Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Ore. Bill Would Allow Employers to Fire Medical-Marijuana Users
February 9, 2007

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Use of marijuana for medical reasons may be legal under Oregon state law, but a state lawmaker says employers should still be allowed to fire workers for testing positive for marijuana on drug tests even if they are medical users.

The Associated Press reported Feb. 8 that the bill would allow workers to be fired for positive drug tests arising from off-premises drug use as well as for marijuana use or impairment on the job. "I spent 20 years as a professional, commercial helicopter pilot," said Sen. Betsy Johnson (D-Scappoose). "It is a zero-tolerance-for-drugs industry ... to assure a safe operation in the kind of very dangerous work that we were doing."

Opponents said the measure would legalize discrimination against medical-marijuana users, who may have detectable amounts of the drug in their bodies even a month after use. "It presumes that everyone who is using medical marijuana is impaired while at the same time individuals using other medications are not," said Andrea Meyer of the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon.

Sen. Floyd Prozanski (D-Eugene) said employers should rely on obvious signs of impairment, not drug tests, to initiate punitive job actions. That argument didn't sit well with J.L. Wilson, the Oregon director of the National Federation of Independent Business. "There's a whole host of plaintiff's attorneys looking for business, and this is another avenue for them if you have impaired workers," Wilson said.

Last year, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that Columbia Forest Products was within its rights to fire millwright and medical-marijuana user Robert Washburn after a positive drug test.
 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by AndrewK@Stonehill on 13 Nov 08 06:07 PM EST
I think that employers should have the right to fire an employee that tests positive for marijuana, regardless of whether or not they are a medicinal marijuana user. I'm not saying that they should fire the employee, just that they should be reserved the right to. If a person is not allowed to be in a work place if they have been using drugs, why should they suddenly be allowed simply because a doctor said so. The employee's drug use could endanger not only themselves, but also everyone around them in the workplace. I would not want a pilot of an airliner to be allowed to fly me across the country after testing positive for marijuana use, regardless of whether the marijuana was for medicinal purposes or not. Granted, not all jobs involve risks like flying an airplane, but not all jobs require drug tests, and these are the jobs that an employee should be evaluated based solely on their performance.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.