Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Federal Officials May Use Plea Agreements to Block Crack-Cocaine Releases
February 12, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

U.S. Attorney Terrance P. Flynn, the lead federal prosecutor for Western New York, says he may use a legal waiver included in federal plea agreements to prevent crack-cocaine offenders from petitioning for early release under recently amended sentencing rules, the Buffalo News reported Feb. 11.

The U.S. Sentencing Commission recently lowered penalties for crack-cocaine offenses to bring them more in line with penalties for powdered cocaine and made the changes retroactive, meaning that some offenders now in prison could be eligible for release. But the plea agreements signed by hundreds of federal drug offenders in Western New York include a promise that offenders will never ask for a reduced sentence.

"At this point, we haven't decided whether we will try to enforce the waiver," said Assistant U.S.  Attorney Joseph M. Guerra III, Flynn's top drug prosecutor. "We've talked about the situation with [Justice Department] officials in Washington, and we're waiting for guidance or directives from them."

Frank B. Mesiah, president of the Buffalo NAACP, said, "It would be wrong for [prosecutors] to challenge that. If the U.S. attorney follows that policy, he will be adding even more inequities to the system."

Buffalo defense lawyers James P. Harrington, added that such a position "would go against the spirit of what Congress and the sentencing commission were trying to do when they decided that these sentences should be reduced."

Federal judges ultimately will decide who gets released. "This issue [on the waivers] has not come before us yet. If it does come before us, we'll decide on it," said Richard J. Arcara, chief U.S. district judge for Western New York. "There are a lot of complicated issues surrounding the changes in the crack sentences. We're already looking at these issues, and we'll be deciding these cases as expeditiously and fairly as we can. It will be a high priority."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by kybluegirl48 on 13 Feb 08 12:16 PM EST
As a recovering person, I am very concerned about the individuals that are incarcerated that have a medically proven disease. As long as they are incarcerated they may not be getting the treatment needed for the disease, and therefore their chances of repeated offensives are overwhelming. If incarceration is not part of the solution, then it will be apart of the problem.

Posted by FN Ingram on 13 Feb 08 08:31 PM EST
STOP-the-INSANITY, ENOUGH-is-ENOUGH The WAR on DRUGS was lost a long time ago.The Industrial Prison Systems is used to house the walking wounded left over the DRUG WAR.As a Tax-Paying Citizen I am worn out from funding the America Industrial Prison System (for Profit).Remove the sick from the prison systems, get the sick into proper care facility and treatment.Our country will benefit from rehabilitation instead of de-humanization.

Posted by Nilvik on 15 Feb 08 11:19 AM EST
How about saving some tax dollars? Effective addiction treatment costs but a small fraction of incarceration cost

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines