Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Conspiracy Charged in Mass. NIMBY Case
October 25, 2007

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

A group looking to expand a group recovery home in Framingham, Mass., has filed a federal lawsuit claiming that town officials and some local residents conspired to derail the plan, the Boston Globe reported Oct. 25.

The South Middlesex Opportunity Council claims that Framingham officials illegally manipulated local zoning laws while a group of residents waged a smear campaign to prevent the program's expansion. The Council charged that together the officials and residents engaged in a "coordinated effort" to rid the town of its disabled population, calling program residents "human waste" and the "dregs of society."

This is the third lawsuit filed against the town of Framingham during the past two years alleging violations of federal and state civil-rights of needy or sick residents.

Local residents and politicians said that they had acted legally and out of concern that Framingham had become a magnet for social-services programs. Town council member Steven Orr, who runs a community website where some defamatory statements about the recovering residents had appeared, called the lawsuit "completely, unbelievably unfair."

"There is no place in the state that has done more to help people with social service needs" than Framingham, he said.

The latest controversy revolves around Sage House, a residential treatment program. The Council wanted to double the capacity of the 16-year-old program by converting a former nursing home into a recovery home for up to 15 families. A group called Stop Tax Exempt Private Property Sprawl (STEPPS), led by a Town Council member, Peter C.S. Adams, called the project a "homeless drug rehab shelter" and launched a campaign against the expansion.

"It has never been our mission to rid the town of anyone disabled," Adams said. "The stated mission of STEPPS is to check the rate of growth of social services in Framingham."

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines


Posted by Anonymous on 01 Nov 07 07:49 PM EDT
your town is wonderfully humane to serve so many people who need this service pay for jail or pay for wellness...how is mci...enough beds yet or still 7-8 to a rm sized for 4

Posted by Andy L on 26 Oct 07 09:45 AM EDT
The Federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 clearly was added specifically to prevent such attrocities in descrimination.

Posted by Judie on 26 Oct 07 09:34 AM EDT
Thanks for the heads-up. Framingham doesn't sound like a community I would enjoy living and working in.

Posted by Robert Moro on 26 Oct 07 09:19 AM EDT
Sadly, this story is a metaphor for countless town and citi-wide battles over treatment programs, homeless shelters, half-way houses and other institutions aimed at helping troubled citizens. Just this morning NPR had a story about San Franscisco citizens beginning to challenge their city's historic tolerance of the homeless. I don;t know how to make the debate more fair-perhaps a statewide or federal assessment of existing facilities to determine where there is an imbalance of such programs? You could call it "OWFIMBY": Only what's fair in my back yard.

 

 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Robert Moro on 26 Oct 07 09:19 AM EDT
Sadly, this story is a metaphor for countless town and citi-wide battles over treatment programs, homeless shelters, half-way houses and other institutions aimed at helping troubled citizens. Just this morning NPR had a story about San Franscisco citizens beginning to challenge their city's historic tolerance of the homeless. I don;t know how to make the debate more fair-perhaps a statewide or federal assessment of existing facilities to determine where there is an imbalance of such programs? You could call it "OWFIMBY": Only what's fair in my back yard.

Posted by Judie on 26 Oct 07 09:34 AM EDT
Thanks for the heads-up. Framingham doesn't sound like a community I would enjoy living and working in.

Posted by Andy L on 26 Oct 07 09:45 AM EDT
The Federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 clearly was added specifically to prevent such attrocities in descrimination.

Posted by Anonymous on 01 Nov 07 07:49 PM EDT
your town is wonderfully humane to serve so many people who need this service pay for jail or pay for wellness...how is mci...enough beds yet or still 7-8 to a rm sized for 4

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines