Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Cocaine, Methamphetamine Medication Studies Show Promise
December 10, 2008

Share Share Email
email
Print
print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The success of methadone and buprenorphine in opiate addiction treatment has prodded researchers to investigate the use of other medications as therapy for cocaine and methamphetamine addiction, Time reported Dec. 8.

The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) has funded small studies on use of potential anti-addiction drugs including dexamphetamine, a form of amphetamine, and modafinil, an alertness drug used to treat narcolepsy and shift-work sleep disorders. Studies of dexamphetamine in both Britain and Australia showed positive findings when administered to stimulant users, and a study of modafinil at the University of Pennsylvania found that the drug reduced rates of cocaine use.

Conceding that there is "more discussion than data" on treatment medication for cocaine and meth, Frank Vocci, director of NIDA's pharmacotherapy, said, "It's an idea that really does need to be rigorously evaluated."

The studies of dexamphetamine and similar drugs have not revealed major safety problems. "There's pretty consistent evidence that the side effects are generally nominal," said John Grabowski, professor of psychiatry at the University of Minnesota. Modafinil has less addiction risk than amphetamines but it is less effective in treating the most severe addictions.

Champions of maintenance treatment note that 30 percent of cocaine and amphetamine addicts suffer from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and that their addictions may be an effort to self-medicate. A pilot study conducted at Columbia University found that maintenance treatment reduced cocaine use and craving in 12 cocaine addicts with ADHD.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by OldTimer on 11 Dec 08 01:11 PM EST
The "success of methadone of buprenorphine." As a long time substance abuse counselor, I see very little evidence of that in the field. Although I am sure there are some honorable clinics, most of the clients I see are told by the clinics that both of these drugs are "maintenance" drugs, meaning they will have to keep coming to the clinic for life to get their fix. Neither methadone nor buprenorphine were initially marketed for that purpose. In addition, most clients go to several sources, so they can sell the dose they get from one source on the streets to pay for the other. Although I have not seen this problem with buprenorphine, my clients on methadone keep taking ever increasing doses until at about 200 mg or so, they walk around in a stupor or start using cocaine to stay awake. The biggest tradgedy of both these medications is that it keeps people in their addiction under the false guise of receiving "treatment" while clinics and drug companies profit. If this is called success, I would hate to see what is defined as failure.

Posted by Luciano Colonna on 11 Dec 08 02:07 PM EST
Dear Old Timer, You are incorrect when you state that neither methadone nor buprenorphine were initially marketed for the purpose or "maintenance". Both therapies have been used for detox and maintenance since their approval as treatments. Regarding your statement "my clients on methadone keep taking ever increasing doses until at about 200 mg or so, they walk around in a stupor or start using cocaine to stay awake". Clients "doses" are dictated by the "Program", not the other way around. As far as why some of those enrolled in replacement therapy programs choose to use other drugs while in treatment - well the reasons are as complex as the reasons people used drugs in the first place. Research shows both methadone and buprenorphine to be highly successful therapies.

Posted by Christopher Cook on 12 Dec 08 08:42 AM EST
The reason for the great "success" of methadone and bupernorphine is we are treating an opiate addiction with opiates. Of course these "medications" curb craving and withdrawal...they are OPIATES. As such, they will and do have the same result when getting off becomes neccessary. Then we will see craving and withdrawal all over again. It seems we have abandoned common sense altogether. The question is, abandoned in favor of what?

Posted by OldTimer on 12 Dec 08 06:41 PM EST
Dear Luciano Colonna, I don't know where you receive your information, but go to the American Pain Society website (ampainsoc.org) and see that methadone use began as a painkiller named dolophine. Doctors experimented with it for acute opiate withdrawal in the 1950's. It wasn't until the 1960's that Vincent Dole began his maintenance experiments. The Reckitt Benckiser website suboxone.com, still does not mention lifetime buprenorphine maintenance but instead suggests use until "the dose is slowly and gradually tapered." However, programs desiring lifetime clients will suggest otherwise. I never suggested that clients set their own dosages but rather that the "Program" keeps increasing their dosages while turning a blind eye to other substances that clients are using. To state it again, I find it horrific that programs profit from medication peddling while keeping clients in their addiction. My suggestion would be that at a minimum, everybody who receives these drugs also are tested for cross addictions and get the chance to receive counseling and/or psychological screening and treatment. I am aware of programs that offer these services and they are truly lifesavers.

Posted by SobrietyRocks on 15 Dec 08 09:35 AM EST
Trading one drug for another, not a novel idea for an addict. And of course if you have a prescription for it, it is supposedly more socially acceptable.

Posted by brubin on 15 Dec 08 11:53 AM EST
i have seen in many cases methadone and suboxone eliminate disease (hiv-hep c)from sharing needles.also elimianting the violence of the drug trade(shootings,stabbings and other debilating forms of drug deal gone bad violence).if serious,these users can go to work(pay taxes) and live a life without violence and disease.(who pays for an addict to die in the hospital for a month?)

Posted by Psychusa on 16 Dec 08 10:12 AM EST
The same old arguments, both for and against methadone. Ignorance and prejudice seem to push the anti methadone group, while science and pro social outcomes defend maintenance. Let's try and consider how a treatment helps our clients rather than defending antiquated arguments to do away with what has shown to be a very effective treatment.

Posted by John on 16 Dec 08 10:55 AM EST
Also as a long time ADC and recovering addict let me tell you my personal experience. When I got on methadone after returning from Nam with a herion habit(1973) it was a God send as it allowed me to get off the street and quit committing crimes to support my addiction. I stayed on for two years and it was horrible coming off. While on, it was a ball and chain- back then it was not for profit, so they did not encourage life long maintenance. I have been clean for many years now although I did relapse after methadone use. I truly believe it's great for detox, but do not advocate for maintenance-just another life enslaving drug.

Posted by Luciano Colonna on 22 Dec 08 01:20 AM EST
I would like to suggest that those individuals interested in science based evidence google "Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine-2007-Collins-514-20-2.pdf" for accurate information regarding buprenorphine detoxification and maintenance.

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 07 Apr 09 10:41 AM EDT
Would cannabis work as a maintainence drug for any opiate based addictions? I don't know about helping with the D.T.s ( shakes, tremors ,nightmares, sweats, etc...) as I have not tried or been addicted to any of these sorts of drugs. I do know that it helped with my nicotine addiction. I am in NO WAY comparing my addiction to nicotine with a real drug addiction. Maybe it could be included in a step down approach. Opiate addicts could start out with suboxene or another of these types of addiction breaking drugs and gradually work down from these drugs to cannabis. Even if they continue using cannabis for years after breaking the opiate addiction , I ask "So What?" they have broken free from a KILLER. Just a question / inquiry. No harm, No foul.

Posted by Donald Parsons on 07 Apr 09 10:48 AM EDT
I have to revise my previous statement after re-reading the article. For full disclosure, for about 15-20 years I was considered a speed freak until one day I decided I didn't want my heart to explode in my chest and stopped usage.

Posted by Tim Baldwin on 16 Jul 09 08:43 PM EDT
I also wa s addicted to methamphetamine for 5 years and after being off of it for 2 years i could hold a menial labor job.13 years later I got into a recovery program and to finally funtion as a somewhat normal person. This was 15 years after I stopped using meth! up until that time i still missed it every day!

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Submissions are held for review and approval.
Please read the guidelines before posting.

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments