Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Alaska Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Recriminalizing Marijuana
March 24, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

An attempt to roll back Alaska's long-standing policy of marijuana decriminalization has reached the state's Supreme Court, the Anchorage Daily News reported March 21.

The Alaska Supreme Court ruled in 1975 that possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use was legal under the state constitution and its privacy protections. At the time, the court said the state had failed to prove that personal use of marijuana threatened public health.

Two years ago, however, the state legislature passed a law recriminalizing personal at-home use of marijuana. The law was struck down by a lower court, which cited the 1975 ruling, but that decision was appealed to the Supreme Court by the Alaskan state government.

Alaska special assistant attorney general Dean Guaneli argued that the state now has more evidence on the dangers of marijuana than it did in 1975. "It's a different kind of drug, it's a different era and the Legislature considered all that and reached its decision," said Guaneli, who said that marijuana is now more potent.

But American Civil Liberties Union of Alaska staff attorney Adam Wolf said, "Nothing relevant has changed since 1975."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Sarah Dean on 15 Oct 08 11:06 PM EDT
Marijuana doesn't ruin lives...People ruin their own lives. People constantly drink and drive and destroy others or even their lives. People who smoke do it in the comfort of their homes. If they decide to sell the substance, punish them. If an individual smokes marijauna on jobsite, instant termination. There's so much more.

Posted by Julia Carter on 09 Sep 08 11:08 PM EDT
Lots of things we do endanger public health. Driving our cars pollutes the air we breathe and contributes to global warming, but we don't make that illegal. There are many addictions as well. People get addicted to shopping, eating sweets, greasy food, the internet, you name it. But none of those things are illegal. Adult use of the herb marijuana is none of the government's business! Laws against it violate our Constitutional rights.

Posted by Jake on 22 May 08 03:56 AM EDT
We shall ignore the lessons of the 1920s prohibition and the rise of Al Capone and others at our own peril. Why is it that the Netherlands has a lower rate of marijuana use than the US? No one supports the drug war more than the drug dealer. If your goal is to support organized crime, create an untaxable black market, burden non-violent young people with felony records to be sent to the University of Crime (prison), and foster a lack of respect for the rule of law, go ahead and support "tough on crime" prohibition. Otherwise, we should regulate the substances, tax them, and use that funding to provide education, rehab, and job training.

Posted by gene taylor on 25 Mar 08 10:47 PM EDT
I am also an addictions counselor, for over 30 years. I talk to college students who see no problem with abusing alcohol but who don't use marijuana because of its legal status. Somehow the adolescent mind sees a difference between an illegal substance and drinking illegally (underage.) I see few predictions about the change of patterns that would occur when decriminalization would occur in a large state, such as New York or Pennsylvania. I doubt that controlling the sales to those over 21 will keep it away from our youth where it probably creates the most harm, in the developing brain.

Posted by Betty Fulks on 25 Mar 08 08:45 AM EDT
The attorney General Dean Guaneli is correct in stating that marijuana is now more potent. There are 421 chemicals in marijuana. I have counseled many addicts and marijuana is ruining lives. John Doheny is also correct in stating that monies are better spent on education, prevention, and treatment not legalizing a drug that is harmful.

Posted by John Doheny on 24 Mar 08 06:55 PM EDT
I am an addiction counselor and am also in recovery, have been for 28 years. I am very disappointed to hear this news. Criminalizing drugs is not the solution. Use the funding for criminal interventions to provide treatment interventions instead. The legal "war on drugs" is a miserable failure and only serves to provide lots of money for those perpetuating the war. The money would be better spent on education, prevention and treatment.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.