Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Critics Attack Ramstad as Possible Drug Czar Candidate
December 10, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Former Rep. Jim Ramstad (R-Minn.) might not even be in the running for the job of Barack Obama's drug czar, but that hasn't stopped critics from saying he would be a poor choice because of his past opposition to needle-exchange programs and medical marijuana.

Ramstad's name has been floated as a possible pick for director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) in the Obama administration, although some sources say he is more likely to be tapped as head of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

Letter-writing campaigns by the Drug Policy Alliance (DPA), a group of addiction-treatment professionals led by the past president of the addictions division at the New York State Psychological Association, and the National Black Police Association (NBPA) urge the president-elect not to make Ramstad the nominal chief of the national war on drugs.

"While we applaud Representative Ramstad for his courageous and steady support for expanding drug treatment access and improving addiction awareness, and honor his own personal and very public triumph over addiction, we have strong reservations about his candidacy for the drug czar position," according to the letter sent to Obama and signed by DPF and NBPA as well as a variety of AIDS prevention groups and others. "In his twenty-eight years in the U.S. House, Representative Ramstad has consistently opposed policies that seek to reduce drug-related harm and create common ground on polarizing issues."

Writing in the Huffington Post, Maia Szalavitz also criticized Ramstad for once earmarking $235,000 for the Minnesota chapter of the controversial Teen Challenge program.

Obama's transition team has not made any public announcements about filling the position of ONDCP director.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Greg Williams, Memphis, TN on 10 Dec 08 12:47 PM EST
Hey Rep. Ramstad for supporting teen challenge, not supporting needle exchange and medical marijuana! I am an A & D counselor who has been on the front line of this war for many years. Why would you exchange needles with addicts? Or for that matter, why would you give condoms to high school students? Think about what message you are sending people, or are you just giving up and saying," Go have safe sex(whatever that is) and here is some fresh needles, now go shoot up some more dope, safely"?!

Posted by Rokki on 10 Dec 08 06:05 PM EST
Why give clean needles? I am one of many users,now in treatment,whose life was saved due to NEP's. My husband had contracted aids back in 91,but due to the NEP I was not infected.However he is dead and I'm alive. Like I said I am one of many. I worked in the trenches as well,have for many yrs. NEP's do not say heres some needles now go shoot dope. They exchange one for one,more if they manage to get funding. I don't believe you can see the big picture through your 12 step nazi attitude. Condoms are a good thing. It's called Prevention,Greg. It's less costly then aids medications and jail and hospitals. Prevention is a good thing.

Posted by Lisa on 11 Dec 08 08:22 AM EST
Yes, Greg--far better to believe that teens will stop having sex and people will stop abusing drugs if you simply tell them it is dangerous and "morally wrong"--and if anyone fails to heed your call, well, let 'em die--who needs 'em? Right? BTW, Teen Challenge is a fundamentalist Christian group that has been accused of many abuses and uses NO evidence based science in their treatment of "wayward" teens and adults.

Posted by Tim on 11 Dec 08 08:40 AM EST
Hey Greg, as a fellow 12 step nazi, I'm with you. Why in the world would we try and help people with a program that works...for everyone that tries, regardless of race, religeon or creed...when we can simply accept unacceptable behavior? Monitarily, I have to agree with the rest of ya'll. For many, it would be cheaper to buy them a place to live, give 'em the stuff they need/want, and then sit back and watch them die. As for myself, I'm hoping to save at least one starfish.

Posted by James on 11 Dec 08 09:15 AM EST
Just a thought...why must it be all or none? Do not misunderstand, I agree wholeheartedly that 100% abstinence is the road to recovery. Until a person is abstinent, why not do all we can to keep them as healthy as possible. For some 12 steps is all it takes, for others detox and treatment, for some of us both, etc. Why not make exchanging the needles contingent on attending treatment? I know that has its problems, but I think it could be viable. In theory methadone was going to work that way. Unfortunately, it rarely seems to-with minimal treatment happening at many clinics. We have different means, but we are on the same side. I think we all want people to live free of the chains and scars of addiction. Just a thought...

Posted by Eric Helmuth, Join Together on 11 Dec 08 10:17 AM EST
We're always glad to see thoughtful and spirited debate, but please leave the name-calling out of it. Terms like "Nazi" don't belong here and we reserve the right to delete posts that violate the guidelines below.

Posted by Vincent Walker on 11 Dec 08 10:24 AM EST
Interesting attitudes here. I thought addiction was a disease. Why is there no compassion? If these people had cancer, would you deny care because they brought it on themselves due to bad lifestyle choices?

Posted by Tom Sledd,Tampa Fl. on 11 Dec 08 03:12 PM EST
Without the passion and vision of people like Rep. Ramstad we will never make a dent in the Addiciton War. What a great choice he would be to bring his talent and expierence to the #1 health need in our society.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 12 Dec 08 10:36 AM EST
The gold standard for needle exchange is in Vancover yet in all the years it has been opperating Vancover's HIV and Hep C numbers are still high. As for Harm Reduction the problem is that programs don't work to get individuals abstinent. At my agency we have Harm Reduction programs and I have offered access to County Funded beds in treatment and in SIX years they have used TWO beds. Ramstad would be a great choice.

Posted by JKushner on 12 Dec 08 10:38 AM EST
If he is hated by the Drug Policy Alliance, he must be the right man for the job.

Posted by Lydia Meyers, Detroit on 15 Dec 08 09:07 AM EST
To John from Oceanside: If your HIV infection rate isn't coming down and your clients are not choosing treatment, your NEP program needs new leadership. We have seen a sustained drop in IDU transmission, and record high IDU admission rates. Your staff needs more training.

Posted by Greg Williams, Memphis on 15 Dec 08 10:02 AM EST
I am so glad to see such an emotional dialog thanks to some comments I posted last week. Hey Lisa, Teen Challenge uses an evidence based practice, Abstinence. It is 100% for certain that a child will not get pregnant if they do not have sex. When do you guys think it will be ok for society to know that if they make certain choices they have certain consequences,good and bad? I am in recovery. I advocate choice in addiction. If you choose to use drugs, if you share needles, rob and steal from people to support your drug use then there are terrible consequences. We could just give out lots of free money to addicts so they wouldn't be tempted to steal something and then they wouldn't run the risk of being shot or put in jail!? If I trade a clean needle for a dirty one, why stop there. How about trading a new crack pipe for one that has been broken and could cut someones lip thereby causing infection? I work in the treatment and prevention field. I know of cases where someone has been killed for breaking someone elses crack pipe. This sounds pretty silly, doesn't it?

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines