Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Coalition Forms to Keep N.J. Drinking Age at 21
September 5, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

In response to a national campaign to reopen debate on lowering the legal drinking age from 21 to 18, a group of New Jersey agencies and organizations has formed the NJ21 Coalition, the Associated Press reported Sept. 4.

The coalition includes the state Division of Highway Traffic Safety, Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, and the Partnership for a Drug-Free New Jersey.

"Since the drinking age was raised to 21 in New Jersey in the 1980s, we have seen nearly a 78 percent decrease in the number of young people ages 18 to 20 who have been killed in drunk driving crashes," said Attorney General Anne Milgram. "These numbers alone tell us without any doubt, the drinking age must be maintained."

Three presidents of colleges in New Jersey have signed onto the Amethyst Initiative, which calls for lawmakers to consider lowering the drinking age to 18. "Drinking alcohol is illegal for students under the age of 21, and yet, despite the imposition of policies and disciplinary procedures, it is evident that alcohol and alcohol-related injuries, binge drinking, and alcohol abuse is a fact of life on college campuses across the nation," said Montclair State University President Susan A. Cole. The presidents of the Stevens Institute of Technology and Drew University also back the initiative.

"This is nothing more than college presidents passing the buck instead of thinking of more constructive ways to crack down on underage drinking," said New Jersey Senate President Richard J. Codey. "Furthermore, it opens up the floodgates to allow alcohol into the hands of high school students who are 18."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Think For Yourself on 05 Oct 08 11:39 PM EDT
"tryingtounderstand" stated "Kids drinking whether it is legal or not, is a ridiculous reason to give them the thumbs up." ..that statement is 100% correct, but your missing the point. The current drinking age makes it difficult for young adults to get alcohol. This means when they do find a way to get alcohol, they tend to drink as much as they can while they have the opportunity. This makes for a bad drinking habit. If the age was lowered to 18, i believe that more young adults that have an interest in drinking will take it much slower. If you take away from a person, it makes them want it more just because they cant have it.

Posted by Vincent D'ambrisi on 15 Sep 08 09:49 AM EDT
3rd part: Also why is it fare that local police departments can go out and drink then drive, because there cops; its okay? What kind of role models are they? Who are they to enforce laws? One thing is for sure if a cop had an accident while drinking, and driving either off duty or on duty, it won’t make the papers. That is how our world works, and it’s unfortunate. In any situation things will be misconstrued and taken to the next level. I think that it’s unfair, the amounts of articles in papers due to underage drinking when, there are more important things out there to fill our papers such as information on our war, and our economy. Nj21 your foolish! Also the percentage that makes up your statistics comes from adults who are over 21 who have a drinking problem. Why not get them help and enforce stricter policies on the average alcoholic who buys a pint of vodka every day, Instead of pointing fingers at 18 year olds.

Posted by Vincent D'ambrisi on 15 Sep 08 09:47 AM EDT
2nd Part: Lowering the age would give young adults responsibility for their own actions, and many young adults won’t have to sneak around and drink. Fact is wither the age is changed from 21 to 20 or 18 or 12 drinking is still being done nationally especially on campuses. My question for NJ21 is why are you so worried about writing articles and putting statistics out there. If the drinking age is lowered and better restrictions are put on the purchases of alcohol and so forth then why shouldn’t the age be lowered?

Posted by Vincent D'ambrisi on 15 Sep 08 09:47 AM EDT
NJ21, if you can go to war at 18, why can’t we make our own decisions to drink at the age of 18? In your article you list the percentage of decreases in fatalities since 1980's but, you don’t list the percentage the government is making off tickets and summons, and other revenue from minors not following the law. Our government won’t lower the age simply to the fact that all they are worried about money. That’s all it comes down to.

Posted by Vincent D'ambrisi on 15 Sep 08 09:45 AM EDT
NJ21, if you can go to war at 18, why can’t we make our own decisions to drink at the age of 18? In your article you list the percentage of decreases in fatalities since 1980's but, you don’t list the percentage the government is making off tickets and summons, and other revenue from minors not following the law. Our government won’t lower the age simply to the fact that all they are worried about money. That’s all it comes down to.

Posted by tryingtounderstand on 08 Sep 08 07:40 PM EDT
I'm not opposed to the dialog of lowering the drinking age to take place. In fact I think any and all dialog on the issue is good, I've just yet to see any evidence what-so-ever that lowering the drinking age decreases drinking, or unsafe drinking. Kids drinking whether it is legal or not, is a ridiculous reason to give them the thumbs up.

Posted by Frank Plunkett on 08 Sep 08 05:23 PM EDT
These college proesidents are saying "when a problem seems to hard to deal with, GIVE UP". If they had a large percentage of students doing below average work would that then become the acceptble standard? NO WAY. The would be asking the state for more money to improve their programs. Also, I think the idea that lowering the drinking age will DECREASE underage drinking is ridiculous. What it will really do is assure that our kids start drinking at even younger ages and more often. It will also assure that more young inexperienced drivers will be drinking and driving and DYING.

Posted by CONCERNED on 08 Sep 08 10:38 AM EDT
I completely agree with George. In order for change to happen, the culture and social norms that surround alcohol need to change first. We, as a society need to start taking responsibility and change the social norms by promoting NOT drinking until the legal drinking age of 21. Children who begin drinking before the age of 21 are 5 times more likely to develop a problem with alcohol then those who wait until the age of 21. The first step everyone can do is join an undergae drinking coalition in their communities. Every county in the state of NJ has one. In my opinion lowering the drinking age would definitely not discourage rather encourage adolescents to drink alcohol. Alcohol is a gateway drug that can lead adolescents to experiment with other drugs. Society needs to be educauted on the dangers and consequences of alcohol. Perhaps we can start with the college presidents who support lowering the drinking age.

Posted by kathy arciszewski on 08 Sep 08 10:08 AM EDT
What can we expect from a nation that allowed tobacco dollars won in litigation to be utilized to balance governmental budgets rather than be used in public education for young people in the dangers of all drugs. We should be ashamed of ourselves. Kathy Arciszewski

Posted by Peter Rostenberg, MD FASAM on 08 Sep 08 09:59 AM EDT
Mr Codey should listen to the university presidents rather than condemn them. There is simply too much posturing and not enough consideration of the possiblity that these academic leaders know something we don't. "Crack down" is an unfortunate term. Would Mr Codey have the universities to increase tuition to hire a private police force? Should the municipal police be called into what is private property, the campus? Etc, Etc.

Posted by George on 08 Sep 08 08:31 AM EDT
Continuation.......Kids DO live up to adult expectations! We tell kids our expectations all the time with alcohol. "Don't drink and Drive" instead of don't drink. "Take the keys from a friends, don't let friends drive" instead of not hanging with or not allowing your friends to drink around you. "Be a responsible drinker, know your limit". How do you figure out "your limit"? Kids make it a competition. "I can drink as much as Johnny", when I don't it becomes my goal. The problem is by the time I can drink as much as Johnny, he has increased his tolerance and I'm still playing catch up. Here's the best one: "Parents, Talk to your Kids about drinking." I think that is one reason why kids do drink. Parents are talking to their kids all the time ABOUT drinking. After the softball game, during the football game, at the family reunion, at the kid’s birthday party, to celebrate a new job, to celebrate the loss of a job, and on and on it goes. Why don't we truly talk to our kids ABOUT NOT drinking? Because we EXPECT them to drink. They do live up to our expectations!

Posted by George on 08 Sep 08 08:28 AM EDT
What needs to be changed is the culture. We didn't see youth smoking start to decline until the culture shifted making the statement that "smoking is not socially acceptable". When that culture shift occurred, smoking rates among youth dramatically declined. Ask kids in the U.S. why they drink. They will tell you "to get drunk." Kids DO live up to adult expectations! See continuation.

Posted by Jennifer Flansburg on 07 Sep 08 08:57 PM EDT
in high schools kids are already drinkin some started at the age of 13. thats a national statistic, if kids want to drink they will. maybe lowerin the age might discourage underage drinking.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.