Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Agassi Drug Revelation Earns Criticism from Tennis Peers
November 2, 2009

Share Share Email
email
Print
print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Tennis champion Andre Agassi's admission of drug use more than a decade ago has caused confusion and condemnation among current and former tennis pros, including some who have been professed admirers of his career.

In his forthcoming autobiography, Agassi admits that he once used crystal methamphetamine in 1997, during a low point in his personal and professional life. "There is a moment of regret, followed by vast sadness," said Agassi in describing the experience of using the drug. "Then comes a tidal wave of euphoria that sweeps away every negative thought in my head. I've never felt so alive, so hopeful -- and I've never felt such energy."

Later, when an ATP drug test came back positive for use of the recreational drug, Agassi lied to tennis officials, saying he ingested the drug accidentally, Reuters reported Oct. 28. "I feel ashamed, of course. I promise myself that this lie is the end of it," Agassi recalled. Agassi was never punished for drug use during his career.

The Australian reported Oct. 31 that reaction from the tennis world was mixed, with fellow Hall of Fame player Martina Navatralova offering an especially harsh assessment.

"It's not as much shock that he did it as shock he lied about it and didn't own up to it," said Navatralova. "He's up there with Roger Clemens, as far as I'm concerned. Andre lied and got away with it. You can't correct that now. Do you take away a title he wouldn't have won if he had been suspended? He beat some people when he should have been suspended."

Current world number-one player Roger Federer said it "was a shock when I heard the news."

"I am disappointed and I hope there are no more such cases in the future. Our sport must stay clean," Federer said. Superstar Rafael Nadal added, "Cheaters must be punished and if Agassi was a cheater during his career, he should have been punished.

"To me it seems terrible," Nadal added. "Why is he saying this now that he has retired? It's a way of damaging the sport that makes no sense. I believe our sport is clean and I am the first one that wants that."

Agassi's former coach, Nick Bollettieri, said that Agassi's admission should be weighed against the rest of his life's work. "Let's look at what Andre has done; he funds a school for 400 kids from the inner-city. I know underneath he's a hell of guy," he said.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Stephanie Weiss on 03 Nov 09 09:10 AM EST
Later, when an ATP drug test came back positive for use of the recreational drug, If you think is Meth is a recreational drug, then you all smoking something.

Posted by Peter on 03 Nov 09 09:16 AM EST
Yes he made errors, but he should not be condemmed fornow coming forward and telling the truth. Is that not what a major part of recovery is about - coming to grips with what has gone wrong and being honest about it? Sure, those he beat can be upset, but let us not pund on someone for reaching a point of honesty

Posted by Young on 03 Nov 09 11:22 AM EST
I am appalled by the real info we give out to our kids while professing that meth is bad for them. Agassi is saying to our kids that meth gives you "... a tidal wave of euphoria that sweeps away every negative thought..." It makes you so alive, so hopeful -- such energy." Secondly he is telling our kids you can lie to win and you can later confess when you know that nobody can do anything about it. Amazingly Join Together who should know better is reinforcing this bad info by calling meth a recreational drug!

Posted by Diane on 03 Nov 09 02:44 PM EST
Keep in mind that this event happened in 1997 when very little was known about meth, including how terrible a problem it can become for an individual, so of course it was considered recreational. One mistake does not change my opinion about Agassi or anybody else, and it doesn't put him in the same category as Clemens who used steroids for years and doctored his UA's to avoid detection. Even Agassi's lie is understandable. How many of you have NEVER lied about something to avoid getting in trouble, especially at work? Furthermore, how many of you can honestly say you have never tried an illicit drug, such as drinking before you were 21 or smoking pot, or maybe driving when you were buzzed on alcohol? Some of you need to get off your high horses. I'll bet some of you are the same people who complain about the moral theory of addiction, yet you have no problem invoking the same moral theory for one-time use. How hypocritical.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 03 Nov 09 04:10 PM EST
I think I agree with Diane except for one thing. We knew alot about Meth in 1997. Here in San diego it was the drug of choice since the early 80's. It's just wasn't on the east coast so the government really didn't care about it. When it hit the east coast in 2000 that's when everyone got up in armes about how distructive it is. Not to mention when the biker clubs were taken out of the picture with Operation Triple Neck the Mexican Cartels saw an opening and the problem grew ten times worse. As for Agassi I'm sure the quote was taken out of context and he had negitive things to say about the drug also.

Posted by Ron Arden on 09 Nov 09 12:07 AM EST
Meth is a recreational drug and is not performance enhancing. Would he be as roundly condemned by an arrogant Navatralova if he had resorted to heavy drinking to self-medicate or taking the many other medications available through doctors? A little more of "There but for the Grace of God Go I" is in order. How many would voluntarily open there cupboards to reveal the skeletons they hide? A great tennis player, a great philanthropist, a great gentleman.

Posted by MJ on 09 Nov 09 12:47 PM EST
He who is without sin, cast the first stone. I'm quite certain that no sport is without drugs. It's only when someone is caught, or admits using that it's ever revealed. No drug is recreational. And all drugs provide the opportunity for addiction.

Posted by Nicole on 09 Nov 09 01:11 PM EST
I am not understanding the uproar, is this all about a single use of meth or a more long standing drug abuse history? I think it is brave and honest that he has now told the truth. Yes, meth is clearly more dangerous then he likely suspected at the time of his use, but luckily for him it sounds like he avoided the addiction and suffering that so many others could not. The more serious issue it seems, is the professional lie, and I think we can all understand why he would have lied. Rather than suspecting him of trying to smear the tennis profession with the truth, I think it is clear that he is now trying to be honest that some of the glory in his career shouldn't have been his and that he is regretful about his actions. A description of euphoria upon ones first use of a substance is not glorifying it, its honest. That is why people get addicted, we as professionals and/or individuals in recovery know that! And the words recreational drug use don't come from Join Together, it is the official classification from the APT at the time to differentiate between performance-enhancing and other illicit drug use.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Submissions are held for review and approval.
Please read the guidelines before posting.

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments