Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Acting Drug Czar Named by Bush
January 15, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Report
by Bob Curley

Just days before the inauguration of Barack Obama, President George Bush named the White House's point person on drug supply reduction to serve as acting director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP).

With current "drug czar" John Walters set to depart ONDCP on Jan. 20 -- along with the man who appointed him -- Bush announced on Jan. 12 that Patrick M. Ward, currently acting deputy director for supply reduction at ONDCP, would become acting director of the agency.

Ward, a former career Air Force officer, joined ONDCP's supply-reduction team in 2005 and assumed his current job title in December 2007.

According to his biography, Ward "is responsible for reducing the supply of illicit drugs in the U.S. In this role, Mr. Ward provides executive leadership in the interagency and international environment. His office is responsible for the development of national policy and strategy, focusing and overseeing all U.S. programs and activities involved in achieving the supply reduction goals of the National Drug Control Strategy, and countering the nexus between illegal drugs and terrorism."

Ward's temporary appointment has done little to clear up uncertainty about who Obama will name as his drug czar, nor does it quell the growing consternation in the field over the lack of a nominee for the job. Obama has named nearly every other member of his Cabinet, as well as White House officials as obscure as the official photographer, but still has not offered any hint about the future direction of ONDCP.

Sources continue to tell Join Together that former Rep. Jim Ramstad (R-Minn.) and former Maryland Lt. Gov. Kathleen Kennedy Townshend remain candidates for the position of ONDCP director, but also note that the Obama transition team has been very tightlipped about the nomination process and a timeframe for choosing a candidate. The transition team officially ends its work on Inauguration Day.

Ramstad's putative candidacy has attracted the most public attention, with some drug-policy reform groups announcing their opposition while the group Wellstone Action recently publicly endorsed Ramstad for the job.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Boogie on 16 Jan 09 08:25 AM EST
I think who ever is named Drug Czar should be person who has no prior substance abuse problems of any kind and be a family orientated, kid friendly person and understand the way out of this problem is not by throwing good money after peoples bad choices but rather stopping them from making bad choices in the first place. We need a person who knows and believes that "Prevention is the Best Treament" stopping bad choices before they happens saves lives and money. ($$$$billions)

Posted by Pamela on 16 Jan 09 09:20 AM EST
I don't think we need a "drug czar" at all! What we need is a program that will significantly decrease demand. As long as there is high demand for illegal substances, there will be people trying to get the product to them.

Posted by Bruce Talbot on 16 Jan 09 10:18 AM EST
What we need is a person who can bridge the gap between the various camps (ranging from demand reduction on the right to drug legalization on the left) so we can stop the sniping among folks attempting to reduce drug abuse. My fear is we get a retread Clinton administration appointment who comes up with another "midnight basketball" funding program.

Posted by DD on 16 Jan 09 10:18 AM EST
Since the past drug czars (going back to the Nixon administration) have mostly focused on interdiction and punishment, more so than prevention and treatment. and we are not particularly better off than we were 30 years ago, maybe the criteria should include "won't keep doing the same thing, hoping for different results".

Posted by Shari Bradstream on 16 Jan 09 11:12 AM EST
Being a CD counselor and on several state and one national committee I feel the comment from Bruce about "sniping" may be "off the radar" where I come from. Smaller towns and cities and less populated states are networking efficiently and making inroads to alcohol/drug reduction. Collaboration appears to be the motivating factor in our successes.

Posted by Luis M. Lozano on 16 Jan 09 01:44 PM EST
Another Trojan Horse gift from Bush. Isn't it obvious that the current strategy in the so-called War on Drugs has been a dimal failure in reducing supply and demand. I hope Obama can steer this effort in another direction; one that will give us a more rational policy that does not criminalize addicts and one that will end the violence undo the drug cartels.

Posted by Rob H. on 16 Jan 09 05:00 PM EST
Prevention is the key...demand reduction is the solution. Problem is, if we cut back on supply reduction efforts, we'll be swamped with more drugs, cheaper drugs than are available now. Nor can we take money away from treatment to fund new prevention/demand reduction efforts. Yes, we need more treatment, but it's sad that our President-elect has bought into the myth that "our prisons are full of non-violent drug offenders." If you're doing time in a federal prison, you got caught with sale weight, or pleaded down from serious non-drug charges. You may need treatment...but you most definitely need incarceration. It's about responsibility.

Posted by skywritertoo on 16 Jan 09 06:10 PM EST
I agree we need a Drug Czar that has been there done that or has a family member who has suffered with addiction. One that realizes paying for treatment saves $$. Also saves lives by preventing the spread of aids, HCV etc. Insist medicare,medicaid & pvt.health ins. pays for substance abuse including medication assisted treatment,

Posted by unspun hero on 19 Jan 09 03:22 PM EST
Treatment is important, incarceration is sometimes neccessary and interdiction is sometimes a very real national security issue. A candidate for Director ONDCP should be able to find balance... more treatment in jails and prisons is one answer and mandatory sentencing for manufaturing another. The chemical dependence problem in America is complex and must be dealt with in a manner that heals our country and helps those suffering become the productive, happy and purposeful members of society.

Posted by Brinna Nanda on 19 Jan 09 10:00 PM EST
First of all, we should declare the "War on Drugs" over. War is stupid, harms people, is a darling of manufacturers of weaponry, and solves no problems. By now we should all realize that War only benefits corporations. This War is not about harm reduction. This War is about profits trumping human welfare.

Posted by George Richardson on 20 Jan 09 12:01 PM EST
These posts seem to outline the complexity of the problem effectively, although inclusion or recognition of the complex may not have been intended in some cases. There is NO majic bullet. We have current problems that must be solved, as all people make bad choices, or mistakes, and we have future problems to prevent. Inclusive theories of how to move forward will work best. If one believes there is mainly one aspect of addiction and substance abuse that needs remedy, I suggest that nothing in life is so simple.

Posted by Henry Steinberger from Madison WI on 21 Jan 09 01:10 AM EST
Tom McLellan and Jon Morgenstern according to psychologist John Bellamy Taylor, are brilliant centrists (in the area of public health policy - prevention and and science based approach). "If respectively designated "drug czar" and SAMHSA director, these extraordinarily accomplished men would be well matched with much of the incoming national administration, and we might realistically expect to leap more than a few light years into the future of public health." I concure with Dr. Taylor. President Obama in his speech today said he wanted to put science first, so I and many others who want to really help and not just spend tax money on a failed so-called war on drugs hope and pray that readers here and elsewhere carry this messageothe new administration.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines