Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Fla. Girl's Father Seeks Law to Protect Informants
May 27, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The father of a Florida woman killed while acting as a police informant is seeking a law named for his daughter that would provide greater protection for young offenders who might be pressured into dangerous undercover work, the Tallahassee Democrat reported May 19.

Irv Hoffman, whose daughter, Rachel, 23, was murdered by a pair of drug dealers after agreeing to an undercover assignment in exchange for leniency on a drug charge, says the legislation would be called 'Rachel's Law.'

"I don't think kids should be doing police work," said Hoffman. "I am going to try to get a Rachel Law going so kids aren't used in this way."

Tallahassee Police had sent the recent college graduate to buy $13,000 worth of drugs and a gun from the dealers; she disappeared and was later found dead. "How do you send a kid in to do a deal like this?" said Mr. Hoffman. "Rachel was not an undercover police officer. This is not a civilian job."

"There are reasons she did what she did," said State Sen. Mike Fasano, whose district includes Hoffman's home town. "However, we don't want young people like her, who are naive to the risk they may be in, to be taken advantage of by any state agency."

"This is embarrassing to the city and this area that something of this nature would occur," said Tallahassee state Sen.  Al Lawson, who is poised to become the top Florida Senate Democratic leader. "I'm willing to do whatever I can make sure something like this doesn't happen again."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by firebadcopsnow on 26 Jul 08 01:53 PM EDT
Police are trusted to serve and protect. Protect everybody, even young girls that make bad decisions. Remove every officer from the top down who encouraged this operation from their positions now before they get someone else killed. They do not have the common sense to protect the public. Mark their employee folders with "parking enforcement only"!!! These misguided heros should not be in important decision making jobs. Come on!!!!send in an untrained girl to do a sting on dangerous animals??? I don't care what she did, she was not qualified to handle the situation. How blind can you be??? I hate to have another law but I hope one is made to limit his kind of police thugery. Even the Mafia would take out one of their own for letting a young girl get killed this way. I expect so much more from the people entrusted to our publc safety

Posted by Larry J. Tedder on 02 Jun 08 05:21 PM EDT
I'm with Officer Winkler on this one. This has got to be one of the most egregious breaches of professional law enforcement ethics I've ever seen. This kind of thing is not, however, uncommon. It should never be allowed by law, period.

Posted by Tired of the rhetoric on 02 Jun 08 04:29 PM EDT
A 23 year old college graduate is hardly a kid. No one is questioning that she did use drugs so obviously she was aware of drug dealers and their tactics. To accuse police of using naive kids to do their work is not only naive itself but hypocritical. Perhaps if we support law enforcement and quit coddling drug abusers, these "kids" might be more motivated to make better choices in the first place. I understand the parent's grief, but the responsibility should be placed where it belongs, on the thugs that killed her.

Posted by Bill on 02 Jun 08 02:13 PM EDT
I had an A/D client in this type of position: work for the cops or go back to prison. He was drug- free at the time he was put in this situation and knew that he would have to go back to using drugs to do the job the police wanted him to do...but he hated prision. We spent many hours together trying to rationally come to a decision. Is this the right or wrong way to do police business? My question is: "What would YOU do if you had to choose between these two very bad options???

Posted by Anonymous on 02 Jun 08 11:27 AM EDT
A 23 year old woman is hardly a kid. We need to get back to some personal responsibility. Rachel was a college graduate and no one is questioning that she was using drugs so she was obviously already familiar with drug dealers. To say that cops are recruiting innocent, naive "kids" to do their work is ludicrous. Perhaps if we supported law enforcement a little more and coddled users a little less, the Rachels of this world might be more empowered to make better personal choices concerning illegal activities.

Posted by Cherry Joy on 01 Jun 08 05:37 AM EDT
Words can't describe how incredibly wonderful I feel after accidently discovering this story. I mean absolutly no disrespect to the life that's been lost or the many lives that are lost everyday, for that matter. And for what? A failed system hiden by a false purpose. I can go on and on about this issue and my openions have been formed by my own personal experience.Not read, not heard, but, lived. I feel nothing less than RAPED by the very people you would call for help in the event of a actual violation. I have spent the past 4 years looking for protection, direction even so much as a leg to stand on and hoping for that one body who is a somebody and could make a difference. Praise god I finally get a break. This one man soldier is joining this army. It's not if we'll make a difference it's when. Not one life lost will have been lost in vein. I Promise!!!!

Posted by Elaine on 28 May 08 02:32 PM EDT
I use the word "kid" to refer to someone who is immature. The police are trained in how to deal with people. They are aware of the risks involved. The informants are drug users. They have a tendency to make bad decisions. One of the reasons for making bad decisions is something that is known as arrested development. No one who is capable of good decision making skills would get involved with the drug world to this degree.The police use their training to coerce these individuals to feel either very scared of spending lengthy time in prison, or they "befriend" them and make them feel like they are important to get this job done.The age of the person is unimportant. This girl had limited life experience. I have dealt with similar scenarios many times in the past. What is even worse, once a person becomes an informant, they are used repeatedly to engage in very dangerous activities. This actually makes the informant feel like nothing bad could happen. Remember, we are talking about folks with poor decision making skills here. The police are totally to blame for putting a person with no law enforcement training into such a dangerous situation in the first place.

Posted by Adrianne on 28 May 08 11:59 AM EDT
Something that the original story mentioned that this one does not is that Rachel was told by police that if the dealers decided to change the location that she was to abort the operation. Well, the dealers did change the location and despite the warning from police Rachel decided to go with them anyway. I'm not saying that it is her fault because it isn't and I think what happened to her is absolutely tragic but she wasn't a "kid" she was an adult who was obviously old enough to get in trouble with drugs in the first place and old enough to make a bad decision that ultimately led to her demise. The police may be partially to blame for sending someone so inexperienced to do something so major but we don't know what she agreed to and what her attitude about it was, she very well may have been 100% willing to take this risk. My point is that I don't think the police are completely to blame for this, they are at least partially to blame yes, but not completely.

Posted by Elaine on 28 May 08 11:51 AM EDT
Thank you, Frank. I am pleased to hear the viewpoint of a former law enforcement agent. I agree 100%. We use the term kid to mean any young/naive person. My question is this: what can we do, where do we start?

Posted by Frank Winkler on 28 May 08 11:43 AM EDT
Speaking as a former cop with 25 years service, including several as chief, and 18 more in substance abuse treatment and prevention since, this is outrageous and should be a clear violation of law, much less ethics and common sense. Heads should roll from the chief on down. It is all too common a practice to pressure and coerce violators, especially the younger and more naive to participate in such "undercover" roles-- threats of prison can prove a powerful motivator. As noted above, this is extremely dangerous for even the trained and experienced, especially an operation on the scale described. It reflects a total disregard by key departmental decission-makers for the lives of those deemed less worthy. There simply can be no justification for such intentional and reckless malfeasance. Tallahassee needs and deserves better, and actionable accountability is in order. Citizens and government leaders alike need to make their demands known loud and clear.

Posted by Elaine on 28 May 08 11:00 AM EDT
This is an example of the police using someone they consider expendable to do a job that always has life-threatening consequences. They use either scare tactics or coercion to make these young folks go along with an idea that is very dangerous. The agencies that do this are interested in how many people they can arrest and how much money they can apply for in grants by showing the number of drug arrests made. None of these tactics stops drug usage. Sometimes the police make the informant feel safe, protected, like they are part of the team. In reality, they could care less. The sad part is that a lot of drug users get into drugs because of not fitting in, or because they want to feel loved. I encourage all parents to please be supportive if your kid gets in trouble. The police will tell the young person,"don't tell anyone, not even your family". Please try to keep another person from making the same mistake as Rachel. I know from experience. I am a drug counselor and have discussed this problem with many people.

Posted by Anonymous on 28 May 08 10:13 AM EDT
This story is interesting to me in the fact that a 23 year old is continuously referred to as a "kid". It is sad and tragic that she died. However, she is an adult and made a decision to participate in this undercover work. I do agree something needs to be done, although I would like to see the law be more accurate about what types of situations undercover people will be in and what the outcomes may be so they are able to make an educated decision. I wish this situation much luck.

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 28 May 08 09:01 AM EDT
The LAW sent her to her DEATH plain and simple. Those that have SWORN to SERVE and PROTECT ( I think thats suppose to mean the PUBLIC not THEIR OWN INTERESTS.) DRUGS KILL more in this manner than they do in their day to day use ever have or ever will,(in my opinion) This is one of MANY reasons for DRUG LAW REFORMS in this country.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.