Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Tobacco Industry Lobbies to Keep Cheap Cigarettes Flowing to Soldiers
February 14, 2007

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The U.S. military wanted to raise the price of cigarettes sold in commissaries, but the tobacco industry used its influence with Congress and the military supply system to keep prices low, according to a researcher from the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF).

Ruth Malone, RN, Ph.D., a professor of nursing and health policy at the UCSF School of Nursing's Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, said that the tobacco industry has helped reinforce the notion that smoking is a "right" for members of the military. The industry successfully blocked a price increase in commissaries for more than a decade until a modest increase was implemented in 1996, she said.

Tobacco companies argued that cheap cigarettes were a "benefit" to soldiers that should not be restricted.

A report from the U.S. Inspector General found that tobacco use costs the military eight times more than it earns on tobacco sales, including healthcare costs. Smoking also has a negative effect on military readiness, experts say.

"A new generation of American troops will no doubt become addicted to cigarettes because of shortsighted policies that continue to subsidize low cost tobacco in military stores," said Malone. "It is past time for Congress and the Department of Defense to quit doing the work of the tobacco industry at taxpayer expense."

"A larger question is why, even today, cigarettes are still being sold through military outlets when it has long been clear that tobacco use harms the readiness of troops," added Malone.

The research appears in the February 2007 issue of the journal Tobacco Control

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.