Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Big Damages Award Against Philip Morris Upheld
February 6, 2006

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The widow of a smoker who died of lung cancer has her $79.5-million judgment against Philip Morris upheld by the Oregon Supreme Court, the Dow Jones News Service reported Feb. 2.

The state court unanimously rejected an appeal of the punitive-damages award by Philip Morris, which argued that the penalty violated the company's due-process rights. Mayola Williams sued the tobacco firm for negligence and fraud after her husband, Jessie, died of cancer in 1997.

The tobacco company previously appealed the verdict to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sent the case back to the Oregon courts for review. The Oregon Supreme Court concluded that Philip Morris' conduct in trying to minimize research on the health risks of cancer was "extraordinarily reprehensible" and therefore justified the penalties.

Philip Morris promised another appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.