Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

U.N. Drug Official Slams Celebrity Addicts
March 10, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The head of the United Nations' anti-drug office says that celebrities who use illicit drugs are contributing to "state failure" in West Africa, CNN reported March 9.

Antonio Maria Costa, executive director of the U.N.'s Office on Drugs and Crime, wrote in an editorial that, "Coke-snorting fashionistas are not only damaging their noses and brains -- they are contributing to state failure on the other side of the world." Costa's comments followed a recent report from the International Narcotics Control Board that criticized lenient treatment for celebrity drug users for sending a bad message to youth.

West Africa has become a major transshipment point for cocaine heading from producers in South America to users in Europe.

"Amy Winehouse might adopt a defiant pose and slur her way through 'Rehab' (her Grammy Award-winning hit) but does she realize the message she sends to others who are vulnerable to addiction and who cannot afford expensive treatment?" wrote Costa. Winehouse's song deals with the singer's reluctance to enter an addiction treatment program, but she recently checked into one.

Chris Goodman, a spokesperson for Winehouse, called Costa a "ludicrous man," adding, "Amy has never given a quote about drugs or flaunted it in any way. She's had some problems and is trying to get better. The U.N. should get its own house in order."

Model and reputed cocaine user Kate Moss also was scolded by Costa."For every rebel with a cause, there are 10 others without a clue," Costa wrote. "While some well-meaning pop idols and film stars might rage against suffering in Africa, their work is being undermined by the drug habits of careless peers such as Kate Moss."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Ronald B. Brinn on 17 Mar 08 06:33 PM EDT
Blasting Amy Winehouse is a cheap attention-getting device. If you want to drive addiction down, get world leaders to seize and share the assets of drug trafficking an other rimes. Then put those billons into economic and social development. Let's get real!

Posted by Fred on 17 Mar 08 09:36 AM EDT
To Sterling and others: I would agree with your "UN Needs to gets it's own house in order" comment if you can show me what Mr. Costa actually said was wrong. These celebrities are setting very poor examples for those less fortunate than themselves. Others believe they can "control" the addiction because they see the celebs in the fancy rahab centers.

Posted by R Hanlon on 11 Mar 08 02:23 PM EDT
As a mother of five children, one of them who is a recovering addict, I find it appalling to listen to lyrics sung (slurred) by so called artists. Does the fact that they are "celebrities" negate their horrific behavior. I say NOT! In fact, since they have such a public profile I would hope they would reach higher to create a richer persona. My youngest son was going about the house singing Winehouse's Rehab song.. this was at a time when my daughter was in the greated need of rehab and was resisting... I could not help but want to reach through the radio and personally put Winehouse where she belonged. Please, don't get me wrong..my heart goes out to all addicts...their struggle, and the struggle of their entire family is tragic to say the least, but there is a responsibility that lies in many levels... such as performing artists, celebrities and most importantly the MEDIA..here is a thought, perhaps the media could report on recovery success stories and NOT report on adverse behavior of the (in)famous at all.

Posted by Derek Dollar on 11 Mar 08 11:47 AM EDT
The issue with exposing high profile media members as to their addictions and how they present themselves globally as ambassadors is real. These individuals do, in fact, receive more relaxed punishments and forgiveness in the world of drug use. Mr. Goodman is misguided in his defense of Winehouse. Minimization is a cornerstone of addicts. People working with addicts, as T. Luis presents, can make a difference in turning around lives of addicts but that is on a micro level. The macro level is what Mr. Costa is addressing. A global drug manufacturing and trafficking problem exists and drug-using mega-media moguls get in the way of what attempts are being addressed to extinguish the problem.

Posted by Eric Sterling on 11 Mar 08 11:41 AM EDT
I am willing to grant that the UNODC probably does some good work. However, these comments are not the evidence. People with substance abuse problems generally feel pretty bad. How does this criticism help them? Who, besides Mr. Costa, believes that such public shaming will deter what is usually covert behavior by those inclined toward it? One can concede that consuming prohibited drugs contributes to the problems of prohibition economies such as violence and corruption. But in standing in judgment about such consumers, we ought to ask if we should judge those who consume chocolate, coffee, oil, clothing, technology, etc. all of which are produced with horrendous exploitation of producers or at grave environmental cost. There is no moral difference, merely an aesthetic one. We all feel entitled to our necessities -- even if others judge them as only luxuries, frivolities or vices.

Posted by Thomas Luis on 11 Mar 08 10:08 AM EDT
I agree with Sterling. It's too easy to stand in front of a podium and blame everyone. What are you doing to fix the problem? I work with addicts and I make a difference every single day.

Posted by Sterling Cannon on 11 Mar 08 09:57 AM EDT
I agree with Chris, "the U.N. should get it's own house in order". Pointing the finger and placing blame will not help the cause of chemical dependency. Shame on you Antonio Maria Costa.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.