Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Conspiracy Charged in Mass. NIMBY Case
October 25, 2007

Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

A group looking to expand a group recovery home in Framingham, Mass., has filed a federal lawsuit claiming that town officials and some local residents conspired to derail the plan, the Boston Globe reported Oct. 25.

The South Middlesex Opportunity Council claims that Framingham officials illegally manipulated local zoning laws while a group of residents waged a smear campaign to prevent the program's expansion. The Council charged that together the officials and residents engaged in a "coordinated effort" to rid the town of its disabled population, calling program residents "human waste" and the "dregs of society."

This is the third lawsuit filed against the town of Framingham during the past two years alleging violations of federal and state civil-rights of needy or sick residents.

Local residents and politicians said that they had acted legally and out of concern that Framingham had become a magnet for social-services programs. Town council member Steven Orr, who runs a community website where some defamatory statements about the recovering residents had appeared, called the lawsuit "completely, unbelievably unfair."

"There is no place in the state that has done more to help people with social service needs" than Framingham, he said.

The latest controversy revolves around Sage House, a residential treatment program. The Council wanted to double the capacity of the 16-year-old program by converting a former nursing home into a recovery home for up to 15 families. A group called Stop Tax Exempt Private Property Sprawl (STEPPS), led by a Town Council member, Peter C.S. Adams, called the project a "homeless drug rehab shelter" and launched a campaign against the expansion.

"It has never been our mission to rid the town of anyone disabled," Adams said. "The stated mission of STEPPS is to check the rate of growth of social services in Framingham."

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for everyone, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, focused, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post personal requests for help or general promotions for your organization (Get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.


Posted by Anonymous on 01 Nov 07 07:49 PM EDT
your town is wonderfully humane to serve so many people who need this service pay for jail or pay for wellness...how is mci...enough beds yet or still 7-8 to a rm sized for 4

Posted by Andy L on 26 Oct 07 09:45 AM EDT
The Federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 clearly was added specifically to prevent such attrocities in descrimination.

Posted by Judie on 26 Oct 07 09:34 AM EDT
Thanks for the heads-up. Framingham doesn't sound like a community I would enjoy living and working in.

Posted by Robert Moro on 26 Oct 07 09:19 AM EDT
Sadly, this story is a metaphor for countless town and citi-wide battles over treatment programs, homeless shelters, half-way houses and other institutions aimed at helping troubled citizens. Just this morning NPR had a story about San Franscisco citizens beginning to challenge their city's historic tolerance of the homeless. I don;t know how to make the debate more fair-perhaps a statewide or federal assessment of existing facilities to determine where there is an imbalance of such programs? You could call it "OWFIMBY": Only what's fair in my back yard.

 

 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Anonymous on 01 Nov 07 07:49 PM EDT
your town is wonderfully humane to serve so many people who need this service pay for jail or pay for wellness...how is mci...enough beds yet or still 7-8 to a rm sized for 4

Posted by Andy L on 26 Oct 07 09:45 AM EDT
The Federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 clearly was added specifically to prevent such attrocities in descrimination.

Posted by Judie on 26 Oct 07 09:34 AM EDT
Thanks for the heads-up. Framingham doesn't sound like a community I would enjoy living and working in.

Posted by Robert Moro on 26 Oct 07 09:19 AM EDT
Sadly, this story is a metaphor for countless town and citi-wide battles over treatment programs, homeless shelters, half-way houses and other institutions aimed at helping troubled citizens. Just this morning NPR had a story about San Franscisco citizens beginning to challenge their city's historic tolerance of the homeless. I don;t know how to make the debate more fair-perhaps a statewide or federal assessment of existing facilities to determine where there is an imbalance of such programs? You could call it "OWFIMBY": Only what's fair in my back yard.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for everyone, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, focused, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post personal requests for help or general promotions for your organization (Get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.