Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Mass. Police Officials Urge Rejection of Marijuana Decriminalization
November 3, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

On the eve of Election Day, Massachusetts police and law-enforcement groups say that voters should reject a ballot item that would decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana, the Boston Globe reported Oct. 31.

"Drug use, drug abuse, and drug sales are synonymous with other types of criminal activity," said Boston Police Commissioner Edward F. Davis. "Where you find drug dealers, you also find guns and violence." Davis said decriminalizing marijuana "gives those dealers a loophole to enterprise while punishing the neighborhoods where they're going to do business."

Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, Berkshire District Attorney David Capeless, and Cape and Islands District Attorney Michael O'Keefe, and state Attorney General Martha Coakley all have stated their opposition to Question 2, which would decriminalize possession of up to an ounce of marijuana and cap punishment for offenders at a $100 fine.

"Question 2 is really the 'drug dealer's protection act,'" Conley said.

The measure would not change current penalties for selling marijuana, however. The Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy said that three-quarters of those arrested for marijuana possession are under age 24 and currently face the prospect of a permanent criminal record if convicted of minor possession.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Aaron M on 05 Nov 08 09:08 AM EST
First of all just because some one owns a gun and smokes or sells Marijuana doesn't make them dangerous no more than a armed store clerk trying to protect them self. And second a gun is useless if it's not loaded what are you going to say to some one trying to rob you "hold on let me load my gun so i can protect myself and my property before you rob me" seeriously get real people.

Posted by msjordon@gmail.com on 04 Nov 08 09:29 AM EST
I fail to see how Question 2 is protecting drug dealers when it does not change the penalty for dealing drugs. Certainly, it is not legalizing heroin and illicit possession of oxycontin. Marijuana is a relatively innocuous drug and should not be lumped with the opiates and amphetamines. The law enforcement industry has a vested interest in perpetuating the current laws as they are able to use them to seize property. Some law enforcement agencies have informally decriminalized marijuana by just ignoring small possession cases, sometimes the police just let them go with a warning. They realize that there are far more important drug issues to deal with. I can assure you there are many marijuana users in private gated communities, they are lawyers, doctors and university professors. the judicial system is far too busy with violent crime , hard drug cases, etc.

Posted by Aubrey@stonehill on 04 Nov 08 08:57 AM EST
I agree, Question 2 is protecting nobody else but the drug dealers. Its giving them a free forum to sell there drugs and become more successful doing so, while our neighborhoods are suffering. It is basically a slap on the hand, and nothing will be learnt from this $100 fine. I think that with all drugs, including marijuana, there is violence involved. Decriminalizing it will cover up all the violence that goes along with it. I live in a private gated community, and just recently there was a drug bust, and not only was heroin, marjiuana, and oxycontins found, but also loaded guns. I had no idea that I was living right next door to this, but it certainly scares me. Especially since the offender is out and about like nothing ever happened. Where is the judicial system???

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.