Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Some Anesthesiologists Subjected to Drug Tests
November 19, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Massachusetts General Hospital and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation have started random urine drug testing in anesthesia residency teaching departments, doing battle with an addiction problem that has long plagued a profession with easy access to powerful drugs, ABC News reported Nov. 12.

Doctors in favor of drug testing argue that early detection and deterrents can significantly decrease the impact of addiction among anesthesiologists. Michael Fitzsimons, administrator for the substance abuse program of the department of anesthesia and critical care at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, estimates that treatment and rehabilitation costs alone may reach $100,000 per doctor, without even accounting for time spent out of work.

Obstacles to implementing a drug-testing program for anesthesiologists include the expense associated with testing, the ability of doctors to mask their drug use or manipulate test results, and the impression that the tests are demeaning. But Fitzsimmons reports few problems with the Mass General program.

Anesthesiologists are at highest risk of addiction during residency, according to Gregory Collins, section head of the Alcohol and Drug Recovery Center, at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, when they are in a high-stress environment and have seen the powerful effects of drugs, but do not have a lot of experience.

"These kids think they can manage this, that they know how to use the drugs. They'll take that risk and do it," said Collins. "They think they'll just take a little bit and be done, but it really doesn't work that way."

According a survey conducted by the Cleveland Clinic, 80 percent of anesthesiology residency training programs report difficulties with drug-impaired doctors, with 19 percent reporting an overdose death.

Arnold Berry, an anesthesiologist and member of the Committee on Occupational Health of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, estimated that one to two percent of anesthesiologists are addicted to medication. "The most recent study in training programs suggests the (addiction) rate has stayed the same for 20 years," he said.

"The problem is that we are exposed to, and we have the use of, very highly addictive and potent medications," said Fitzsimons. The drugs fentanyl, which is 1,000 times stronger than morphine, and sufentanyl, which is 1,000 times stronger than fentanyl, are often misused, according to Collins.

"Although the percentages are not high, when you do have a case, often you discover it when they're dead. The first thing you often realize in these cases, it's a kid dead in the bathroom with a needle in his arm," said Collins.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by POAndrea on 24 Nov 08 02:08 PM EST
We test bus drivers, police officers, railroad conductors, nuclear-plant engineers, and schoolteachers because we believe that we are safer when these people remain drug-free. Why not doctors, especially anesthesiologists, whose ineractions with us occur at the times of our lives when we are the most reliant on their care and vulnerable to their mistakes?

Posted by Ruth on 24 Nov 08 01:01 PM EST
My understanding is that many anesthesiologists who become addicted to pain killers have become so not due to their personal predilections, but rather their repeated and daily exposure to vaporic release of anesthesia through the mouth of the patient while giving treatment. The anesthesiologist is very close to the person and therefore become exposed and addicted without knowing even why.

Posted by MAMAorg on 20 Nov 08 11:14 PM EST
Methadone may be legal but addiction is still addiction and does not make it OK to consume and then go on about your daily life if it means you are responsible for someone's life. Mothers Against Medical Abuse. Org

Posted by MAMAorg on 20 Nov 08 11:10 PM EST
Why not make mandatory drug testing for all doctors and medical staff that have direct patient care. Studies show that doctors and nurses can attend a methadone program to treat their addiction then go on to work. Possibly taking care of you or your loved one.

Posted by caj on 20 Nov 08 08:09 PM EST
Yes, DDB is right on a number of points. The sample should not be altered, so that leaves out onsite urine. Oral fluid is not "the end all/do all" of drug testing, but in THIS circumstance, with savvy donors, it is the matrix that can least likely be altered. The temptation is to say it can't be, but eventually there will be something. In the meantime, good collection standards will alleviate adulteration in oral fluid. Wish the same could be said of urine.

Posted by DDB on 20 Nov 08 04:02 PM EST
I believe that MGH has every right to drug test it's students. I also believe that random drug testing should be mandatory. But it needs to be a method that cannot be altered. When all of the facts are in, it comes down to one thing. To save a life.

Posted by DDB on 20 Nov 08 03:58 PM EST
Not only do I think MGH has a right to do drug testing, I think random testing should be mandatory. The subject of to test or not to test comes down to one simple thing. To save a life or not to save a life.

Posted by caj on 20 Nov 08 02:03 PM EST
First, are these residents burdened with 16-24+ hr shifts, trying to hang on in these archaic working conditions, or are these irresponsible doctors just pursuing recreation? Secondly, why not move to oral fluid testing- it has a flexible window of detection, based on how often drug is used (longer for frequent use), it is an observed collection, and shows predominantly parent drug.(vs. metabolite) The results are virtually impossible to alter if the collection is conducted properly in a proven collection device, and the screened sample can be easily validated in a certified laboratory by either GC or LC. (Obviously onsite oral fluid technology isn't able to detect the low levels of drug in oral fluid consistently or well, which is critical in this setting)

Posted by Robin C. -Augusta on 20 Nov 08 12:28 PM EST
That 1-2%addiction rate is just the ones that they know about. Believe me, it's probably more along the lines of 60% or maybe more. This kind of addiction can be disguised, sometimes for a while, without anyone knowing anything. I'm not sure that there is a right answer, but it seems to me that a tighter inventory control of the anesthesia drugs and better accountability to another MD would help more. Or what about Hair tests? You can't "fix" them to be clean and it reveals a three month pattern. One random hair follicle test and you could have enough evidnece to put someone in treatment. And Addicts are sometimes very subconsciously driven to professions with easy drug access. The bottom line is: anesthesiology is not for everyone. This is just such a complex issue and so really all we can do is try to prevent it in the first place. Better education about addiction, better drug control, accountability to other peers and a standard monitoring system are, I think, some of the answers. Unfortunately, even with those things in place, we can't save everyone. Continue to be proactive about addiction education.

Posted by Bruce R. Talbot on 20 Nov 08 10:25 AM EST
Couldn;t the same arguement be made to support random student drug testing in high schools? ". . . early detection and deterrents can significantly decrease the impact of addiction. . ."

Posted by Sean A @ Stonehill College on 19 Nov 08 07:01 PM EST
I agree that there should be drug testing in hospitals for two reasons. The first is that people employed in clinical positions, especially positions that involve decision making regarding patients, are responsible for the lives of others. Doctors have access to drugs and are usually under stress so it seems logical some may turn to drug abuse to alleviate some of that stress. Patient care should be the first priority of a hospital and maintaining a drug free work place is important to prevent mistakes by impaired physicians. The second reason I think the drug testing is a good idea is that finding out about a drug addiction early would result in more effective treatment. The longer a drug addiction is left untreated the worse it becomes. I think MGH is right to test some of it’s clinical staff.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.