Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

House Committee Approves FDA Tobacco Bill
April 3, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

In a major victory for stop-smoking advocates, the House Energy and Commerce Committee cleared a bill giving the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority to regulate tobacco products, the New York Times reported April 2.

The committee voted 38-12 to approve the legislation, which now heads to the floor of the House for a vote. Companion legislation was passed by a Senate committee last July but is still awaiting a floor vote.

The Bush administration and some lawmakers, notably Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), have opposed the legislation. "The administration believes that tobacco is not a device or a drug to be regulated by the FDA," said White House spokeswoman Emily Lawrimore. Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) has threatened to filibuster the bill.

Bill sponsor Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) said that claims about the FDA being too overwhelmed to tackle tobacco regulation are "clearly red herrings from those who are fundamentally opposed to regulating tobacco at all."

The legislation hardly gives FDA free regulatory reign: the agency would be prohibited from banning nicotine, for example, or from raising the legal purchase age for tobacco from 18 to 21. Sales of menthol-flavored cigarettes also would continue despite a ban on candy-flavored cigarettes.

"In a perfect world, we'd ban all cigarettes," said Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.). "But the hard fact of the matter is that there are a lot of jobs depending on this. And more importantly, there are a lot of people out there who are addicted to this and they've got to have their fix."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Bonnie Hewett, MSN, RN on 08 Apr 08 08:57 AM EDT
If tobacco was regulated by the FDA, maybe they could stop unethical tobacco company practices such as adding more and more nicotine to cigarettes to keep people as addicted as possible. Nicotine is the only legal drug (unless you consider alcohol a drug) that, when used as directed, DIRECTLY CAUSES chronic disease and death. There is no practical use for this drug in treating any ailment. We should not continue to allow people to become addicted to a deadly drug. It needs to be regulated!!!!!!!!!

Posted by Jack Genakos on 04 Apr 08 08:59 PM EDT
Based on Rep. Dingle's argument, drugs like methamphetamine,cocaine and heroin should not be regulated. Jobs like Emergency Room staff, police, drug counselors, and ambulance drivers depend on this, and there are alot of people addicted to this and they've got tohave thrie fix...DUHHHHH!!

Posted by David Lane Stonecypher,JSOCC SIGNALS Curriculum Author on 04 Apr 08 03:40 PM EDT
In America, We say that we protect children by establishing drug free zones. Nicotine is a drug and the delivery system typically is a cigarette. The hypocrisy issue is not lost on our children. I assure you that they look for any signs of a double standard in adults. Unfortunately, this institutional or systemic acceptance of tobacco standards re-enforces what many children have witnessed at home. My question is this; do we accept the boundaries that come with being a role model in society or not? While we have made some progress, Mitch McConnell's Kentucky still leads the nation in underage smokers and tobacco use. Most parents, including the ones who smoke believe that’s undesirable. Bravo to this legislation; to bad it comes to late for the millions that have perished from tobacco over the past 50 years.

Posted by Jerry Parker on 04 Apr 08 10:23 AM EDT
I agree with the FDA regulating the tobacco industry. We teach our children about the high addictive potential of Nicotine and even place it into the group with Cocain and Heroin. Maybe the FDA could work on a better warning message on the product to help save the lives of our young people.

Posted by Angel Cosme on 04 Apr 08 09:15 AM EDT
My comment pertains to this quote: "And more importantly, there are a lot of people out there who are addicted to this and they've got to have their fix." It sounds as though Rep. John Dingell is saying "Look, we can not ban cigarettes because people are addicted to them and since they need to smoke, who are we to stop them?" I say let's offer assistance to smokers and allow for some form of regulation that can potentially save lives.

Posted by Brian Patrick McLaughlin MS on 04 Apr 08 08:31 AM EDT
Nicotine is a drug. It should be a schedule one drug as it is very addictive and dangerious.If the tobacco pushers don't want to be regulated..ok ...have them make a product without an addictive chemical in it. Or one that does not kill people. Jobs are in question...without tobacco we would need far less oncology clinics.A cig is a medical device it delivers a drug into the human body as does a needle.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.