Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Florida Woman Murdered in Undercover Drug Sting
May 14, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

A Florida woman arrested for possession of marijuana and ecstasy was pressed into service as a drug informant, then murdered during a sting operation where she was told to purchase 1,500 ecstasy pills, cocaine, and a gun from a pair of drug dealers.

ABC News reported May 13 that the body of Rachel Morningstar Hoffman, 23, was found two days after she disappeared following a meeting with the drug dealers. Hoffman had agreed to take part in the staked-out drug buy in return for leniency in her drug case, where she faced possible prison time for possession of 200 grams of marijuana and a handful of ecstasy pills.

The dealers changed the location of the meeting at the last minute, and Hoffman went along with them despite a warning from investigators. "Safety is paramount," said Tallahassee Police spokesperson David McCranie. "The investigator said 'Don't do it.' We call these things off all the time. But Rachel went ahead and met [the dealers] and that ultimately lead to her murder."

The Tallahassee police have been sharply criticized for placing the recent Florida State University graduate in danger and failing to inform her attorney about the leniency deal.

"They're asking her to do something that would put her in a life-or-death situation," said lawyer Johnnie Devine. "I have never had any time where the police department has not called me to tell me this is what's happening ... She had never worked as an undercover agent. She had no experience or training in this matter."

The Florida Attorney General's office plans to conduct an independent investigation into the case.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:
(Comments now appear first to last)

Posted by clark brittan on 15 May 08 09:58 AM EDT
this is to be expected with the war on drugs, which is much more violent than would be the case with legalization and regulation... we don't seem to have learned much and suffer from impoverished sense of punitive options regarding behavior that we don't like...

Posted by Teresa on 15 May 08 12:00 PM EDT
Clark is 100% right. What will it take to change things?

Posted by Emily Swanzy on 15 May 08 05:46 PM EDT
Legalization does not automatically do away with the black market, cigarettes are available on the black market along with guns. The police warned her not to go, she made the choice. These are illegal behaviors, not just behavior not liked by some people. Most people that are a part of the drug world are well aware with the dangers involved, when they choose to participate they accept the terms of the game.

Posted by SorrowBrow on 16 May 08 11:08 AM EDT
I can't understand Emily's remarks here... you compare this to a black market for cigarettes and guns? They are legal and readily had via legal means. This women died after being essentially forced by police into doing something she obviously had no idea how to do properly. ASk yourself... Is this another way to curb the massive influx of "drug war" prisoners into our overtaxed prison system? She was 23 yrs. old...just a kid. Couldn't we have just helped her out of the mess she was in? Did she have a drug problem or was there any other way to save her life besides putting her in the face of deeper trouble? She was a college graduate according to the story... she must have been a reasonably smart person who found herself in a bad situation. The police apparently gave her an "deal she couldn't refuse". I'm saddened by this event. It should not have happened like it did. This event exemplifies to me that we have an out of control drug enforcement system that needs to be fixed.

Posted by Me on 16 May 08 01:47 PM EDT
They warned her not to go... she went anyway.. she knew what she was doing all along the way. She could have just taken full responsibility for her actions, not made any "deals" and went straight to prison. She knew she was taking risks. And obviously if she had felt she needed protection, she would have sought it from the very police she was working undercover for. This is an unfortunate case where this person underestimated the danger she was in. End of story.

Posted by Bil Crane on 19 May 08 10:19 AM EDT
The action by the police is outrageous and should have never been allowed. I do not believe that she "went ahead" in spite of a warning - she had to have believed it was still OK. Any police officers reckless enough to place a young woman in this kind of danger, would be deceitful enough to lie about "warning her not to go." What, in God's name, were they thinking?

Posted by Informer on 20 May 08 08:24 AM EDT
Lets say that she did know the consequences of her actions, and did try and get these menaces to society caught using entrapment for the state forces. Also lets consider that she was painted a picture of her future, in which she would have a drug conviction on her record and after studying for years for her qualifications they mean didly squat to her now as she will not be able to get a job with her convictions. So the cops offer her a deal that if you risk your life for us you will have this whole episode dissapear for good and you can get on with your life. They used her, and then set her up as an example to the masses, and it also reinforces the control they already have on their touts on the streets.....wakeup America, your reality is fracturing!!

Posted by Chee on 09 Jun 08 03:07 PM EDT
I knew her,and for all who read this article rachel wasnt some intense hardcore drugdealer.This college grad student was given an ultimatum,jail time or sting operation-completely backed by law enforcement.But lookat the set up- a 23 year old girl meeting two male drug dealers,to buy $1500 worth of drugs AND a gun.being put in this situation should not have even been an option.Obviously she's going to agree to work with the police,because who wants to do jail time."They"say she didn't follow orders,she was wearing a wire the whole time.Where were they?Can you honestly believe that a young girl would take the chance of doing something like this if she didnt have some sort of back up,some sort of thought in her mind that she was going to be safe?The war on drugs is a serious matter and something needs to be done about it,but it wasn't Rachels job to do it.I am appalled that this tragedy took place.Such an ugly situation could have been so easily prevented.She should have never even been given the option to be put in that situation.Hopefully this harsh reality opens eyes to take a look at the decisions we make in our lives,not to judge others on theirs. R.I.P. Rachel

Posted by Lidia on 24 Jul 08 12:15 PM EDT
It is very sad that the police involved with this whole mess really couldn't think of another way to solve things. She was only 23 years old going to prison is not something any 23 year old would wanna face, So why not paint her a pretty picture of everything will be ok once you do this when you know the consequences it could lead to and the risks involved. Do you honestly think that the dealers would not find out? They obviously have more experience in what "they" are doing then the police. To use a young girl as bate for something you know could cause her her life is just disgusting. Im pretty sure that there were other options. This did not need to happen. The police needs to get on the ball and do their damn job. Young people with no experience should not be asked to participate in something that the very own police needs to get training on. This whole situation sickens me.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for everyone, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, brief, and on-topic. Comments are for discussion of the above article, not general rants or manifestos. Serial comments intended to circumvent the 250-word limit may be deleted.

  2. Do not post promotional web links, personal information or requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercial posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.