Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Cindy McCain's Addiction Led to Charity Shutdown, Other Damage
September 16, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Cindy McCain's well-publicized addiction to prescription painkillers cost a doctor his medical license and led to the shutdown of the charity where she illegally obtained her drugs, the Washington Post reported Sept. 12.

McCain has publicly acknowledged her addiction and recently has said that she plans to raise awareness about the issue if her husband, John McCain, becomes president. "I think [recovery] made me a better person as well as a better parent, so I think it would be very important to talk about it and be very upfront about it," McCain said, pledging to "to talk about it as much as possible because I don't want anyone to wind up in the shoes that I did at the time."

Less widely discussed, however, is the damage that McCain's addiction in the late 1980s and early 1990s caused to others. McCain convinced a doctor with the charity she founded, the American Volunteer Medical Team, to write phony prescriptions for prescription painkillers in the names of three staff members and give her the drugs. The staff members didn't know their names were being used.

The charity, which sent volunteer doctors and nurses on overseas mercy missions, kept supplies of prescription drugs like Vicodin, Percoset and Tylenol 3 to support its charitable mission.

After a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) investigation, the doctor, John Max Johnson, lost his medical license and has never practiced medicine again. The publicity and controversy around the McCain case also led to the charity shutting down.

Cindy McCain's parents confronted her about her addiction in 1992, and her recovery began shortly thereafter. However, in 1993 a former employee told the DEA about the drug diversion, and McCain was soon facing federal charges of falsely obtaining prescription drugs, which could have led to a 20-year prison sentence. A plea deal allowed her to avoid the charges and enter a diversion program, where she attended treatment and performed community service.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Dr. John on 23 Sep 08 08:08 PM EDT
I find your response, Mr. Curley, weak at best. 1. You are not and never have been a comprehensive news summary service. You have to be selective, and if front page of the Post is your justification for news, then you must have one heck of a left leaning limp. 2. Of interest to your readers, should be Cindy's recovery and the good the agency SHE founded did before having to close due to her addiction (55 missions over 7 years). Addicts suffer loss and cause loss. That can be presented as a victory or as a judgment. Gee, wonder which side your "summary" fell into? 3. You have covered Obama and his use of nicotine gum (with an interesting spin - chewing is better than smoking); his use of drugs (emphasizing that he used less than he reported - nice minimization); and that he quit smoking cigarettes (that would be another positive spin, wouldn't it?). This is nothing more than a blast at John McCain. I've been an addiction specialist for over 35 years, and the real news here is that people do recover. Please, dump the liberal bias. I can get that from the Post.

Posted by Robert Curley, News Editor, Join Together on 22 Sep 08 03:46 PM EDT
Thanks for all your comments on this story. If nothing else, it certainly demonstrates the difficulty of covering political issues during a feisty political season. Just a few quick points: 1. This is a news-summary service. The Cindy McCain story appeared on the front page of the Washington Post. That alone made it worthy of serious consideration by our news staff. 2. When deciding whether to summarize this article, what tipped the balance for us was the fact that Mrs. McCain stated that she intends to make addiction her primary issue if she becomes First Lady, and would draw upon her own personal experiences in that role. That takes the rest of her story -- which had not been told in such detail before the Post article -- out of the personal arena and into the political. In short, we felt that readers interested in addiction policy would be interested in the background of someone who might soon be helping to guide federal addiction policy. 3. We have covered Obama's past drug use, as well as his struggles with smoking and his position on medical marijuana. We encourage you to search this site for the keywords "Obama" and "McCain" to get a broader sense of our coverage.

Posted by Dr. Russ on 22 Sep 08 03:09 PM EDT
Your subtitle says "Advancing effective alcohol and drug policy, prevention, and treatment." Guess you blew it on this one. Get with you stated purpose or take me off your list. I do not like dealing with ignorance, but irgnorance is treatable. Stupidity, on the other hand is not treatable. We shall see where you stand. Kindest regards, Dr. Russ

Posted by Licensed Clinical Professional Counselor on 22 Sep 08 02:20 PM EDT
I work in addictions every day - it's a nasty problem, regardless of the addiction - AND it is no respecter of persons! It doesn't care whether you are Republican or Democrat. FYI, it isn't just the "rich" people who get indiscriminate sentences - talk to anyone in prison. Some get only a few months for drug use - others get years! For the angry woman, I doubt your anger will fade regardless of who wins the election!

Posted by Blue Duck on 22 Sep 08 01:28 PM EDT
This article is intended to slam McCain. If Cindy McCain is in recovery, then more power to her. It does not however, require her to become a poster child for addiction treatment. People with influence and money mostly get the better deals in our criminal justice system. Is that a surprise to anyone?

Posted by Greg on 22 Sep 08 11:56 AM EDT
This is Recovery Month! I thought the idea is to promote healthy change by drawing attention to successes in recovery. Is this not relevant? Posting this article bares fruit, considering our degree of professional subjective bias. I mean really, “choice!” Does a predisposed genetic condition offer a choice? Do infants choose their childhood experiences? Do our children actually decide they would like to become an addict? Some appear to understand the etiology and process of addiction and others how best to deal with it socially. While I am aware of cures and preventions for things like polio and syphilis and have not read about the penicillin for addiction yet, I am certainly interested in learning how Mrs. McCain was able to recover. I am also very interested in her genome and childhood experiences. Mostly, I am interested in how she manages, as relapse often follows efforts to recover. Any chance we could get her to comment on our discussion here? Keep up the great work everyone, Kind regards, Greg

Posted by Philip on 22 Sep 08 10:35 AM EDT
This article has all the earmarks of being totally politically motivated. It is disappointing that you found it convenient to express your personal political views in such a manner. What about Senator Obama's record of drug use? If you claim to be unbiased perhaps you should report on that.

Posted by CDC Don on 22 Sep 08 10:26 AM EDT
Let's look at this from the point of addiction vs from a political point. Cindy had a drug problem and sought help. An advocate in her position should be a powerful ally in our struggles with getting treatment more available to those in need. The doctor lost his license and Cindy went into treatment. Is this not a goal in addiction treatment? Help those suffering from the disease rather than putting them in jail?

Posted by genevieve on 22 Sep 08 09:12 AM EDT
I have to echo the opinions of several previous comments - this feels too politically charged to be included on Join Together's website - and I'm speaking as an Obama supporter.

Posted by tommy mac on 18 Sep 08 05:19 PM EDT
This article doesn't deserve a place on your forum-it's political not prevention oriented-please don't cheapen your product

Posted by Terrance Newton on 18 Sep 08 02:55 PM EDT
The person who seems to have an issue with; "the treatment industry" has got some axe to grind over God knows what. The Drug Czar of Michigan told the tale of $1.8 billion dollars being spent in all 50 States for the direct treatment of addiction. This was stated at the statewide substance misuse conference. This money is going to; "the treatment industry." Our state spends a whopping $2 billion dollars per year for the Department of Corrections. Considering there are 50 states in the United States which one is the bigger industry? Is the prison industry proving to be effective treatment to taxpayers who do not want to be taxed further?

Posted by Nancy G on 18 Sep 08 04:22 AM EDT
This article is not telling the whole story of what happened so it makes is real easy to pass judgement. Maybe we should be blessed with a President who buddies up with raticals that are a danger to our existance, get real people. This is pure political and is pathetic.

Posted by David/ Wisconsin on 17 Sep 08 04:28 PM EDT
How long do you think Obama's candidacy would last if this article had been about Michelle? Or if he had a pregnant 17 year old daughter?

Posted by Lisa on 17 Sep 08 02:18 PM EDT
Wake up people! Vote Republican in this election if you want to support and endorse the preferential treatment given to Cindy McCain, Rush Limbaugh and other wealthy, white Republicans. Why is the middle class in America so blind about the way Republicans have basically ruined our country and made us the laughingstock of the world?! With an economy in the tank, an expensive war (in which thousands of innocent people have died) dragging on without end, and example after example of one set of rules for the wealthy and another, more punitive set for the rest of us, what are people thinking when they support McCain/Palin????? (I'm a very angry, middle-aged white woman in Pittsburgh, PA)

Posted by Jerry, LCAS, CCS on 17 Sep 08 01:57 PM EDT
Or may Cindy did what a lot of us do. Take full responsibility for our behavior, understand the consequences of continuing the same behavior, and simply STOP. Does support "job security" for those in the "treatment industry" but it could save the nation a heck of a lot of money.

Posted by dd on 17 Sep 08 01:44 PM EDT
It's an important part of recovery to take responsibility for the harm caused by our addiction. That's pretty clear. What's often not so clear is exactly what our responsibility is and what to do about it. That's why AA asks us in the 5th step to consult our own conscience, our Higher Power and another person. How do we know that Cindy McCain hasn't already done this? Let's not play the blame game, but simply encourage one another to do the best we can with the help of God and other (hopefully loving) people.

Posted by Jerry, LCAS, CCS on 17 Sep 08 11:47 AM EDT
Hey Jennifer. Just like guns (guns don't kill people, people kill people), "alcohol don't (sic) kill people, people kill people". We've got to quit blaming inanimate objects,ie, alcohol,drugs,OR GUNS for 'people's' "bad CHOICES".

Posted by Lesli Messinger....Austin's Mom on 17 Sep 08 10:51 AM EDT
Maybe..just maybe, the McCain's understand the drug problem and would work towards "fixing" the system. I would love to have a dialogue with Cindy or her husband about this issue. In dealing with my son, I reacted as a parent of a son with a drug problem. Not as a parent of a son. There is a difference. Normal became blurred. I couldn't rely on my own instincts. Affordable inpatient facilities, therapy, drug information...all that has not been obtainable in the past to the average person that needs it. One of the reasons is, by the time you have an inkling that there is a serious problem, he or she is over 18, out of school and has no insurance. There simply is no help available for the child past that age. In addition to the lack of support, they are also over the age of consent, meaning, if they don't want help there is nothing you can do. Add the fact that they don't "see" a problem with their addiction. You are left with a hopeless situation while you stand helplessly as your son tells you..... "Don't worry, Mom. Rush Limbaugh does Oxys and it didn't hurt him." That is the last time I saw my sweet son alive. http://grief-journal.blogspot.com/

Posted by Jennifer on 17 Sep 08 10:39 AM EDT
Does anyone see the hypocrisy of someone being Chair of the Board of Anheuser-Busch,making enormous amounts of money from selling alcohol and then talking about recovery? My clients die, are incarcerated or impaired otherwise from alcohol related events daily, it is much larger problem than all the illegal drugs combine in my area.

Posted by Laurie Eccleston on 17 Sep 08 10:28 AM EDT
To Party of the Common Man, I am of that party, but I disagree with you. I have worked in the criminal justice system in many areas and I tend to see more poor minorities in diversion programs than white people. I am thankful that the nation is beginning to see the need for alternatives to incarceration!!!

Posted by Janet Williams on 17 Sep 08 10:24 AM EDT
Interesting that Cindy McCain says she will make this an issue she works on IF her husband is elected president. If not, then she is not so dedicated to raising awareness.

Posted by Becky on 17 Sep 08 10:20 AM EDT
ALL addicts display drug-seeking behavior as part of the disease. I'm unclear as to why it is Cindy's fault that the doctor chose to write false prescriptions. He obviously had strong codpendency issues and felt sorry for her. Both are responsible for their own behaviors. Both could have a powerful message to share NOW. If the media blames Cindy for the doctor's behavior, it is just blaming the victim of the disease for being sick. There always seems to be a need to blame someone, doesn't there? Typical addictive-system thinking.

Posted by Jerry, LCAS, CCS on 17 Sep 08 09:51 AM EDT
In response to the article as well as to "Party of the Common Man"; It appears to me that you don't have to be 'rich' 'white' or 'republican' to benefit the diseasing of our "mis"behaviors. If the diseasing of behavior continues to be advocated, the only consequence is "a slap on the wrist" if the reward is to spend time in a cozy tx. program, time after time, after time..... Whatever happened to having to accept responsibility for our behaviors (including, but not limited to, drugging and drinking behavior).

Posted by Leslie on 17 Sep 08 09:45 AM EDT
What I do not understand is John and Cindy know about addiction and both should look at the prison system and help find better ways then the lock-em-up mentality. Mandatory sentencing what a JOKE!!!! Most are there because of drug addiction and they sure did not get a deal like Cindy McCain and Rush Limbaugh.

Posted by Peter on 17 Sep 08 09:42 AM EDT
There needs to be a good poilcy point to an article like this - there could be one such as the power of a potential first lady to impact how the world feels about recovery - instead this came across as yet another story of the personal carnage from addiction - the opportunity for a powerful point was lost

Posted by John French on 17 Sep 08 08:50 AM EDT
Come on, JTG, it is mean spirited to publish this old news. There are other ways to make your point about addiction, although I am not sure what point about addiction you could claim to be making at this late date. You embarrass me. SHAME!

Posted by Robert on 17 Sep 08 08:45 AM EDT
Are you putting this in because it's political or to show that addiction can touch anyone? I sure hope that it's the later. The doctor should have lost his license. He knew what he was doing was wrong, not to say McCain didn't.

Posted by westy42 on 17 Sep 08 08:43 AM EDT
Where is character? Where is personal responsibility? Where is class? She should have kept that charity going with her own money - every penny if need be.

Posted by Party of the Common Man? on 16 Sep 08 12:21 PM EDT
It's good to be rich, white, and Republican. Cindy McCain, Rush Limbaugh, how many others have gotten off with a slap on the wrist for obtaining false prescriptions, when the poor, minority person would be sitting in a jail cell.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.