Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

McCain's Close Alcohol Ties Worry Advocates
March 10, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has close ties with the alcohol industry, including a wife whose serves as chair of her family's Anheuser-Busch distributorship and a son who serves as the company's chief financial officer.

McCain himself also once worked as the head publicist for the Arizona-based distributor, Hensley & Co., the Boston Globe reported March 9.

McCain has routinely recused himself from votes in Congress related to alcohol issues, but would not have that option as president. Some advocates also worry that federal regulators will be less than vigorous in policing the alcohol industry given McCain's industry ties. "It would not be helpful to have a president from Anheuser-Busch," said George Hacker, director of the alcohol policies project at the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

The family business has helped enrich John and Cindy McCain, who have a reported $44 million in net assets, making the Arizona Republican the ninth-richest member of Congress. McCain has received $152,725 in campaign contributions from the alcohol industry, although that still trails the $210,750 accepted by Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton, who also is running for president. Anheuser-Busch alone donated $15,200 to McCain.

By contrast with his lack of involvement with alcohol issues, McCain has been very active on smoking prevention, including legislation to crack down on the industry and underage use of tobacco.

In his autobiography, McCain details heavy drinking in his youth as well as the drinking problems of his father, the late Admiral John S. McCain Jr. "My father returned from the war with a great appetite for drink, which he overindulged until the very last years of his life . . . drinking changed his personality in unattractive ways," wrote McCain. "When he was drunk, I did not recognize him."

If elected president, McCain could face votes on the alcohol industry's attempt to cut the federal beer tax in half, reducing the legal drinking age from 21 to 18, and giving states more latitude on drunk-driving laws. McCain has recently stated that he supported the age-21 law.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Patti on 10 Mar 08 10:00 PM EDT
I'm neither for nor against McCain but it has always seemed to me that Republicans "dirt" surfaces more and faster and more publicly than Democratic "dirt". I have watched this every election year and it has never changed. Has anyone looked "closely" into the Clintons? Isn't it odd that so many that opposed them have gone to jail, gone broke, or died? Let's level out the playing field, media. It's time for a fair and just election.

Posted by Virginia on 11 Mar 08 07:11 AM EDT
I am not sure who I will vote for either but I am sure the author of this aritcle is trying to conveniece me to vote democrate. I was interested in finding facts about McCain's views on alcohol policy. The facts I found in this article are 1)the alcohlo industry has donated more to the Clintoan Campain than to the McCain Campain 2) McCain has first hand experience of how alcoholism affects a family 3) McCain has family members that work for beer distributers 4) McCain says he supports the drinking age at 21 and 5) McCain drank alcohol when he was a teenager. On the contrary to the author's argument that this means McCain may support weaker regualations on the alcohol industry, I think McCain has a great deal of experience on both sides of the issue and will probably make well informed decisions; however, I also believe he needs to be asked his viewpoints before they are assummed and published.

Posted by Willis Cain on 11 Mar 08 09:02 AM EDT
I am not surprised at this. Even in our state of Michigan, if they want to raise taxes they always go after the tobacco users and never the alcohol users and we in the treatment business know that alcohol is the number one social ill.

Posted by Vicki on 11 Mar 08 09:27 AM EDT
I wasn't aware of John McCain's connections with the alcohol industry and it's important background information. I agree questions about his opinions and positions on this issue need to be asked as part of the campaign. I don't consider this information "dirt" and I thought I'd heard all I ever wanted to know about the Clintons. It's always interesting to heart other people's perspective.

Posted by Arnie Magy on 11 Mar 08 01:23 PM EDT
With a little integrity, this relationship could be beneficial...But we're talking about politics, aren't we. This is a serious issue. And seemingly a conflict with the public interest.

