Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

S.C. State Workers Will Pay Higher Premium for Smoking
August 19, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

South Carolina in 2010 will join seven other states whose government workers pay more for their state health insurance if they or their spouse uses tobacco, the Associated Press reported Aug. 14.

State budget leaders this month voted 3-2 in favor of imposing a $25 monthly surcharge on the premiums of state workers who smoke or use chewing tobacco. The proposal was the idea of Gov. Mark Sanford, but he actually voted against the approved measure because he did not see why the increase couldn't be imposed before the planned start date of Jan. 1, 2010.

The state budget board has reported that tobacco-related illnesses are responsible for 7 percent of the $1.1 billion spent for public employees' health care.

State workers will have to self-identify as nonsmokers in order not to be imposed the extra charge. The state has not decided how it will guard against employees' lying on their insurance forms. In Alabama, individuals who are caught lying — often because a co-worker tells supervisors about it — owe all back surcharges from the time they inaccurately completed their forms.

The governor said he is skeptical as to whether the surcharge will convince many employees or family members to stop smoking in the tobacco-friendly state, which has the nation's lowest cigarette tax at 7 cents a pack. Along with the disincentive to smoke, Sanford would like to include positive incentives in the state health insurance program for healthy behaviors such as exercise and proper nutrition. 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by sandy on 20 Aug 08 06:57 PM EDT
I can already hear people complain as they're targeted unfairly. We all know that folks who smoke are at risk for a higher number of personal health problems. If you want to smoke then you need to partake of the associated costs related to health benefits. Why should non-smokers be forced to pay part of the costs to folks who choose to smoke.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines