Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Nicotine Study Could Provide Push for FDA Regulation of Tobacco
January 19, 2007

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

A bill to give the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the power to regulate tobacco -- already a top priority in the new Democratic Congress -- could get an added boost from a new Harvard School of Public Health study showing that tobacco companies have steadily raised the amount of addictive nicotine in cigarettes.

The New York Times reported Jan. 19 that backers of increased federal regulation say that the Harvard report shows why such oversight is needed. "Given the harm that tobacco causes, it shouldn't be a game of cat-and-mouse to figure out what the industry is doing to cigarettes," said Josh Sharfstein, commissioner of health in Baltimore, Md.

Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), the lead sponsor of the FDA bill, said the study is "dramatic new proof that Big Tobacco is addicted to addicting millions of young smokers."

Ironically, Philip Morris has criticized the Harvard study -- saying changes in nicotine level are random -- but supports FDA regulation.

Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler said that tobacco firms have a long history of manipulating nicotine levels in cigarettes. "Tobacco makers still have not answered some fundamental questions about why this is happening," said Kessler, currently dean of the school of medicine at the University of California at San Francisco.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.