Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Lowering Drinking Age to 18 Gets Consideration
August 15, 2007

Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Several states, including Florida, Wisconsin, Vermont and Missouri, have studied the idea of lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18, as some experts are suggesting, MSNBC reported Aug. 14.

The National Youth Rights Association has launched a petition drive to lower the drinking age, and some Missouri advocates are organizing a ballot initiative. John McCardell, former president of Middlebury College in Vermont, has become the most visible advocate for the change.

“The law was changed in 1984, and the law had a very specific purpose, and that was to prohibit drinking among those under the age of 21,” McCardell said. “The only way to measure the success of that law is to ask ourselves whether, 23 years later, those under 21 are not drinking.” “The evidence is very clear,” McCardell said. “It has had no effect.”

Backers believe the rise of binge drinking among adolescents and college students can be directly traced to raising the drinking age to 21. “Just like during national Prohibition, the law has pushed and forced underage drinking and youthful drinking underground, where we have no control over it," said David J. Hanson, an alcohol policy expert at the State University of New York-Potsdam. 

Opposition to the proposal remains strong, however. “Why would we repeal or weaken laws that save lives? It doesn’t make sense," said Mark Rosenker, chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board. The age-21 laws adopted by all 50 states -- under threat by Congress of losing their federal highway funds -- have been credited with lowering the rate of drunk-driving fatalities. But critics also question the studies used to link the age-21 law and lower alcohol-related traffic fatalities.

McCardell's group, Choose Responsibility, would like to see the drinking age lowered to 18 but also wants  "drinking licenses" issued to those ages 18 to 21. McCardell also wants youths to receive more education on responsible alcohol consumption.

However, 77 percent of Americans recently surveyed by Gallup said they opposed lowering the drinking age. 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by xavier on 03 Oct 08 10:27 AM EDT
yea like i agree with wat every on is saying here i read every last one of them and it got me thinking like we could surly die fot or country be arrested at the age of 13 and be put in jail for a couple of hours y cant we drimk at hte age of 18 we seem to get to do wat ever like we can buy cigereets at a gastation y cant we buy beer its does the same harm as alchol does all i am really sayuin is that if we could but one thing that could kill us why cant we buy beer

Posted by Laurie on 24 Sep 08 04:34 PM EDT
Lowerig the drinking age could help in so many ways. If someone wants to drink they will, and it just causes more time and money putting them behind bars, when we should be focusing on more important finacial battles and serious issues. As far as the war statement, any of you that say you can't compare the two are WRONG. War is much more dangerous, we just don't hear all the details from the news about the battles, but if you really think about it war is much more dangerous then having a drink or two. Alcohol is abused at any age, so if it is to be banned it should be from anyone, not just discriminating teens about it. And as far as MADD goes, of course drinking and driving is bad, but teens are NOT the only ones that do so. It is illegal to drive drunk at ANY age, so that shouldn't even be brought up. Its all about discrimination, porn and smoking are looked at as "bad" and yet at 18 we can do that too!

Posted by Ronnie on 18 Sep 08 10:05 PM EDT
OK, so kids under 21 drink more often, because its "being bad" or " a step away from whats right" so they feel cool..if it were allowed kids underage would in time learn responsible drinking, because it would just be something else you could do and it wouldnt be as big of a deal. Sure at first the rates might go up, but in time they would go back down. And besides if yo can sign official documents, buy cigarettes ( which by the way kill more epople than ANY drinking related death), serve your country, and if you ALLOWED to drink on Naval Ships ( which is a government organization ) than you cant really argue with the point that the drinking age should be lowered, UNLESS you want to change all thos eother laws to 21 which then would slammmm the economy forr sure, but you can decide

Posted by ALMA on 25 Aug 08 10:04 PM EDT
Yes, if we can die for this country then why can't eighteen year olds drink? Its plain simple because dieing for you country is honor, courage and commitment as of for drinking its not important. These soldiers are making a difference in our lives everyday and alcohol doesn't.

Posted by Sarah on 20 Aug 08 05:52 PM EDT
I think the drinking age should be 18. If we can die for our country we should be able to have a beer. When your 18 your considered an ADULT. End of story

Posted by anon on 10 Aug 08 07:51 PM EDT
A popular reason for kids under 21 to drink is because they aren't allowed to. Going against the laws and being "rebellious" and getting away with it gives them a sense of pride, something they can boast about to friends. If they age was lowered to 18, there would be less drinking for rebellious purposes, seeing as it wouldn't have the same appeal as before. At the age of 18, you should be able to make responsible decisions for yourself. Along with the other privilages awarded when you turn 18, drinking should be amongst one of them. Curfews are always a great idea as well. If people are concerned about younger people out on the roads at weird hours, set a city-wide curfew for those under 21. I believe lowering the drinking age to 18 will be one way to cut back on binge drinking and the like. People need to keep an open mind when this type of action is proposed and weigh both sides of the idea before making a decision.

Posted by Alcohol Educator on 01 Jul 08 01:43 PM EDT
So now what-more ineffective legislation? Anyone with any common sense can see that the only way any real change is going to happen is through a well balanced combination of ADEQUATE education & INTELLEGENT legislation. Education for our youth as well as parents, educators, liquor license holders & legislators. Everyone needs to be on the same page when it comes to understanding alcohol & its effects on the human body. Then we might possibly be able to come up with a solution to the underage and DUI problems in our society. Let’s stop blaming the alcohol industry & put the blame on society in general. Look at what is acceptable for our youth today. The way we dress, the way we have taken God out of everything, the way we have allowed sexuality into every aspect of society, what is acceptable on TV & in movies, etc. If we want to blame alcohol advertising for youth drinking then let’s also blame youth pregnancies on the sexuality we see in the media or auto ads for youth speeding & underage driving which also kills our youth, or sports figures for making breaking the law cool, etc. Face it, society as a whole is responsible for these types of problems.

Posted by Alcohol Educator on 01 Jul 08 01:08 PM EDT
The 18/21 debate is an ongoing, never ending debate that I truly believe will never be settled especially with the way current statistics are collected and represented. It honestly depends on the group interpreting & presenting the results of surveys and polls as to how they are represented. Maybe we should all put aside the "statistics" and use some common sense and parental instincts to deal with the underage drinking situation. Has rising the drinking age lowered traffic fatality stats - maybe? However, has it increased deaths caused by so called "binge drinking" (that definition is ridiculous as it stands-what about a time frame, what about a 6’2” man vs a 5’2” woman, etc.) & underground excessive drinking - absolutely. We are just changing one problem for another. Continued...

Posted by Get a Brain on 28 Jun 08 07:37 PM EDT
I would just like to mention my disdain and offense I take from being referred to as a "minor" in regards to alcohol. I thought I was no longer a "minor" when I turned 18? Am I suddenly considered a child when it comes to booze? WTF. The lawmakers need to do some growing up. I take it as a direct insult being treated like a kid in a toxic candy store. I feel discriminated against and I will not tolerate discrimination.

Posted by Get a Clue on 08 Jun 08 11:20 PM EDT
Honestly. Do you really think that having the drinking age raised to 21 has done any good? Well the answer is absolutely not. Now more than ever young adults are getting MIPs that you see regularly in the paper. Compared to before the law was issued. This is most likely because when you tell somebody they cannot do something the first thing they try to do is what you told them not to. If you look at other countries who have quite young drinking ages you will see that they have very little drinking problems. This is due to the fact that getting caught drinking and driving is like nearly killing somebody. This is what the United States needs to do. They need to set steeper penalties for those who are caught disobeying the law.

Posted by Carol on 28 May 08 03:08 PM EDT
Frankly, I think we expect way too much from someone with limited life experiences at age 18. Using the excuse that if we can send them off to war we should allow them to drink just doesn't equate. The military spends lots of time and energy preparing someone for battle. What do we do to help the young learn how to drink??? Just tell them "know when to say when". What kind of training is that? If you want to change the laws then rethink the attitudes that accept high-risk drinking among our youth because we're dealing with a drug that impairs the ability to "know".

Posted by jw on 23 May 08 11:28 PM EDT
"How can anyone equate military service with a health risk?"...later in post "Life experience and maturity are in short supply for the average 18 year old" I don't mean to go at any specific person, but I can't imagine going up to an 18 year old in our armed forces and telling them that are in short supply on maturity. I don't imagine the poster meant it that way, but it sounds quite awful in my opinion. There is more maturity needed for the men and women in our armed forces than any other job in our country.

Posted by hunter on 23 May 08 04:50 PM EDT
the drinking age should be lowered if your old enough to join the amry and vote u should be able to drink

Posted by charli on 25 Apr 08 12:37 PM EDT
i think the drinking age should be lowered because the kids could still get there education they need. we can vote and go to the arm but we cant drink?

Posted by charli on 25 Apr 08 12:33 PM EDT
i think that if we can vote and smoke and gamble on tickets and other things but we cant drink a beer.i think that the age limmit of drinking should be lowerd. the kids will still get there education cause you can put rules or ground them. There should be a curfue for them to be inside.

Posted by Karen on 22 Apr 08 10:43 AM EDT
John McCardell, former president of Middlebury College in Vermont is embarrassingly incorrect in his assertion that raising the drinking age to 21 had no effect. Shame on him. The U.K. and Australia are now increasing the drinking age to 21 from 18 for all the reasons we did so in the US. Plain and simple, it saves lives and reduces the likelihood of early addiction.Driving drunk is not the only risk. Overdosing on alcohol kills more kids now than driving fatalities. Alcohol is a toxin and alters how you feel and think. How can anyone equate military service with a health risk? That's like saying because a 10 year old can read and write and think they should be allowed to go to college. Life experience and maturity are in short supply for the average 18 year old . . .three years DOES make a difference.

Posted by Joshua Savage on 05 Apr 08 07:39 PM EDT
What I forgot to mention about the fines is that most people don't have money to pay the expensive fines, and therefore end up serving time behind bars instead, as well as serving community service. Never been there myself, however I know some who have been, and it sucks! The state thinks they can just charge fines for everything, but I think alcohol under 21 but over 18, is stupid to charge a fine + jail time for.

Posted by Joshua Savage on 05 Apr 08 07:35 PM EDT
I agree that the drinking law should be lowered. The amount of money used to throw those under 21 (18+)in jail for drinking has got to be pretty high. On top of charging fines (which also effect the economy), spending the states money for the room & board at the jail, I'd say it probably costs alot. I love the idea of getting a license to drink, and I think the idea of "alcohol-ed" is great. Why can't the Government support something that really WOULD help? I'd love to see it happen, but unfortunately I don't think they will be smart enough to allow it to pass. My $.02

Posted by AddictionPro on 17 Mar 08 04:22 AM EDT
For the present, the most frequently used chemical by those under 21 and in the age 13 to 21 years of age is marijuana. It is easier to get. Next to nicotine, alcohol is the biggest killer. What would happen if we simply lowered the age to drink alcohol and issued an 18 to 25 years of age alcohol use permit or license which would be immediately taken away if there was any misuse of alcohol? That same license would also legalize, tax and regulate the use of marijuana. The end result, fewer alcohol related problems and carnage on the highways not to mention a break-up in the need for "gang connections." We would need to dispell the myth and misconception about marijuana and show it as a big moneymaker for a very large segment of the population. That is where the battle would be from a legalization standpoint. Far too many use the law to profit from marijuana use and those of you who do know who you are. I do not need to point fingers of shame nor name names. Something to think about.

Posted by Stash Kozlowski on 16 Mar 08 11:15 PM EDT
I am in agreement with John McCardell, I believe if we can do anything from dieing for our country, to getting married, to going to jail then why can't we have a drink. I support the idea of issuing a drinkers permit, we can be issued a drivers permit at 17 and be put on the road but yet when we are a legal adult we can't have a beer. After raising the drinking age to 21 in 1984 has it stopped underage drinking? The answer to that is NO. All we have done is forced it underground.

Posted by Richard Martino on 21 Feb 08 07:38 PM EST
I think that it should be lowered to 18 becuase now more the every there is under age drinking and that is becuase of the change to 21. people may think its making things better but it isn't becuase the law can't watch everyone and poeple drinking under age will always find away to drink no matter what

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for everyone, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, focused, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post personal requests for help or general promotions for your organization (Get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.