Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Study Finds Rich Kids More Likely to Use Drugs Than Poor
February 20, 2007

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Rich kids from Alameda and Contra Costa counties in California were more likely to use alcohol and other drugs than their peers from poor communities, according to data from California's Healthy Kids Survey.

The Contra Costa Times reported Feb. 19 that disposable income, disconnected families, and pressure to succeed all contribute to drug use among upscale youth, adding that parents in these communities add to the problem by denying that it occurs. "Perfection is very, very valued in affluent communities," noted Madeline Levine, author of "The Price of Privilege."

More affluent kids also can afford to buy fake IDs and can drive to places where they can pay someone to buy alcohol for them, experts note.

Binge drinking and past-month alcohol use among high-school juniors were more prevalent in richer areas of the East Bay than in less-affluent areas, according to the survey, and more juniors from rich towns admitted to having gotten high on drugs. "You can make some general assessments that affluent areas have higher alcohol and marijuana use," said Sean Slade, regional manager for the California Healthy Kids Survey.

Kids in affluent areas have lower alcohol and other drug use rates in the lower grades, but often catch up or surpass drug-use rates among poorer youth when they reach high school.

Some upscale communities have turned to "social host" laws to counter permissive attitudes among parents, some of whom believe it is better to allow their children to drink at home with friends than to go out and do it.  

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Hiawatha N. Bouldin, CPS on 10 Mar 08 11:30 AM EDT
Regardless of the propensity to use these substances (especially alcohol/tobacco), we can do a better job of controlling access by mobilizing communities to limit plcaes that sell alcohol and tobacco, starting with the lower income areas where we know (1) We have greater density of stores and (2) we know our affluent youth travel there to purchase. We can also increase our enforcment of present laws that limit access (eg; Age limits). If we become more aggressive on store that sell to minors we lessen the sales. Just a suggestion, but we might look at limiting sales of tobacco & alcohol to locations that restrict minors from entering. Initial costs yes, but long term benefits will prevail. Unless of course we really don't want to stop the problem we all know exist.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines