Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Questions Grow About Medical Marijuana, Workplace
April 20, 2007

Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

With a dozen states now allowing the use of marijuana for medical purposes, employers are experiencing more conflicts between medical users and workplace drug-testing policies, USA Today reported April 17.

Some employers are sticking to "zero-tolerance" policies that call for firing any worker who tests positive for marijuana, including Columbia Forest Products. Others, like Newbridge Securities, even allow medical marijuana users to use the drug at work. Meanwhile, the courts have become involved in deciding whether medical-use laws provide any protection to workers.

"The rights of an employer to ensure productivity and safety around machinery and on the job has to take precedence," says Mark Levitt, a labor and employment lawyer in Tampa, Fla. "The use of marijuana has an effect on employees' ability to perform. That's a big concern for employers."

But Melek Pulatkonak, president and CEO of the Internet search-engine company Hakia, said that while his company would have "to be sure their mind is clear," officials would consider a flexible work schedule for an employee who uses medical marijuana.

No state medical-marijuana laws require employers to make such accommodations for medical users. But companies remain far from certain about how firm their legal ground is in firing medical-marijuana users who fail drug tests.

"It's almost an untenable situation. Employers are screaming for answers," said employment lawyer Richard Meneghello. "We know they're looking for clear answers, and there's not one out there right now. There's a lot of uncertainty. Employers are living in a dangerous situation."

The Oregon Supreme Court ruled last year that Columbia Forest Products did not have to accommodate a medical-marijuana user who failed a workplace drug test, despite arguments that the worker was never impaired on the job. The company said it had to maintain a drug-free workplace for safety reasons and because it is a government contractor. 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Your Turn! Post a public comment (guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word: Change

GUIDELINES:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, non-commercial, and on-topic.

  2. Please do not post personal requests for help or personal contact information (Click here for help resources).

  3. Proof your comments carefully. They are published immediately and cannot be edited by you or by us.

  4. Making your post readable with careful spelling and punctuation will strengthen your point.  Don't use ALL CAPS.

We reserve the right to remove comments that do not conform to these guidelines (Report an inappropriate comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.