Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Report Blasts Calif. Prison Officials for $1-Billion Treatment 'Waste'
February 23, 2007

Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has squandered $1 billion on ineffective drug treatment programs that have done nothing to reduce recidivism, the state's inspector general said in a scathing new report, "Special Review Into In-Prison Substance Abuse Programs Managed by the Ca. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation" (PDF).

The Los Angeles Times reported Feb. 22 that Inspector General Matt Cate said that while successful treatment programs have the potential to "change lives and help relieve the state's prison overcrowding crisis," state corrections officials have "squandered that opportunity" by failing to manage programs properly and investing in in-prison programs where participants were destined to fail.

Cate called spending on in-prison treatment since 1989 "a complete waste of money," and said prison officials kept expanding programs even though more than 20 reports said that the programs were failing.

Reacting to the report, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger named California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs director Kathryn Jett to oversee a shakeup of the prison treatment program. Cate said that Jett's appointment was the right move, while Jett called the inspector general's report "an excellent blueprint for change."

California spends $143 million a year on addiction treatment for inmates, including on 38 privately operated programs in 22 prisons. Among the problems cited by Cate were that prisons rarely followed the therapeutic-community guidelines of separating treatment participants from the general prison population, that frequent prison lockdowns often disrupt treatment, and that group counseling programs put too many inmates with each counselor.

Cate added that the corrections department repeatedly funded studies of the programs but never took corrective action based on the reports' findings.

"Saying it's a billion-dollar failure is really a mischaracterization of what's happened, because there have been some very successful programs that have delivered amazing reductions in recidivism," said Rod Mullen, chief executive officer of Amity Foundation, which runs some of California's in-prison treatment programs. However, Mullen agreed with the report's contention that lack of followup care hurt treatment effectiveness. "That's the key, and we've known that for 10 or 15 years," he said. "What's been missing is a commitment by the department, the Legislature and the governor to make sure it happens." 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Rick ET on 27 May 08 01:01 PM EDT
What does follow up care mean? A state funded place for the prisoner to live after incarceration? More continuing care meetings or groups? When looking at the report and seeing that funds were shifted from one area to another I get the feeling that struggling counselors who were underpaid to begin with had what few resources were available taken from them by administrators who did little to support or upgrade their skills. GOSH! I don't understand why things went wrong!

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for everyone, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, focused, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post personal requests for help or general promotions for your organization (Get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.