Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Darvocet Should Be Banned, Group Says
March 7, 2006

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The painkiller Darvocet and its chemical cousins should be banned by the Food and Drug Administration, according to Public Citizen's Health Research Group.

The Associated Press reported March 2 that the group contends that the drug caused more than 2,100 accidental deaths between 1981 and 1999, and also has been used by thousands more to commit suicide. Public Citizen is petitioning the FDA to ban propoxyphene, the main ingredient in Darvon and Darvocet, saying it carries unacceptable risk for a relatively weak painkiller.

Propoxyphene has been sold legally in the U.S. since 1957, and Public Citizen has been trying to get it banned since 1978. "This a black-and-white example of a drug where its risks far outweigh its benefits," said Public Citizen's Sidney Wolfe. "There's no excuse for this drug to be around." 

In 2005, regulators in the U.K. decided on a phased ban on the drug. About 23 million prescriptions for propoxyphene-based drugs are written in the U.S. each year. Heart problems like arrhythmia are among the known health risks of using the drug.

The drug also is widely abused, with 21 million Americans misusing drugs containing propoxyphene or codeine in 2004.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Aaron on 01 Feb 09 11:14 AM EST
I have a illness that has caused me pain for most of my life. Ive been on Darvocet for years. Anyone who says it dont help for pain obviously never had pain and never tried it. Its never caused me any trouble and never did anything but good for me and banning it is just stupid and wrong because without it my quality of life will certinally be affected and im sure others will as well. Its about time the govt starts concentrating on what should be banned like smoking instead of good drugs that help people!

Posted by Michelle on 09 Feb 09 07:44 AM EST
For every one person it helps, there are vast numbers it causes harm for.There a more people who are suffering silently from prescription addictions than the general public can even begin to comprehend.

Posted by Holli on 14 Feb 09 09:11 PM EST
So, once again the one person who is properly treated and helped by the medication should just suffer because some people CHOOSE to misuse their meds. When, oh when will people start taking responsibility for their own actions. According to the statistics of this article 2,100 people died in an eighteen year time span but 23 million prescriptions per year were issued....that sounds more like for the millions it helps a few people either misuse or have adverse reactions and die. Kinda like peanuts... maybe we should ban peanut butter too......

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines