Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Senators Call Extending Bar Hours for Inauguration a Bad Idea
December 11, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

U.S. Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif) and Robert Bennett (R-Utah) say they are "deeply concerned" about emergency legislation passed by Washington, D.C., city council to extend bar and nightclub hours during the week of Barack Obama's inauguration next month, the Washington Post reported Dec. 10.

Feinstein, who is chairing the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies, and Bennett, a committee member, oppose the council's decision to allow bars to serve alcohol until 5 a.m. and remain open 24 hours a day from January 17-21.

"The plan … could seriously strain law-enforcement resources that need to be focused on the large crowds and security requirements of the Inaugural," the senators wrote in a letter to city officials. "There is great cause for celebration at this historic event. But we believe that the benefits of this emergency legislation, passed with little public notice, are far outweighed by its possible consequences."

Backers of the legislation, proposed by the Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington, disagreed. "The prediction of dire consequences is a little over the top," said city council member Mary Cheh, who pointed out that the city of Minneapolis extended alcohol-service hours by two extra hours during the Republican National Convention.

"We're the site of lots of demonstrations, celebrations," Cheh said. "We know how to do this. I respect [the senators'] view, but we should be the best judge of what happens locally."

The city expects between one and four million people to travel to the capital for the inauguration, accompanied by as many as 4,000 police officers from around the country to help handle security.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by lisaf-breakingthecycles on 11 Dec 08 02:27 PM EST
Extending alcohol-service hours by two extra hours is not the same as extending them to 24/7 or until 5 a.m. I fully support U.S. Sens. Feinstein and Benentt's concern. It's highly unlikely that someone will start with their first drink at 4:00 a.m., and the body of research shows binge drinking (5 or more for men and 4 or more for women) seriously impairs a person's ability to think straight and make wise decisions.

Posted by rachelrachel on 11 Dec 08 07:23 PM EST
"Emergency" legislation? What's the emergency?

Posted by Nicole on 12 Dec 08 02:33 PM EST
I feel this is an extremely awful example to set for the young children and young adults of America. ESPECIALLY, during such a historical event. Is it really acceptable to condone an “all nighters?” “Emergency Legislation” Wow, if this is tolerated, I suspect there will be numerous emergencies in Washington during the week of January 17-21. Bad things tend to happen when people are drinking all night long.

Posted by Lauren Tyson on 13 Dec 08 08:03 AM EST
Since the city already passed the legislation, bars and nightclubs need to be more proactive than usual about protecting their liquor license and their guests. Employees should be trained in responsible serving practices, and establishments should have written alcohol policies in place as a foundation. This will help them prevent serving minors and reduce intoxication--two things that create the greatest risk for liability.

Posted by Jodi on 15 Dec 08 08:18 AM EST
Absurd, disappointing and fraught with potential for disaster. What's up with this?

Posted by the wrong issue on 15 Dec 08 01:47 PM EST
i think this deals with the wrong issue. do we really have laws saying how long a private business can stay open. have we traveled far enough down the path to fascism that senators think they have a right to dictate when clubs should close. this is outrageous. why not just set a curfew for the city, or just outlaw drinking entirely. it's only a few more steps down that road.

Posted by Burnette Scarboro on 17 Dec 08 01:59 PM EST
Is all this partying truly necessary for such a historical event? Why is this "emergency" legislation a matter of concern for this inauguration? Think about the message that you're subconsiously or consciously projecting to the world!

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines