Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Executive Office Empties as Hazelden Struggles with Culture Change
May 12, 2008

Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Hazelden is one of the most famous addiction-treatment programs in the U.S., but its top executives have been leaving in droves despite the program's apparently good fiscal health, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported May 11.

President and CEO Ellen Breyer departed Hazelden, following five other top Hazelden officials to have left the company. Observers say that Hazelden is attracting more patients and donors than ever, and continues to grow, but Breyer has been both praised and vilified for focusing the Minnesota-based treatment provider on the bottom line.

Hazelden has long been known for its charity care, and though the days when high-profile celebrities chose the program when they wanted to get clean are gone, it has maintained an excellent reputation. Breyer was hired to help the program deal with the challenges of managed care and a more competitive treatment market, and brought more of a corporate mentality to Hazelden than previous presidents.

Among Breyer's major accomplishments was signing a deal with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, which now accounts for 30 percent of Hazelden's patient revenues. Observers say the move made it harder for high-end patients to get into treatment, and charity care also declined. However, Hazelden treated a record 10,754 patients in 2007, and raised $12 million from donors.

Breyer also approved the use of more pharmaceutical drugs in treatment, and focused more on academic credentialing of staff, which rankled some members of the traditional, recovery-oriented treatment community. "Hazelden used to be looked at as the mother ship, the mecca," said Dan Cain, president of the Minnesota treatment program RS Eden. "That level of awe, of deference, has diminished significantly."

"There's the recovery movement, and there's the AA movement. Then there are organizations, Hazelden being one of them, trying to provide services to people in these movements," said Breyer. "We are not exactly the same ... Sometimes people think we should match up."

Breyer was named administrator of the year in 2006 by the National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers, but as she worked to change the culture at Hazelden, a number of other top officials departed, including Hazelden's general counsel, director of research communications, chief medical officer, chief financial officer, and market development chief.

William Cope Moyers, Hazelden's public policy leader, called the changes made by Breyer "necessary, challenging and inevitable," but added, "I knew it was going to be hard to get resources for things other than our bottom line."

Soon after announcing that Hazelden would move from its longtime headquarters in Center City to downtown Minneapolis, Breyer resigned. The treatment provider is now looking for a new CEO, chief medical officer, and chief financial officer.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by walter d on 20 May 08 03:42 PM EDT
where money comes in, recovery goes out the window, after many, many years of being sober, it comes down to this "YOU BABY THEM, YOU BURY THEM" Get to the meetings. einstein

Posted by Anonymous on 20 May 08 10:05 AM EDT
Managed Care, and all that term implies, has been the cause of a flood of competent and certified treatment professionals (myself included after 31 years) leaving the D&A profession. When I had to spend more time hustling paperwork and worrying about client funding than providing treatment I knew (very sadly) that it was time to go.

Posted by Eileen on 19 May 08 01:38 PM EDT
RickET is is 100% correct. Addiction is a biological problem. Some addicts are able to stay sober with AA/counseling. However this is not the case for others whose addiction is more severe. Medical treatment, which research has poven to be effective, is necessary for many addicts--alcohol, drugs or nicotine.

Posted by Rick ET on 19 May 08 12:53 PM EDT
The problem with many treatment programs is that they are run by people who got sober in AA. While this works for many people there are those it does not work for. $15,000 to be told to go to more meetings and call your sponsor is NOT TREATMENT! Ever changing topics of the day in poorly facilitated interaction groups is NOT TREATMENT! If addiction is biological then why is the "treatment" sociological? If addiction is not a Moral failing then why do I need God to "cure" it?

Posted by frjimt on 19 May 08 12:23 PM EDT
God certainly has a sense of humor. H's beginnings trace back to clergy in need to treatment & it truly gave many of us our lives back & open doors for meetings to take place. I seems that G must have taken the day off, seeing many of the "thoughts" posted. After all, "I know best" what is good for me! right. My best thinking..... instead of telling the world about what H did or did not do for me/my child, boss, neighbor. I get honest, call my sponsor & get to a meeting.

Posted by Linda in Hinsdale, NH on 19 May 08 10:13 AM EDT
Been sober since 1981. Addiction is a spiritual disease, as well as physical, mental and emotional. That's why the 12 steps have (God/Higher Power/call it what you want) in them, and that's why they work. Folks can pay for all the treatment in the world, but the real bottom line is spiritual. Not monetary. Nonetheless, many people need the structure of treatment to achieve sobriety, and the people running these organizations deserve to get paid for their time. Treatment isn't a science yet, but I think in the past 50 years we are getting better at the art of treatment. Science and Religion are like the wings of a bird - humanity needs both to fly.

Posted by Kevin Cook on 19 May 08 09:27 AM EDT
Recovery is an inside out job and success rates are dependant on the willingness of the participant to work the process. Hazelden has the luxury of accepting clients with a lot to give. Organizations like Agape House Ministry in Atlanta are left with those uninsured, homeless clients, whom are facing incarceration or incliment weather as their motives. Irregardless, the responsibility of recovery lies within the client.

Posted by Lauren Carter on 19 May 08 08:58 AM EDT
I am sober 28 years in AA and a counselor for 26. Hazelden has been a leader in many ways, and like everyone else, has had to deal with change - in order to keep the doors open. Unfortunately, because AA/NA and other self-help groups are free, I think there is a public mindset that treatment "should be" free as well( or, almost). the world doesn't work that way. "Non Profit" merely means extra income beyond expenses gets plowed back into the corporation to continually improve its services - unlike "For Profit" that goes to the CEO's and shareholders.

Posted by Wanda on 16 May 08 03:18 AM EDT
Unfortunately, managed care has required many traditional treatment centers to put extreme "cultural" changes into place. My gripe is that these facilities continue to put themselves out there as "not for profit" or "non-profit" as they focus on the dollars brought in. Hazelden is not the only example. ROSECRANCE in Rockford, IL, is another prime example. Adults with $15,000 in their pockets or strong insurance go to the front of the line. Others sit on a six-month waiting list just to be given an assessment that usually gets them no closer to a treatment bed. The place is a joke and should be taxed appropriately.

Posted by Frank Kelly on 14 May 08 11:27 PM EDT
It's time for all these so called treatment programs to pack it in which have only become piggy bank for the stakeholder with programs which never had overwhelming progress. Onl a few converted die hard who probally would have quit any way given the proper encouragement ( spending their own money or going to jail), primary prevention is the best treatment.

Posted by Richard on 14 May 08 07:27 PM EDT
If addiction is disease then what are the reasons it is treateded by most providers as a moral issue, Stps 4-7. Research has shown that 12 step programs have a success rate of around 5%. If did step would never have to go past 3, think about it. I am a recovered person and live a happy life without involvement in a religious cult. Have a good day. It's your choice.

Posted by Linda Carr on 14 May 08 08:12 AM EDT
There is a saying that "If it works don't fix it"! I have been in recovery continuously for 23 years. I went to a treatment facility modeled after Hazelden. In this area the majority of people that followed what they said are still clean. I am not sure what moderation means that is here to stay, but I have witnessed the "new" models of treatment do not work. Treatment centers that push AA/NA and are centered around 12 step recovery are the ones sending out successful recovering people. In my opinion the "new" treatments are enabling people literally to death. Addiction is a disease and treatment of this disease was not broken. AA/NA have worked for many many years. I agree technology should change as there are always upgrades, I'm not so sure the care of patients is one of those things that need to change.

Posted by David Caldwell, LCSW on 13 May 08 07:23 PM EDT
Hazelden is a dinosaur. Coerced treatment in that type of program will soon be a thing of the past. Moderation, harm reduction & TRULY individualized treatment with goals set by the client are here to stay.

Posted by Michael Fightmaster on 13 May 08 06:38 PM EDT
I successfully completed the basic thirty day program in Minnesota back in 1994. I went from Minnesota to West Palm Beach, Fla to enter their extended care program. I didn't establish any substantial clean time until I went through a program in Boca Raton. I do believe Hazelden's methods exclude many people due to lack of sensitivity to those on the ends of the Bell curve. Also, I think they should use recent research and technological developments.

Posted by dado on 13 May 08 10:45 AM EDT
Lynn Carraoll was right, in spades!

Posted by Judy Kirkwood on 13 May 08 09:26 AM EDT
P.S. See my blog comment on this at http://motherwarriors.blogspot.com/2008/05/hazelden-treatment-center.html

Posted by Ohsawa on 13 May 08 09:25 AM EDT
It becomes important to not confuse the secular with the spiritual. If AA mentored Hazelden into the arena, then it moved into a new arena of thinking, where now, "others" where the helpers, instead of the original idea where those who "were" sick help those who "are" sick, Then Darwin was right and the future will tell all.

Posted by Gail on 13 May 08 09:02 AM EDT
Change is inevidatable - that is life. Treatment centers have been criticized over the years because they have moved away from teaching people a new way of life. It has become much more diffucult over the years since insurance companies won't pay or pay very little. Centers have had to become much more creative with most stays averaging 2 weeks. What is missing in all this information is "what is Hazelden doing to get people on the path of recovery". I am a 20 yr alumni of Hazelden and have continued to support them with donations until recently when I found out my donations were going into a general fund rather than into the scholarship fund, which I had requested, to help those without insurance. Hazelden helped me get on the road of recovery, but I have questioned "are they more concerned about making it a profitable organization or helping people"? It is a fine balance. There is a lot of information missing from this article, so I won't read between the lines, but maybe this is the best thing that could happen to get Hazelden back on track of what it's primary perpose is.

Posted by Judy Kirkwood on 13 May 08 08:41 AM EDT
My experience with Hazelden for my then teenage son 3 years ago was oddly substandard. When I talked about it I found out that many parents had had the same experience and that it was thought that Hazelden was "stuck," not responding to the needs of its clientele, many of whom are dual-diagnosis. They kicked my son out because he didn't want to be there--he was 16; you bet he didn't want to be there. I'm glad to see some changes but hope Moyers stays.

Posted by Donald Schwartz on 13 May 08 08:32 AM EDT
Change in culture is a tramatic experience for most staff members but is required to keep abreast of a constantly changing world. I would disagree with going to all credentialed people. The loss of creative thinking is a serious risk when people are trained to think inside the box to get the job done. Lay people are very serious providing help and are much more adaptable to a given situation. Credentialed people tend to fit patients into their box rather than solving the problems. A change in philosophy can easily cause executives to leave a corporation. It is too bad she is giving up. It is not hard to get qualified supporters on board to replace the ones that abandoned ship. There are very strong feelings about how treatment should be done, at what cost and for whom. Putting a totally professional face on an organization can be smoke and mirrors but she has done such a great job and will be missed. D Schwartz-Director - Recovery School of southern Minnesota

Posted by Larry Beachump on 12 May 08 11:37 AM EDT
Leaders come. Leaders go. Hazelden endures. Remember the mantra that is the epitome of the journey: "Progress, not perfection."

Your Turn! Post a public comment (guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES:
Comments are meant for thoughtful public discussion of the article published above. Therefore:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, focused, and on-topic.

  2. Do not post personal requests for help (see resources).

  3. Proof your comments carefully for spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

  4. Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated comments are prohibited.

We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.