Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Need Forced Fla. City to End Ban on Hiring Smokers
May 21, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

A Florida city that was one of the first municipalities to prohibit hiring of smokers dropped its ban five years ago because it was hampering the city's ability to hire police officers, the Sarasota Herald Tribune reported May 21.

Officials in North Miami also said that the health-insurance savings anticipated from the ban also dried up. "It was really hampering our recruitment process and it no longer made a difference on our insurance," said Pam Solomon, a city spokesperson. "Our insurance company said obesity was a bigger issue than smoking."

The North Miami policy was upheld by the Florida Supreme Court in 1995 and since has become a model for other municipalities, including Sarasota County, which recently announced a hiring ban on smokers.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Dave on 23 May 08 09:09 AM EDT
This issue illustrates how screwed up our health care system is. While obesity could be argued to affect cop job performance, its difficult to see how smoking would impair the ability of police to perform their duties. Job performance should be the only criterion for hiring. But because for some strange reason health care in the U.S. has been coupled to employment, we have employers making health care decisions about their employees. I for one do not feel good about this even though I recognize that smoking imperils health and raises insurance rates. Perhaps the compromise that some employers have made of asking smokers in their business to pay more than non-smokers for health insurance benefits is a better way of dealing with this issue. Simply excluding smokers from employment seems somewhat irrational even though the Florida Supreme Court found it constitutional.

Posted by John French on 22 May 08 12:21 PM EDT
There are two separate issues. First is the added health care costs for smokers, and second is smoking on the job. It is easy to separate them in practice.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.