Posted by Johnnie Parrish on 11 Mar 08 05:43 PM EDT
I would like to comment on all three of current candidates for President of the United States: McCain, Obama and Clinton. I myself have been an elected public official and I like each of these three individual candidates took an oath of office. In this oath, we each swore before God and man that we would "UPHOLD AND PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, IT'S LAWS, AND THE LAWS OF OUR STATE." If these three individuals had upheld the constitution as well as the present laws, we, the citizens of these United States would not be faced with the problems that now exist: ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, ECONOMY, POLUTION, JOB SECURITY, AND THE MASS PUBLIC DEBT. Each of these individuals have been in office for a period of some years, and during that time had they lived up to their oath of office; Many of the CAMPAIGN PROMISES they are now making could have already been happening during their tenure of office as United States Senator. I personally have e-mailed each of them and asked IF THEY HAVE UPHELD THE PROMISE THEY MADE TO THEIR CONSTITUANTS DURING THEIR ELECTION and as of this date not one single person has answered my questions pertaining to these matters of public interest. This country was established on religious principles and all three of these candidates have made positive efforts to destroy the American dream by building up their own interest. NO ONE CAN TRUTHFULLY DENY THIS CHARGE. I hope and pray that the American People will wake up before it is too late. God is still in control, and many of present elected officials are now trying to take God completely out of the picture. There is a GREAT DAY COMING. We all must be prepared for that day of reckoning. Much love for God and our country, and may He continue to forgive our shortcomings, and bless our United States of America; only IF we change our present hate for our Creator. Sincerely, Johnnie Parrish

Posted by DAVID on 11 Mar 08 06:58 PM EDT
If any illness needs the support of all of our elected officials, it is the disease of addiction. I do not think it matters what the addiction is. If the number lives that are lost where caused by anything else, as a people we would demand to have a national focus on seeking solutions.

Posted by Lew on 12 Mar 08 10:09 AM EDT
Is anyone who has ever worked in the alcohol industry, or who has family who work in the alcohol industry, to be banned from public office? This is a very disturbing trend in the treatment and prevention community: do not have any engagement with the alcohol industry, demonize anyone in it and anyone with any contact to it. As Virginia says below, this could be a chance to work with someone who truly understands both sides of the story. Alcohol is not purely evil; moderate drinking is not a danger. To act on the notion that any drinking is unacceptable is to court the kind of extremism and fanaticism that led to the disaster of national Prohibition. I work with the alcohol industry every day -- I'm a freelance drinks writer -- but I'm also a father, and have friends who struggle with addiction. That's why I'm here: to try to find ways to bridge the gap in understanding. Right now, almost everyone in the alcohol industry has been utterly alienated by fanaticism in the addiction community, to the point where they are suspicious of them, don't trust them, and tend to deny the problem. This polarization helps no one. I'm sad to see it, and sad to see the tone of this article.

Posted by Michael Levy on 12 Mar 08 11:09 AM EDT
The Republican candidate has far many more negatives than his association with the liquor industry. His association with and advocacy of many of this president and his Nero-like policies, along with McCain's own idiotic ideas about spending and indefinate number of decades in Iraq assures that none of us need worry about anything his past may hold. He has absolutely no chance of being seen in the Oval Office, unless of course, he visits President Obama there.

Posted by Robin on 12 Mar 08 08:01 PM EDT
I agree that demonizing any industry does not help solve the problems connected with that industry. I respect McCain's integrity and think he can ethically manage any relationship with the alcohol industry, but I am worried about his views of addiction and treatment. His wife had a serious problem with opiates. Has that magically disappeared? I have heard that he does not think much of methadone treatment. Is he uninformed or intentionally ignorant? I do not want a president making medical decisions for millions contrary to good science.

Posted by Gerrit DenHartog on 12 Mar 08 10:59 PM EDT
Three very relevant questions for Lew: (1) Who are the alcohol industry's best customers? (2) What would happen to the industry if it lost a substantial proportion of its best customers? (3)Why does the industry steadfastly refuse to DEFINE "responsible drinking" or "responsible consumption" in its promotions? The answers to these three questions will go a long way toward bridging the "gap in understanding" he asserts. If he suggests that "moderate drinkers" are the industry's best customers, then I think he will want to buy the proverbial bridge I's like to sell him.

Posted by marty on 13 Mar 08 02:04 PM EDT
I don't think it is appropriate to assign God to any state or federal business, Johnnie. Our writers of the Declaration of Independence used the word creator because most of them were agnostic, athiest, or truly thinking logically enough to know they need to be seperate. All of America is not religious and it upsets me to see people comment this way. Marty

Posted by ALLEN on 17 Mar 08 10:49 AM EDT
OK, Im not voting for him, but obviously he realizes the woes of alcohol... Im alcoholic, I could not work for AB but Im sure many can!!!!!!

Posted by Danny on 17 Mar 08 04:11 PM EDT
I, too, am opposed to intolerance of any kind, especially drinking, if for no other reason than "such an attitude is not helpful to anyone." (Alcoholics Anonymous, page 103). Besides, one could argue that President Bush is very different from Senator McCain on alcohol, and that has not been too helpful either.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines