Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Report Sees Shift in Obama Stance on Marijuana Policy
February 4, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Barack Obama stated support for marijuana decriminalization in 2004 but has backed off that position during the 2008 presidential campaign, the Washington Times reported Feb. 1.

While running for Senate in 2004, Obama told a group of Northwestern University students, "I think we need to rethink and decriminalize our marijuana laws. But I'm not somebody who believes in legalization of marijuana."

However, Obama joined other Democratic candidates during an Oct. 30 debate is indicating that he opposed marijuana decriminalization.

An Obama spokesperson, Tommy Vietor, first told the newspaper that the candidate had "always" supported decriminalization, but later said campaign officials later said that Obama does not support eliminating criminal penalties for marijuana possession and use.

"If you're convicted of a crime, you should be punished, but that we are sending far too many first-time, nonviolent drug users to prison for very long periods of time, and that we should rethink those laws," Vietor said, blaming the confusion in defining Obama's position on an unclear definition of decriminalization.

Obama's political rival, Sen. Hillary Clinton, does not support marijuana decriminalization, and among the Republicans only Rep. Ron Paul wants to ease the nation's drug laws.

"This is mostly evolutionary thinking," said John Jackson of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University. "It's not a clear 'flip-flop' kind of change, but inevitably, when someone is running for a different position, four years later, there is likely to be some change or some emphasis that gets placed differently."

 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by ed kelly on 22 Sep 08 10:27 PM EDT
pot is no worse than beer its the only things that make my friends with cancer able to eat and not feel sick thats a good enought reason if there no going to find a cure

Posted by Randy on 11 Nov 08 11:14 PM EST
Putting someone who sells a HARMLESS substance (with so many medical benefits)in prison next to child rapists, murderers and other violent criminals is criminal in and of itself.

Posted by citizen on 17 Nov 08 07:54 PM EST
Ever looked at the DEA drug schedule? Take a look. All psychedelics can be found on schedule 1(most dangerous and addictive without medicinal potential). And yes marijuana is a mild hallucinogen with pschedelic properties. But psychedelics arent addictive, most have no toxicity level and all have unlimited medical potential for numerous diseases particularly nuerological disorders. These drugs are strictly controlled because they are dangerous to the status qou not to the individual. They cause individual thinking rather than the flawed hive mind personality that is so often subject to "group think" irrational behaviors. It's not a war on drugs, its a war on personal freedom, try to keep that in mind.

Posted by Travis on 25 Nov 08 12:28 PM EST
If you look at the death rate of all drugs in the U.S. marijuana is not even on that chart. At the TOP of the chart you will find our legal "drugs" alcohol and tobacco to be the leading death rate in America. There are no reports of any victims over dosing or any other life threatening reports due to marijuanna.

Posted by timbo slice on 31 Dec 08 11:12 PM EST
obviously, whoever says that marijuana is a hallucinogen has never used the stuff. u want to hallucinate? then go to ur local smoke shop and ask for something called salvia. it is ligal and, from experience, can make you hallucinate about 20 times more intense than ur average magic mushroom. lets face it...marijuana is not the serious drug that the government has led everyone to believe. it is a natural medical herb. anyone who has used it will agree that it is way less harmfull than tobacco or alcohol.

Posted by Substance Abuse on 06 Mar 09 02:23 PM EST
It is not ture that MJ is not harmful, ask my sister in law who developed the diease of addiction to MJ and lost her children to CWPS and who started using other harder drugs. She has been affected emotioinally spiritually amotionanlly, physically and phycologically and socially. MJ has a high potential for somone ot use, misuse and become chemically dependant. it alters perception and I have tried and enjoyed it, but think of those who that do not just use it, but those who misuse and then develop addiction. DViolence, child abuse, and crime are all linked to MJ use. The probel lies in that one can never know who will or will not develop an addiction.

Posted by Matatan on 17 Apr 09 11:59 AM EDT
with regards to substance abuse at the bottom, believe me i can empathize with you for youre hard ships, however MJ is not a gate way drug at all, in reality there is no such thing as a gateway drug..It is called self control and self obideience.... MJ is so benifical compared to stogs and alcohol, and other drugs where as having a stronger affect have negative effects as well.... MJ is not addicting...Weak people get addicted....Its the same thing as saying a gun killed someone.. the gun didnt do anything the person who pulled the trigger did

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines