Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 
Vt. Committee Approves Study of Lower Drinking Age
March 28, 2008

Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

State liquor officials call it a waste of time, but a Vermont Senate committee has approved legislation that would establish a task force to study the possibility of lowering the state's legal drinking age from 21 to 18, U-Wire reported March 28.

Under the measure introduced by Sen. Hinda Miller, the five-member panel would look at underage and binge drinking in the context of the legal drinking age. If Vermont did eventually lower its drinking age, the state would face the loss of about $17 million in federal highway funds unless Congress grants a waiver to the penalty, which was imposed in the 1980s to compel states to adopt age-21 drinking laws.

William Goggins, director of education and enforcement for the state Liquor Control Board, opposes both Miller's bill and lowering the state's drinking age. "I think it's irresponsible and a waste of valuable time," he said.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Ed on 14 Apr 08 04:14 PM EDT
Adreene, alcohol abuse can harm your brain no matter what age. But that doesn't mean denying altogether any adults who want to drink moderately.

Posted by Adreeene on 31 Mar 08 12:13 PM EDT
I cannot believe how many people are still making the argument that because kids are legally considered adults at age 18 that it means they should be able to drink, THEY SHOULD NOT. The studies on the brain aren't just something that the prevention field made up to try and get kids not to drink, it is actual science. Now that we know the brain is still developing into the 20s maybe we should reconsider at what age we call people adults but we definitely should NOT reconsider the age at which it is legal to drink. BAD IDEA VERMONT!

Posted by Anonymous on 31 Mar 08 11:45 AM EDT
True, the decisions of some under-21 adults can be questionable at times, but I question the decisions of those running our country and they supposedly have degrees and are definitely over 21! I say it's all or none; if our government thinks it's OK to have these kids in adult roles such as in marriage or the battlefield, then treat them as adults in all areas. These kids are going to get alcohol somehow and when they are in college with kids over 21, where do you suppose they get it? As for "responsible decision making" this should go for all areas of a person's life, not just alcohol. Parents need to buck up and guide their children in what is right and wrong, and provide the appropriate punishments so a kid can understand that there are consequences for misguided actions.

Posted by Gerrit on 31 Mar 08 10:30 AM EDT
Maybe its time to broaden the field of inquiry on this subject. What do we know about the effects of under-21 decision-making about marriage, contracting, independent living, judgment in military (vs. civilian) judgments,etc? While we're at why not actually define "responsible decisionmaking" with regard to alcohol for a change, i.e. responsible to whom and for what?

Posted by momof2kids on 31 Mar 08 09:38 AM EDT
OK, so if the pre-fontal cortex isn't fully developed until age 25, then why is it OK to have the drinking age be 21? Do you not think that by lowering the age it will take the thrill away? Also, it's OK to get married, buy a car, go to war and make decisions on the battlefield that could change the course of history, but an 18 year old isn't mature enough to decide if they want a beer or not? Kids are in college at the age of 18, out of their parent's houses, probably working as well as taking college courses. I would think that all of this demonstrates that our country thinks 18 year olds are capable of taking on these responsibilities, but not be able to step into a bar and order a drink?

Posted by Gregg Benson, MA, LCADC on 31 Mar 08 09:01 AM EDT
Any consideration of lowereing the drinking age to 18 demonstrates the egregious level of ignorance that continues to permeate the psyche of our lawmakers and general public. The science is clear that the executive functions of our brains (pre-fontal cortex) are not fully developed until the age of 25! The logic that by lowering the drinking age to 18 to reduce by 3 years the number of underage drinkers is flawed from the outset and doesn't change the science. I have always hoped we were smarter than this and capable of actually using what we know!

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)
Enter this word
(help):		 Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for everyone, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, focused, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post personal requests for help or general promotions for your organization (Get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.