Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Board Doesn't Consider Autopsy in Ruling on Firefighters' Death
February 25, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Alcohol and other drugs did not contribute to the deaths of two Boston firefighters last year, according to a review panel made up of other firefighters. But the panel never reviewed autopsy results that showed that one of the dead firemen had a blood-alcohol level three times the legal limit when he died, while the other had traces of cocaine in his system.

The Associated Press reported Feb. 23 that the 134-page report from the Boston Fire Department's board of inquiry concluded from interviews that the two firefighters, who died fighting a fire at a restaurant, were not impaired on the job.

"The facts show they performed their duties as they were assigned to them," said Division Chief Stephen Dunbar, a member of the review board.

Dunbar said the panel asked the city of Boston for copies of the autopsy reports but never received them.

Boston Fire Commissioner Roderick Fraser called the report incomplete. "I don't believe you can report out completely what happened without the toxicology and autopsy reports," he said.

Following the tragedy, Boston Mayor Thomas Menino has called for random alcohol and other drug testing of city firefighters. The review board's report recommended establishing a drug-testing program, but did not endorse random testing.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Shattah206 on 26 Feb 08 03:01 PM EST
As long as lawmakers, from local pols up to the feds, are cowed by firefighters' unions, there will be no effective drug/alcohol testing.

Posted by Frrank Winkler on 26 Feb 08 12:21 PM EST
Sounds like a classic case of the fox ruling the roost in the hen house. Certainly no objective investigative report decision can be rendered by an authoritative review committee in a case like this involving fatalities without review of autopsy and toxiciology results. A BAC three times the legal limit is at least presumptive prima facie evidence of impairment. Just try to enteer a similar finding in a DUI homocide with similar BAC evidence re the charged driver. It is certainly understandable, as well, that fellow fire fighters would be sympathetic to their fallen comrades, especially if an adverse finding by the reivew committee might jeopardize benefits to survivors, etc. (as in a finding of "not in the line of duty" due to alcohol and/ or drug impairment, which might result in a regulatory requirement to deny benefits.) All the more reason outside objective review and evaluation should be mandatory in such cases.The mayor's recommendations are at best tepid and lack any serious commitment to make any substantive changes-- it's obviously business as usual in the fine old city of Boston. And that won't change without higher level intervention and "mad as hell" citizen mandates at the polls next go-round.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.