behind bars. We should all just calm down. That would do our children a whole lot more good than raising them in a terrified state.

Posted by dbeaupre' on 13 Feb 09 12:40 PM EST
Kelloggs and others are once again taking drug use and making it a moral/punitive issue when they could have seized the opportunity to open some dialogue WITH teens THRU Michael Phelps. Haven't we learned yet that the old model of shaming and punishment DO NOT WORK with adults and sure as hell don't work with teens...I know, I've watched SA "professionals" chase clients out the door with this archaic approach.

Posted by Jason Blanchette on 13 Feb 09 03:25 PM EST
That's a great point, dbeaupre. I didn't think of that myself, but as a community prevention specialist I want to reiterate what was said, "kellog's could have used this opportunity to engage in a discussion WITH teens through Phelps." But, I'd like to add that the discussion could have included the DUI and abuse/addiction.

Posted by jeffrey N. Kushner on 13 Feb 09 04:10 PM EST
Good for Kelloggs shame on VISA, HILTON, SUBWAY and other sponsor of Phelps. For 40 years I have seen the devastation caused by use of Tetrahydrocanabbinol and everyday there is a new study out about problems caused. I will start buying Kellogg products, too.

Posted by FieldsofOH on 15 Feb 09 09:50 AM EST
Some of you may appriciate the reading you will find if you Google "granny storm crow's list" . The cannabis culture isn't going away. Peace.

Posted by Aisling Group International, Ireland on 16 Feb 09 02:16 PM EST
By having consequences for actions people generally discover that they need to think about being responsible for what they do and how it effects others. Kelloggs didnt do this to him. He earned their decision by what he chose. This is an easy lesson. There are much harder when you continue using drugs. It is good for him and the general public who look up to him. 'A stitch in time saves nine'.

Posted by Sue on 16 Feb 09 09:35 PM EST
Funny how differently Phelps and swimming are being treated compared to baseball players and steriods. We have to get consistent to have any intergrity.

Posted by Bob Boivin on 06 Mar 09 07:28 PM EST
Kelloggs did not make the law you disagree with they just took a stand about who they treat as a symbol of health and the behaviors they feel should be canonized. They would have done the same thing regardless of the law broken, would people be upset if he had raped someone or stole something. A crime was committed consequences should be expected.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines