Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Officials Scramble to Comply with Mass. Marijuana Decriminalization
December 19, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Massachusetts residents voted overwhelmingly in November to decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana, leaving state officials to figure out how to set up a new system of civil penalties for formerly criminal offenses, the New York Times reported Dec. 18.

With the new law scheduled to go into effect on Jan. 2, officials are trying to answer such basic questions as who will collect the $100 fines for possession called for in the ballot initiative, and which part of government will be responsible for ensuring that violators under age 18 attend required drug-education classes -- and pay fines of up to $1,000 if they don't.

Enforcement also will be complicated by the fact that Massachusetts law bars police from demanding identification from offenders charged with a civil infraction, and that officers will have to prove that the substance in question is actually marijuana.

Wayne Sampson, executive director of the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association, said that if these issues aren't resolved then the state could end up with de-facto marijuana legalization, which he asserted is what backers of the measure wanted all along.

However, Dan Bernath, a spokesperson for the Marijuana Policy Project, said, "I can't help but think that the real difficulty in implementing it is they don't want to do it." Eleven other states have decriminalized marijuana possession, and although most other states consider possession a misdemeanor, not a civil infraction, there's plenty of past experience for Massachusetts policymakers to draw upon.

"I think the resistance has to do with dealing with something new," Bernath said. "We're pretty confident that once this gets going and the newness of it wears off, a lot of the apprehension will go away."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by maxwood on 22 Dec 08 12:39 PM EST
Perhaps it will be remembered as ironic that JT carried this report of frantic efforts to retain some kind of penalty for marijuana possession on the same day as two reports of concern over binge drinking, in France and Oregon. Everyone is afraid to face up to the argument that legalizing cannabis might put an end to binge drinking as we have known it over the centuries. Not only the alcohol industry, with its financial power, and the governments addicted to collecting taxes from it, but especially the tobacco industry, with its much bigger tax contribution and its much bigger share of wrongful deaths, is behind the "hard line" against cannabis. Survival of the tobacco colossus as we have known it depends on enduring the damage of alcohol, cocaine, heroine, meth etc. as the price of keeping cannabis illegal and expensive.

Posted by Jon Gettel on 22 Dec 08 01:30 PM EST
I hope this is the beginning of the end of the war on marijuana. Stop the war on this safe and effective medicine. Marijuana can reduce the use of alcohol, herion and cocaine. We can reduce drug abuse by legalizing marijuana. Keep up the good work and keep fighting the prohibitionists!

Posted by John from Oceanside on 22 Dec 08 04:06 PM EST
I know California has had a simular law for 30 years the difference is that it wasn't written by a legalizing organization like Marijuana Policy Project or Drug Policy Alliance.

Posted by William Green on 22 Dec 08 04:25 PM EST
Don't use California as an example. Set stringent guidelines to follow and don't make it a free for all. We have seen more DUI marijuana collisions than ever. Good Luck Michigan.

Posted by William Green on 22 Dec 08 04:34 PM EST
California has only had its law in place for 12 years.

Posted by william Green on 22 Dec 08 04:37 PM EST
Good Luck Massachusetts, sorry not Michigan.

Posted by Dwayne Polidori on 18 Feb 09 08:44 AM EST
I havent heard of any DUI marijuana collisions anywhere!!

Posted by Mark Jordon on 26 Feb 09 10:28 AM EST
Dont the police have real criminals to apprehend? Or do they want to seize property and spend their resources chasing non-violent offenders? I believe that sometimes they avoid violent criminals due to the fear factor and increased difficulty and risk of arresting them. Pot smokers and casual drug users are much easier targets

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines