Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

MADD Labels Amethyst Initiative a Threat
September 16, 2008

Share Share Email
email
Print
print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Representatives of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) are labeling the recent national campaign to reopen debate on lowering the legal drinking age from 21 to 18 a threat to public health and safety, the Dallas Morning News reported Sept. 6.

A panel discussion titled "Why 21?" conducted at MADD's annual conference in Dallas, focused on the Amethyst Initiative, launched in July and signed by 130 university presidents.

The initiative arose as a result of college administrators' inability to control the problem of on-campus binge drinking, said Chuck Hurley, MADD's chief executive officer, adding that the initiative "has become an embarrassment to the presidents who signed it."

One of the signers of the initiative, Louis J. Agnese Jr., president of the University of the Incarnate Word, argued that the issue revolves around fairness. "An 18-year-old is allowed to vote, get married, enlist in the military and enroll in college because society accepts her or his ability to make decisions as an adult," he said, adding that society should be consistent when it comes to granting the right to drink alcohol.

MADD president Laura Dean-Mooney disagreed, saying the issue isn't about individual rights. "It's about public health and safety," she said.

Hurley encouraged researchers to present to the public results of any studies related to the issue, citing the need for independent scientific data to counter any bias against MADD-related findings.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by westy42 on 17 Sep 08 08:50 AM EDT
The same "fairness" argument was used to lower the drinking age during the 1960's, when boys were being drafted but couldn't buy a beer. So let's revisit the issue - when they reinstate the draft!

Posted by Bert Lynn on 17 Sep 08 09:39 AM EDT
They should raise the drinking age to 25 like they have with cig.

Posted by Jason Blanchette on 17 Sep 08 10:34 AM EDT
Some of us choose to serve our country because there are dictators and terrorist leaders who will stop at nothing to gain more power. It disgusts me that so many people who never chose to serve use the military as an excuse for lowering the drinking age. Those who have served found that there were a lot of other things they couldn't do without the permission of their chain of command besides drinking. If 18 year olds are too irresponsible to drink and if that irresponsibility effects the well-being of our nation, and especially if that irresponsibility deteriorates the efficiency of the United States Military, then 18 year olds should not be allowed to drink.

Posted by Jason Blanchette on 17 Sep 08 10:44 AM EDT
The federal government allows the military leaders to choose alcohol age limits for their foreign bases. Despite this freedom to choose age limits, all 4 branches choose to have a minimum age limit of 21 on all foreign bases (with the exception of Marines stationed in Japan where the age limit is 20). I cannot think of an organization that would know more about turning adolescents into responsible adults than the United States Military.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Submissions are held for review and approval.
Please read the guidelines before posting.

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments