Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Higher Taxes, More Regulation on Horizon for Tobacco Industry
November 24, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The U.S. tobacco industry is likely to be hit with higher taxes and more regulation as its political influence wanes and a Democratic president takes office, Dow Jones reported Nov. 14.

In 2009 Congress is expected to raise federal tobacco taxes to pay for expanding the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) -- previously vetoed by President Bush -- and pass a law giving the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory power over tobacco products.

"Both the FDA bill and the SCHIP funded by tobacco tax have demonstrated bipartisan support and therefore present the new Congress and the new president with the opportunity for early victories," said Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. "This president and this Congress is likely to be more supportive to efforts to reduce tobacco use than any in history."

"It's a more adversarial environment for tobacco companies," said industry analyst Christopher Growe, who predicts that the expected SCHIP tax could raise the price of a pack of cigarettes 15 percent and result in a 5-10 percent decline in cigarette sales. A spokesperson for Reynolds American said the new taxes could result in higher illegal sales of cigarettes, while a spokesperson for Altria -- parent company of Philip Morris -- said the firm would continue to oppose increases in federal tobacco taxes.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by maxwood on 11 Dec 08 04:50 PM EST
Note that the analyst says a tax rate rise of 15% could reduce sales 5-10 percent. A net bonanza for government beyond the intended "good effect" of reducing used dosages. SCHIP at least specifies a government use but it is not a smoking-abatement program. Since the 1998 Clinton-Gore settlement very little of the eventual $200 bil. has been going to smoking abatement programs. Meanwhile government keeps acquiring a greater and greater vested interest in the prolongation of the tobacco empire and spending nearly $10 bil. per year prosecuting cannabis users must be seen as the most obvious way the government operates to protect that tobacco interest.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.