Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Renewed Call for Drug Testing After Boston Firefighter Fatalities
October 9, 2007

Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Two Boston firefighters were under the influence of alcohol and cocaine, respectively, when they died in a recent fire, and the autopsy results have helped renew calls for mandatory random drug testing, the New York Times reported Oct. 6.

Firefighter Paul J. Cahill, 55, had a high level of alcohol in his body when he died in an August fire at a Chinese restaurant, while the autopsy of fellow firefighter Warren J. Payne found traces of cocaine. Boston remains in the minority of big cities that don't require random drug testing of firefighters, although a 1999 independent report recommended that drug testing be expanded beyond "for-cause" screening.

Opposition from the Boston firefighters' union has scuttled past attempts to implement random drug tests, but the issue is likely to be part of the latest collective-bargaining discussions between the union and the city.

Cahill had a suspended driver's license stemming from an incident where he was pulled over for suspected drunk driving and refused a breath test. A Boston Fire Department spokesperson said that all firefighters are supposed to show supervisors a valid license each month to stay on the job, but that Cahill apparently did not do so.

Spokesperson Scott Salman said the department's investigation into the fire that killed Cahill and Payne will include whether anyone saw Cahill drunk and whether his condition or Payne's was a factor in the tragedy.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by scott on 13 May 08 12:56 AM EDT
so what if someone who pulls a child from a burning house wants to relax and calm thier nerves at the end of a long shift. im sure there are ways of finding out someone is under the influence during work hours. maybe that should be the more practical and fair focus.thier lives are on the line , get off thier backs.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES:
Comments are meant for thoughtful public discussion of the article published above. Therefore:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, focused, and on-topic.

  2. Do not post personal requests for help (see resources).

  3. Proof your comments carefully for spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

  4. Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated comments are prohibited.

We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.