Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

$1.8 Billion in Tobacco Control Saves Calif. $86 Billion, Study Says
September 2, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

California spent $1.8 billion on statewide tobacco-control during the program's first 15 years but saved $86 billion in personal healthcare costs during the same timespan, according to a study from the University of California at San Francisco.

Consumer Affairs reported Aug. 29 that the study on the cost benefits of the California Tobacco Control Program estimated that the program prevented the consumption of 3.6 billion packs of cigarettes -- worth $9.2 billion -- in its first decade and a half. The return on investment in the program was 50-to-1, researchers said.

"The benefits of the program accrued very quickly and are very large," said Stanton Glantz, Ph.D., director of the UCSF Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. "When adults stop smoking, you see immediate benefits in heart disease, with impacts on cancer and lung diseases starting to appear a year or two later."

Unlike many other prevention programs, California's tobacco-control initiative focused on changing social norm for adult smokers, not adolescents. Massive cost savings were seen even though funding for the program was trimmed in the mid-1990s. Researchers said that if funding had been sustained throughout the study period the state would have saved $156 billion.

The research was published in the Aug. 25, 2008 issue of the journal PLoS Medicine.
 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by tokerdesigner on 04 Sep 08 04:10 PM EDT
Your report mentions that California "spent" $1.8 billion preventing the consumption of $9.2 billion worth of cigarets-- is that $1.8 bil. the amount of cigaret tax revenue the state gave up, or some other anti-smoking spending? How about the taxes the fed, counties and municipalities would have raked in on those unsold cigarets? Remember the 1998 Clinton-Gore settlement, $200 bil. that was supposed to be used in stop-smoking programs? The politicians in each state quickly diverted the money to schools, roads, etc., a convenient way to keep tax rates low and get reelected. Now if cannabis is legalized (saving "law-enforcement" money) and activists convert millions of cigaret smokers to vaporizer, e-cigaret, single-toke utensils and other harm-reduction devices now risky to own because someone will accuse you of illegal cannabis use, won't that cause an even bigger drop in health costs (i.e. money earned by Big Pharma treating avoidable cigaret diseases such as high blood pressure)? As of May 2008 the Presidential candidate who had got the most Big Tobackgo donations was Giuliani-- the one most notorious for anti-marijuana law enforcement (in the '90's). Go figure.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.