Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Some Dying Medical-Marijuana Users Can't Get Transplants
April 28, 2008

Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Medical-marijuana is legal in some states, but a number of organ-donation programs bar users from getting transplants even though marijuana does not have direct negative effects on most organs, the Associated Press reported April 27.

Medical-marijuana patient Timothy Garon, 56, has hepatitis C but was recently refused a spot on the liver transplant list at the University of Washington Medical Center because he uses the drug. Transplant programs often bar patients with a history of alcohol or other drug use from getting a replacement organ.

"Marijuana, unlike alcohol, has no direct effect on the liver. It is however a concern ...  in that it's a potential indicator of an addictive personality," said Robert Sade, director of the Institute of Human Values in Health Care at the Medical University of South Carolina.

Transplant policies are left to individual hospitals, and some automatically reject anyone who uses illicit substances; others, like the UCLA Medical Center, allow patients to join their transplant list if they have been clean and sober for six months. Some insurers also require proof of abstinence before they will pay for a transplant.

Some experts have called for national eligibility standards that could take into account medical-marijuana laws.

Post-transplant, doctors generally agree that smoking marijuana should be prohibited, since the drugs patients take to prevent organ rejection increase the risk of a potentially deadly infection that can be triggered by mold in marijuana and tobacco.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by fordpurdy on 05 May 08 12:19 PM EDT
There is one transplant organ available and many people needing that organ. Who would you rather see have it? Someone who uses/abuses substances (legal or not) and may abuse his new organ or someone who is having their life taken from them through no fault of their own? You cannot split hairs between the legitimate users of an illegal substance or those that abuse it. If life isn't worth six months sobriety to a dying person, than I'd be seriously concerned about giving a precious and rare organ to them. Despite what your personal opinion is, marijuana is illegal and causes serious problems for many users, just like alcohol. Some can use it responsibly and others cannot. So, if you chose to use an illegal substance, despite whether you believe it should be legalized, then you must deal with the consequences of that choice.

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 30 Apr 08 07:30 AM EDT
Just because the U.S. government has deemed cannabis as bad as Heroin and made it a Schedule I drug does not make it right. All well informed people know why cannabis was made illegal in the first place and why it is still illegal, so I won't go into all that again. I think if this is the way it's going to be that all cannabis consumers should refuse to donate organs when they slip on through to the other side. I wonder if Red Cross is going to refuse my blood for similar reasons soon.

Posted by Shelley on 29 Apr 08 07:00 PM EDT
To "John from Oceanside". I've read the full article, and this guy is not choosing to smoke pot instead of getting a transplant. In the past, he was prescribed medical marijuana by his doctor, to help with nausea, and stimulate his appetite. THAT is the reason he cannot get a transplant. I believe that is so wrong!

Posted by jlm on 29 Apr 08 04:01 PM EDT
In this case the focus is on marijuana, however it really seems to be about a limited supply. Rather than worrying about criteria to exclude, let's find ways to expand the availablity of organs.

Posted by Frank Winkler on 29 Apr 08 10:41 AM EDT
FWIW, marijuana was not outlawed for its rope-making potential, but as an illegal substance of abuse in the 1930s following a demonizing campaign by the Hearst enterprize along with the fledgling BNDD (or its since-forgotten predecessor)that specifically targeted and exploited stereotyped fears of Blacks and Hispanics. Regardless of one's views on pot as medicine and/or legalization, it is in my opinion highly prejudicial and narrow-minded for the medical community (first do no harm) to use such a biased position to deny a transplant to a patient in need. Shameful.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 29 Apr 08 10:38 AM EDT
Mr. Garon would rather smoke weed and die than get clean for six month. Medical Marijuana Advocates are the ones killing people, not the government or doctors, or give me a break the cotton industry. What get's me is you guys have anyone buy your rantings. You did win for awhile, but with all the carnage marijuana creates you have been losing lately. DS look into some help from a mental health specialist.

Posted by ds on 29 Apr 08 09:45 AM EDT
When this country was founded hemp was its major cash crop. It was used in clothing, paper, rope, and it was not associated with its close cousin, canibus. In the tradition of the capitalistic spirit, early Americans found cotton to be much more profitable. Very much like what goes on today the government acted on the behalf of private interest and outlawed hemp and its close cousin marijuana. Does this have anything to do with how marijuana is viewed today? Is this a conspiracy theory against cotton manufacturers? Even if the history is incorrect, why is marijuana demonized while oxycotton is FDA approved? Why don't doctors stand up for patients like Mr. Garon, when the scientific facts are clearly in favor of him receiving a transplant? Is it unprofessional to go against convention even if it means losing human life?

Your Turn! Post a public comment (guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES:
Comments are meant for thoughtful public discussion of the article published above. Therefore:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, focused, and on-topic.

  2. Do not post personal requests for help (see resources).

  3. Proof your comments carefully for spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

  4. Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated comments are prohibited.

We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.