Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Psychiatrists Received Biggest Chunk of Pharmaceutical Company Payoffs, Vermont Study Finds
July 18, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

With abuse of prescription drugs a growing problem, Vermont is one of a handful of states that require pharmaceutical companies to report how much cash and gifts they give to doctors.

The latest figures show that psychiatrists are the biggest recipients of industry largesse in Vermont, the Burlington Free Press reported July 10.

The disclosure report filed with the state attorney general's office showed that pharmaceutical firms spent $3.1 million in Vermont over a 12-month period -- up $1 million in two years -- to promote their products to doctors. Psychiatrists were the single biggest recipients, with 11 mental-health experts receiving a total of $626,379. The report did not include the value of free samples, scholarships, drug rebates and discounts, and gifts valued at less than $25 each given to doctors.

"It is unacceptable to have these kinds of numbers continue," said Ken Libertoff, executive director of the Vermont Association for Mental Health. "It is unnecessary and unwise, and it raises the profoundly disturbing question of whether health care is patient-centered or market-centered."

Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell agreed. "This report shows, once again, that the pharmaceutical industry has too much influence over the practice of medicine in Vermont."

However, Judy Moore, a spokesperson for Eli Lilly and Co., said that, "Physician compensation is a legitimate expense for the fair market value of consultation, teaching and sharing relevant information about the benefit and risks of our products."

Ken Johnson, a spokesperson for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, also defended the payments and criticized Vermont's disclosure law, which he said inhibited "access to critical scientific information about the benefits and risks of treatment options."

The report found that drug companies spent the most money promoting drugs for attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 20 Jul 08 07:53 AM EDT
PHARMACIES are nothing more than LEGAL POISON PUSHERS (in my opinion) KEN LIBERTOFF is a wise man and the answer is MARKET DRIVEN....

Posted by Michael Ellner on 21 Jul 08 08:45 AM EDT
Let us get real! One needn't be a doctor, researcher or a rocket scientist to realize that conventional medical practice and health care is profit driven Kudos to Vemont for taking on this serious threat to public health...

Posted by Robin on 21 Jul 08 03:50 PM EDT
Why are we surprised at the drug abuse stats in this country? We desperately want to fix ALL problems with drugs. Legal and illegal dealers drive a HUGE part of our economy. Who REALLY thinks that medicine is about health???? A few doctors who are willing to tell us what we don't want to hear ... eat right, excercise your mind and body, and do good work. Not "here's your prescriptions".

Posted by John French on 21 Jul 08 09:00 PM EDT
Psychiatric diagnosis and prescribing are both notoriously unreliable, so Big Pharma has more wiggle room to convince the physician that (a) a diagnosis exists, and (b) the specific medicine is the best.

Posted by Anonymous on 23 Jul 08 08:55 AM EDT
I find this very helpful information. What continuing education do you have available?

Posted by iconoclast hero on 23 Jul 08 03:09 PM EDT
For "continuing education" please see _Our_Daily_Meds_ by Melody Petersen (New York Times Columnist). It is not a book from the lunatic fringe but rather a well footnoted expose in the muckraking style of Upton Sinclair.

Posted by Dan Wilemon on 10 Sep 08 11:32 AM EDT
The article does not describe what kind of gifts are given; most payouts I'm aware of are stipends for speaking at free lunches and other meals for various professionals in the field. Free samples of very expensive medication are always welcome for use with many patients who can't afford it.

Posted by BruceRTalbot on 08 Oct 08 11:56 AM EDT
Sounds like a classic "Pay to Play" scheme. Federal legislation is needed to bring the light of day to this murky practice of offering incentives to doctors in an attempt to sway drug prescriptions.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines