Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Canadian Poll Reflects Uncertainty About Safe-Injection Site
August 21, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

An opinion survey in Canada indicates public uncertainty about a controversial safe-injection facility in Vancouver, with 39 percent of individuals saying they were undecided about whether to support it, Canwest News Service reported Aug. 20.

In addition, although the facility provides clean needles for users to inject drugs under clinical supervision, one in five respondents to the Angus Reid opinion poll mistakenly said the program hands out heroin, cocaine and morphine to visitors.

The Insite safe-injection facility, which costs $2.5 million a year to operate, has come under harsh recent criticism from Federal Health Minister Tony Clement, who said it saves only one life a year. Clement, who criticized the facility during the International AIDS Conference in Mexico City, has called its presence "a surrender to a culture of disease and death" and believes its funding should support addiction treatment efforts instead.

The poll of 1,005 Canadians, taken from. Aug. 15-18, found that 38 percent of residents support the safe-injection facility and 23 percent are opposed. Support was seen as strongest in British Columbia, where the facility is located, and in Alberta.

The facility's sponsoring health authority, Vancouver Coastal Health, says the Insite program refers hundreds of drug users to treatment each year, stating that visitors to the program are more likely than other injection drug users to make the decision to enter treatment.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by SisterCrystal on 27 Aug 08 09:02 PM EDT
As a recovering addict from Victoria (just across the water from Vancouver)I would like to register my support for the continuation and expansion of this program. To abandon the program would be to 'surrender to a culture of disease and death' - the culture created by prohibition. There is no empirical evidence to support Tony's statement, and plenty to refute it. I can only conclude that Tony Clement is either ignorant or incompetent, and either way unsuited for his position.

Posted by Karey Materi on 23 Sep 08 04:30 PM EDT
When i just read what Tony Clement just stated that:"it only saves one life year", well that should end it right there. Opening a safe injection site promotes illegal drug use. What r we going to say to our children? What's that place over there mom? oh that's a place where addicts can go and get high on illegal substances, and the Canadian government allows it. there r healthcare services out there, there are methadone clinics out there, but these addicts just want to keep doing drugs, and now we are giving them a place to do drugs, are we going to be supplying the heroin next? Safe injection is so very wrong, how can those nurses who watch the addict who inject the heroin know if its a strong powerful heroin, or if its cut. I just heard that only %5 of the addicts out in vancouver where the site is use it, its just so wrong, and having a judge to be able to make this law is just wrong, it should be up to Stephen Harper, he dead set against it, and so am i.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines